抗凝剂治疗急性静脉血栓栓塞孕妇出血的风险:一项国际多数据库队列研究

IF 5.5 2区 医学 Q1 HEMATOLOGY
Camille Simard, Isabelle Malhamé, Christopher Filliter, Annika Vivirito, Kristian B Filion, Haim Abenhaim, Dirk Enders, Antonios Douros, Vicky Tagalakis
{"title":"抗凝剂治疗急性静脉血栓栓塞孕妇出血的风险:一项国际多数据库队列研究","authors":"Camille Simard, Isabelle Malhamé, Christopher Filliter, Annika Vivirito, Kristian B Filion, Haim Abenhaim, Dirk Enders, Antonios Douros, Vicky Tagalakis","doi":"10.1016/j.jtha.2025.06.015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Venous thromboembolism (VTE), including deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE), is a major cause of maternal mortality. Low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) is the mainstay of therapy for VTE during pregnancy. However, the effects of different LMWH types and dosing regimens on bleeding risk remain unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This multinational retrospective cohort study used population-level healthcare data from Québec, Canada, and Germany and included women with acute VTE during pregnancy who initiated therapeutic doses of LMWH within 15 days of incident VTE. We used Cox proportional hazards models to compare the risk of major bleeding associated with the most commonly prescribed LMWHs, dalteparin in Québec and enoxaparin in Germany, versus other LMWHs. Additionally, we examined the impact of once-daily versus twice-daily LMWH dosing on bleeding outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study cohort included 567 pregnant women (Germany n=308; Québec n=259) with VTE treated with LMWH. Major bleeding occurred in 6.5-7.7% of patients in both cohorts. The hazard ratios [95% confidence interval] for the most prescribed LMWH vs other LMWHs was 0.9 [0.3-2.5] in Québec and 1.4 [0.5-4.1] in Germany. No significant differences in bleeding risk were found between once-daily and twice-daily dosing schedules.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our multinational cohort study provided population-based incidence rates for bleeding related to LMWH use during VTE treatment in pregnancy. Moreover, while hypothesis generating, our findings suggest that the LMWH type and dosing frequency may not influence bleeding risk in pregnant women with VTE. Further research is necessary to explore anticoagulation strategies to optimize outcomes and minimize bleeding complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":17326,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Risk of Bleeding in Pregnant Women with Acute Venous Thromboembolism Treated with Anticoagulants: An International Multi-Database Cohort Study.\",\"authors\":\"Camille Simard, Isabelle Malhamé, Christopher Filliter, Annika Vivirito, Kristian B Filion, Haim Abenhaim, Dirk Enders, Antonios Douros, Vicky Tagalakis\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jtha.2025.06.015\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Venous thromboembolism (VTE), including deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE), is a major cause of maternal mortality. Low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) is the mainstay of therapy for VTE during pregnancy. However, the effects of different LMWH types and dosing regimens on bleeding risk remain unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This multinational retrospective cohort study used population-level healthcare data from Québec, Canada, and Germany and included women with acute VTE during pregnancy who initiated therapeutic doses of LMWH within 15 days of incident VTE. We used Cox proportional hazards models to compare the risk of major bleeding associated with the most commonly prescribed LMWHs, dalteparin in Québec and enoxaparin in Germany, versus other LMWHs. Additionally, we examined the impact of once-daily versus twice-daily LMWH dosing on bleeding outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study cohort included 567 pregnant women (Germany n=308; Québec n=259) with VTE treated with LMWH. Major bleeding occurred in 6.5-7.7% of patients in both cohorts. The hazard ratios [95% confidence interval] for the most prescribed LMWH vs other LMWHs was 0.9 [0.3-2.5] in Québec and 1.4 [0.5-4.1] in Germany. No significant differences in bleeding risk were found between once-daily and twice-daily dosing schedules.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our multinational cohort study provided population-based incidence rates for bleeding related to LMWH use during VTE treatment in pregnancy. Moreover, while hypothesis generating, our findings suggest that the LMWH type and dosing frequency may not influence bleeding risk in pregnant women with VTE. Further research is necessary to explore anticoagulation strategies to optimize outcomes and minimize bleeding complications.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17326,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtha.2025.06.015\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtha.2025.06.015","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:静脉血栓栓塞(VTE),包括深静脉血栓形成(DVT)和肺栓塞(PE),是孕产妇死亡的主要原因。低分子肝素(LMWH)是治疗妊娠期静脉血栓栓塞的主要药物。然而,不同低分子肝素类型和给药方案对出血风险的影响尚不清楚。方法:这项跨国回顾性队列研究使用了来自科威特、加拿大和德国的人群水平的医疗保健数据,包括在静脉血栓栓塞事件发生15天内开始治疗剂量低分子肝素的妊娠期急性静脉血栓栓塞妇女。我们使用Cox比例风险模型来比较最常用的低分子肝素与其他低分子肝素相关的大出血风险,这些低分子肝素是中国的达特帕林和德国的依诺肝素。此外,我们研究了每日一次与每日两次低分子肝素给药对出血结局的影响。结果:研究队列包括567名孕妇(德国n=308;用低分子肝素治疗静脉血栓栓塞患者(n=259)。在两个队列中,有6.5-7.7%的患者发生大出血。大多数处方低分子肝素与其他低分子肝素的风险比[95%置信区间]在曲海为0.9[0.3-2.5],在德国为1.4[0.5-4.1]。每日一次和每日两次给药方案在出血风险方面没有显著差异。结论:我们的跨国队列研究提供了基于人群的妊娠静脉血栓栓塞治疗期间使用低分子肝素相关出血的发生率。此外,在假设产生的同时,我们的研究结果表明,低分子肝素类型和给药频率可能不会影响静脉血栓栓塞孕妇的出血风险。需要进一步的研究来探索抗凝策略以优化结果并减少出血并发症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Risk of Bleeding in Pregnant Women with Acute Venous Thromboembolism Treated with Anticoagulants: An International Multi-Database Cohort Study.

