Alexander Heitkamp, Sophie-Maria Hierholzer, Christian Heitkamp, Laurens Winkelmeier, Lukas Meyer, Matthias Bechstein, Vincent Geest, Gabriel Broocks, Caspar Brekenfeld, Fabian Flottmann, Maximilian Schell, Götz Thomalla, Tobias Faizy, Jens Fiehler, Helge C Kniep, Susanne Gellißen
{"title":"卒中干预中更好结果的关键:早期与完全再灌注在第一次通道再通中。","authors":"Alexander Heitkamp, Sophie-Maria Hierholzer, Christian Heitkamp, Laurens Winkelmeier, Lukas Meyer, Matthias Bechstein, Vincent Geest, Gabriel Broocks, Caspar Brekenfeld, Fabian Flottmann, Maximilian Schell, Götz Thomalla, Tobias Faizy, Jens Fiehler, Helge C Kniep, Susanne Gellißen","doi":"10.1007/s00415-025-13235-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>First pass (FP) recanalization, defined as achieving mTICI 2b or higher in a single thrombectomy attempt, has been linked to better functional recovery in acute ischemic stroke patients. This study aimed to investigate whether the benefits of FP are primarily driven by higher rates of complete reperfusion (mTICI 3) or by faster procedure times.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from 3707 patients with middle cerebral artery occlusion and successful recanalization (mTICI 2b or higher) were extracted from the prospectively designed German Stroke Registry (2015-2021). Good functional outcomes were defined as a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of ≤ 2 at 90 days. Mediation analysis was used to evaluate the extent to which complete reperfusion (mTICI 3) and shorter groin puncture to recanalization time contributed to improved outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>FP recanalization was associated with significantly better functional outcomes: 46.9% of FP patients achieved an mRS ≤ 2 compared to 37.2% in the multi-pass group. Mediation analysis showed that only 14% of the improved outcomes with FP were explained by higher mTICI 3 rates, while 37% were attributed to faster recanalization times.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The improved outcomes associated with FP recanalization are primarily driven by the speed of reperfusion rather than the degree of complete recanalization. This highlights the importance of minimizing procedure times and the number of thrombectomy attempts. Strategies aimed at optimizing treatment workflows and improving device design to prioritize early and efficient reperfusion after the FP are critical to improving patient outcomes (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03356392).</p>","PeriodicalId":16558,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neurology","volume":"272 8","pages":"504"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12254091/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Key to better outcomes in stroke intervention: early versus complete reperfusion in first pass recanalization.\",\"authors\":\"Alexander Heitkamp, Sophie-Maria Hierholzer, Christian Heitkamp, Laurens Winkelmeier, Lukas Meyer, Matthias Bechstein, Vincent Geest, Gabriel Broocks, Caspar Brekenfeld, Fabian Flottmann, Maximilian Schell, Götz Thomalla, Tobias Faizy, Jens Fiehler, Helge C Kniep, Susanne Gellißen\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00415-025-13235-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>First pass (FP) recanalization, defined as achieving mTICI 2b or higher in a single thrombectomy attempt, has been linked to better functional recovery in acute ischemic stroke patients. This study aimed to investigate whether the benefits of FP are primarily driven by higher rates of complete reperfusion (mTICI 3) or by faster procedure times.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from 3707 patients with middle cerebral artery occlusion and successful recanalization (mTICI 2b or higher) were extracted from the prospectively designed German Stroke Registry (2015-2021). Good functional outcomes were defined as a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of ≤ 2 at 90 days. Mediation analysis was used to evaluate the extent to which complete reperfusion (mTICI 3) and shorter groin puncture to recanalization time contributed to improved outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>FP recanalization was associated with significantly better functional outcomes: 46.9% of FP patients achieved an mRS ≤ 2 compared to 37.2% in the multi-pass group. Mediation analysis showed that only 14% of the improved outcomes with FP were explained by higher mTICI 3 rates, while 37% were attributed to faster recanalization times.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The improved outcomes associated with FP recanalization are primarily driven by the speed of reperfusion rather than the degree of complete recanalization. This highlights the importance of minimizing procedure times and the number of thrombectomy attempts. Strategies aimed at optimizing treatment workflows and improving device design to prioritize early and efficient reperfusion after the FP are critical to improving patient outcomes (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03356392).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16558,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Neurology\",\"volume\":\"272 8\",\"pages\":\"504\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12254091/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Neurology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-025-13235-5\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-025-13235-5","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Key to better outcomes in stroke intervention: early versus complete reperfusion in first pass recanalization.
Background and purpose: First pass (FP) recanalization, defined as achieving mTICI 2b or higher in a single thrombectomy attempt, has been linked to better functional recovery in acute ischemic stroke patients. This study aimed to investigate whether the benefits of FP are primarily driven by higher rates of complete reperfusion (mTICI 3) or by faster procedure times.
Methods: Data from 3707 patients with middle cerebral artery occlusion and successful recanalization (mTICI 2b or higher) were extracted from the prospectively designed German Stroke Registry (2015-2021). Good functional outcomes were defined as a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of ≤ 2 at 90 days. Mediation analysis was used to evaluate the extent to which complete reperfusion (mTICI 3) and shorter groin puncture to recanalization time contributed to improved outcomes.
Results: FP recanalization was associated with significantly better functional outcomes: 46.9% of FP patients achieved an mRS ≤ 2 compared to 37.2% in the multi-pass group. Mediation analysis showed that only 14% of the improved outcomes with FP were explained by higher mTICI 3 rates, while 37% were attributed to faster recanalization times.
Conclusion: The improved outcomes associated with FP recanalization are primarily driven by the speed of reperfusion rather than the degree of complete recanalization. This highlights the importance of minimizing procedure times and the number of thrombectomy attempts. Strategies aimed at optimizing treatment workflows and improving device design to prioritize early and efficient reperfusion after the FP are critical to improving patient outcomes (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03356392).
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Neurology is an international peer-reviewed journal which provides a source for publishing original communications and reviews on clinical neurology covering the whole field.
In addition, Letters to the Editors serve as a forum for clinical cases and the exchange of ideas which highlight important new findings. A section on Neurological progress serves to summarise the major findings in certain fields of neurology. Commentaries on new developments in clinical neuroscience, which may be commissioned or submitted, are published as editorials.
Every neurologist interested in the current diagnosis and treatment of neurological disorders needs access to the information contained in this valuable journal.