新鲜的衣服,呼吸困难:洗衣习惯,洗涤剂,软化剂和喘息儿童的呼吸功能受损。

IF 5.8 2区 医学 Q1 ALLERGY
Gülten Tunçerler, Simge Atar Beşe, Cihangir Şahin, Nur Törer, Duygu Erge, Pinar Uysal
{"title":"新鲜的衣服,呼吸困难:洗衣习惯,洗涤剂,软化剂和喘息儿童的呼吸功能受损。","authors":"Gülten Tunçerler, Simge Atar Beşe, Cihangir Şahin, Nur Törer, Duygu Erge, Pinar Uysal","doi":"10.1016/j.anai.2025.07.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Early childhood wheezing may indicate asthma risk, making assessment of environmental triggers crucial. Recent research has identified potential effects of laundry product chemicals on airway epithelial barriers.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the relationship between the chemical contents and usage habits of household laundry products and pulmonary function in preschool children with recurrent wheezing and the effect of using soap-based detergent without additives on respiratory parameters measured by impulse oscillometry.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective case-control study enrolled 80 recently diagnosed wheezy children (CW) and 80 healthy children (HC) between August 2023-February 2024. Laundry habits and product chemical ingredients were recorded. Respiratory function was measured by impulse oscillometry (IOS), assessing airway resistance (zR5, zR20, R5-20) and reactance (zX5, zX20, Fres, AX).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Softener use was higher in the CW group (p=0.011). Chemical analysis revealed significantly higher frequency of sodium laurylsulphate (SLS), nonionic active substances, cocoglicoside, methylsotilozlolinone, butylphenylmethylpropional, linolol, coumarin, and oxygen-based bleaching agents in detergents used by the CW group compared to HCs (p<0.05). Similarly, cationic active substances, coumarin, linolol, and benzisotizolinone were more prevalent in softeners used by CW families (p<0.05). The CW group exhibited higher resistance values (zR5, zR20, R5-20, Fres, AX) and lower zX5 compared to HC (p<0.05). Children using additive-free detergents showed lower airway resistance (zR5, zR20) (p<0.05), while those using soap-free products had higher resistance measurements (p<0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Wheezy children have greater exposure to laundry softener chemicals than healthy counterparts. Additive-containing products were associated with increased airway resistance, while soap-based detergents showed no detectable impact on respiratory function. These findings suggest a potential link between chemical laundry products and impaired respiratory function in preschool wheezy children.</p>","PeriodicalId":50773,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Allergy Asthma & Immunology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"FRESH CLOTHES, HARD BREATHS: Laundry washing habits, Detergents, Softeners, and Impaired Respiratory Functions in Wheezy Children.\",\"authors\":\"Gülten Tunçerler, Simge Atar Beşe, Cihangir Şahin, Nur Törer, Duygu Erge, Pinar Uysal\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.anai.2025.07.006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Early childhood wheezing may indicate asthma risk, making assessment of environmental triggers crucial. Recent research has identified potential effects of laundry product chemicals on airway epithelial barriers.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the relationship between the chemical contents and usage habits of household laundry products and pulmonary function in preschool children with recurrent wheezing and the effect of using soap-based detergent without additives on respiratory parameters measured by impulse oscillometry.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective case-control study enrolled 80 recently diagnosed wheezy children (CW) and 80 healthy children (HC) between August 2023-February 2024. Laundry habits and product chemical ingredients were recorded. Respiratory function was measured by impulse oscillometry (IOS), assessing airway resistance (zR5, zR20, R5-20) and reactance (zX5, zX20, Fres, AX).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Softener use was higher in the CW group (p=0.011). Chemical analysis revealed significantly higher frequency of sodium laurylsulphate (SLS), nonionic active substances, cocoglicoside, methylsotilozlolinone, butylphenylmethylpropional, linolol, coumarin, and oxygen-based bleaching agents in detergents used by the CW group compared to HCs (p<0.05). Similarly, cationic active substances, coumarin, linolol, and benzisotizolinone were more prevalent in softeners used by CW families (p<0.05). The CW group exhibited higher resistance values (zR5, zR20, R5-20, Fres, AX) and lower zX5 compared to HC (p<0.05). Children using additive-free detergents showed lower airway resistance (zR5, zR20) (p<0.05), while those using soap-free products had higher resistance measurements (p<0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Wheezy children have greater exposure to laundry softener chemicals than healthy counterparts. Additive-containing products were associated with increased airway resistance, while soap-based detergents showed no detectable impact on respiratory function. These findings suggest a potential link between chemical laundry products and impaired respiratory function in preschool wheezy children.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50773,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Allergy Asthma & Immunology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Allergy Asthma & Immunology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anai.2025.07.006\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ALLERGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Allergy Asthma & Immunology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anai.2025.07.006","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:儿童早期喘息可能预示哮喘风险,因此评估环境触发因素至关重要。最近的研究已经确定了洗衣产品的化学物质对气道上皮屏障的潜在影响。目的:探讨学龄前反复喘息儿童家用洗涤用品化学成分、使用习惯与肺功能的关系,以及使用无添加皂基洗涤用品对脉冲振荡法测定呼吸参数的影响。方法:本前瞻性病例对照研究于2023年8月至2024年2月期间招募了80名最近诊断为喘息儿童(CW)和80名健康儿童(HC)。记录洗涤习惯和产品化学成分。采用脉冲振荡法(IOS)测量呼吸功能,评估气道阻力(zR5、zR20、R5-20)和电抗(zX5、zX20、Fres、AX)。结果:CW组软化剂使用率较高(p=0.011)。化学分析显示,与hc组相比,CW组使用的洗涤剂中使用的月桂酸钠(SLS)、非离子活性物质、椰子糖苷、甲基sotilozlolinone、丁基苯基甲基丙烯、亚麻油醇、香豆素和氧基漂白剂的频率明显更高(结论:喘息儿童比健康儿童接触到更多的洗衣软化剂化学物质)。含添加剂的产品与气道阻力增加有关,而皂基洗涤剂对呼吸功能没有可检测到的影响。这些发现表明,化学洗衣产品与学龄前喘息儿童呼吸功能受损之间存在潜在联系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
FRESH CLOTHES, HARD BREATHS: Laundry washing habits, Detergents, Softeners, and Impaired Respiratory Functions in Wheezy Children.