Background: Venous thromboembolism (VTE), including deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE), is a major cause of maternal mortality. Low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) is the mainstay of therapy for VTE during pregnancy. However, the effects of different LMWH types and dosing regimens on bleeding risk remain unclear.

Methods: This multinational retrospective cohort study used population-level healthcare data from Québec, Canada, and Germany and included women with acute VTE during pregnancy who initiated therapeutic doses of LMWH within 15 days of incident VTE. We used Cox proportional hazards models to compare the risk of major bleeding associated with the most commonly prescribed LMWHs, dalteparin in Québec and enoxaparin in Germany, versus other LMWHs. Additionally, we examined the impact of once-daily versus twice-daily LMWH dosing on bleeding outcomes.

Results: The study cohort included 567 pregnant women (Germany n=308; Québec n=259) with VTE treated with LMWH. Major bleeding occurred in 6.5-7.7% of patients in both cohorts. The hazard ratios [95% confidence interval] for the most prescribed LMWH vs other LMWHs was 0.9 [0.3-2.5] in Québec and 1.4 [0.5-4.1] in Germany. No significant differences in bleeding risk were found between once-daily and twice-daily dosing schedules.

Conclusion: Our multinational cohort study provided population-based incidence rates for bleeding related to LMWH use during VTE treatment in pregnancy. Moreover, while hypothesis generating, our findings suggest that the LMWH type and dosing frequency may not influence bleeding risk in pregnant women with VTE. Further research is necessary to explore anticoagulation strategies to optimize outcomes and minimize bleeding complications.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis
Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
24.30
自引率
3.80%
发文量
321
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis (JTH) serves as the official journal of the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis. It is dedicated to advancing science related to thrombosis, bleeding disorders, and vascular biology through the dissemination and exchange of information and ideas within the global research community. Types of Publications: The journal publishes a variety of content, including: Original research reports State-of-the-art reviews Brief reports Case reports Invited commentaries on publications in the Journal Forum articles Correspondence Announcements Scope of Contributions: Editors invite contributions from both fundamental and clinical domains. These include: Basic manuscripts on blood coagulation and fibrinolysis Studies on proteins and reactions related to thrombosis and haemostasis Research on blood platelets and their interactions with other biological systems, such as the vessel wall, blood cells, and invading organisms Clinical manuscripts covering various topics including venous thrombosis, arterial disease, hemophilia, bleeding disorders, and platelet diseases Clinical manuscripts may encompass etiology, diagnostics, prognosis, prevention, and treatment strategies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信