Background: Early childhood wheezing may indicate asthma risk, making assessment of environmental triggers crucial. Recent research has identified potential effects of laundry product chemicals on airway epithelial barriers.

Objective: To evaluate the relationship between the chemical contents and usage habits of household laundry products and pulmonary function in preschool children with recurrent wheezing and the effect of using soap-based detergent without additives on respiratory parameters measured by impulse oscillometry.

Methods: This prospective case-control study enrolled 80 recently diagnosed wheezy children (CW) and 80 healthy children (HC) between August 2023-February 2024. Laundry habits and product chemical ingredients were recorded. Respiratory function was measured by impulse oscillometry (IOS), assessing airway resistance (zR5, zR20, R5-20) and reactance (zX5, zX20, Fres, AX).

Results: Softener use was higher in the CW group (p=0.011). Chemical analysis revealed significantly higher frequency of sodium laurylsulphate (SLS), nonionic active substances, cocoglicoside, methylsotilozlolinone, butylphenylmethylpropional, linolol, coumarin, and oxygen-based bleaching agents in detergents used by the CW group compared to HCs (p<0.05). Similarly, cationic active substances, coumarin, linolol, and benzisotizolinone were more prevalent in softeners used by CW families (p<0.05). The CW group exhibited higher resistance values (zR5, zR20, R5-20, Fres, AX) and lower zX5 compared to HC (p<0.05). Children using additive-free detergents showed lower airway resistance (zR5, zR20) (p<0.05), while those using soap-free products had higher resistance measurements (p<0.05).

Conclusion: Wheezy children have greater exposure to laundry softener chemicals than healthy counterparts. Additive-containing products were associated with increased airway resistance, while soap-based detergents showed no detectable impact on respiratory function. These findings suggest a potential link between chemical laundry products and impaired respiratory function in preschool wheezy children.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
6.80%
发文量
437
审稿时长
33 days
期刊介绍: Annals of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology is a scholarly medical journal published monthly by the American College of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. The purpose of Annals is to serve as an objective evidence-based forum for the allergy/immunology specialist to keep up to date on current clinical science (both research and practice-based) in the fields of allergy, asthma, and immunology. The emphasis of the journal will be to provide clinical and research information that is readily applicable to both the clinician and the researcher. Each issue of the Annals shall also provide opportunities to participate in accredited continuing medical education activities to enhance overall clinical proficiency.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信