设计一套用于医疗器械中提取的聚合物添加剂非靶向分析的参考标准。

Byeong Hwa Yun, Amali Herath, Ying Jin, Jamie Kim, Kerry Belton, Echoleah Rufer, Omar Rivera Betancourt
{"title":"设计一套用于医疗器械中提取的聚合物添加剂非靶向分析的参考标准。","authors":"Byeong Hwa Yun, Amali Herath, Ying Jin, Jamie Kim, Kerry Belton, Echoleah Rufer, Omar Rivera Betancourt","doi":"10.1038/s41370-025-00788-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The accurate analysis of extractables and leachables (E&L) from medical devices is crucial for the reliable safety risk assessment of substances to which patients and users may be exposed. The extractable profile of medical devices is often complex and unpredictable, thus improper selection of reference standards can lead to irreproducible chemical analyses between laboratories. ISO 10993-18, the international consensus standard for chemical characterization of medical devices, does not specify a process for selection of appropriate chemical reference standards for non-targeted analysis of E&L, leading to a variety of approaches being used.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study seeks to set out requirements for building a comprehensive list of chemical reference standards for non-targeted analysis of E&L and propose suggestions for selecting appropriate standards to enhance the consistency of chemical analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Criteria for selecting reference standards for non-targeted analysis of E&L in medical devices were developed using relevant polymer additives as a model system. The Relative Response Factor (RRF) values of the selected reference standards were determined using GC-MS and LC-MS analysis across three different concentrations. A system was developed to rank the toxicological hazards of the selected reference standards.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A list of 106 reference standards of polymer additives was compiled, encompassing a wide range of physicochemical properties and broad toxicological coverage. Statistical analyses of these chemicals revealed there was no significant correlation between their six physicochemical properties and the corresponding relative response factors measured by GC-MS and LC-MS techniques.</p><p><strong>Impact: </strong>Accurate chemical identification and quantification of extractable substances from medical devices is important for chemical characterization of medical devices. The accurate quantitation of extractable chemicals in medical devices through non-targeted analysis is dependent on the proper selection of reference standards. We have proposed a set of reference standards intended to enhance the confidence in quantitation of device extractables, covering a broad range of structural and physicochemical diversity. This set of reference standards may assist chemistry laboratories in developing robust screening methods for extractables in medical devices, supporting the accurate characterization of medical devices.</p>","PeriodicalId":520670,"journal":{"name":"Journal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Designing a set of reference standards for non-targeted analysis of polymer additives extracted from medical devices.\",\"authors\":\"Byeong Hwa Yun, Amali Herath, Ying Jin, Jamie Kim, Kerry Belton, Echoleah Rufer, Omar Rivera Betancourt\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41370-025-00788-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The accurate analysis of extractables and leachables (E&L) from medical devices is crucial for the reliable safety risk assessment of substances to which patients and users may be exposed. The extractable profile of medical devices is often complex and unpredictable, thus improper selection of reference standards can lead to irreproducible chemical analyses between laboratories. ISO 10993-18, the international consensus standard for chemical characterization of medical devices, does not specify a process for selection of appropriate chemical reference standards for non-targeted analysis of E&L, leading to a variety of approaches being used.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study seeks to set out requirements for building a comprehensive list of chemical reference standards for non-targeted analysis of E&L and propose suggestions for selecting appropriate standards to enhance the consistency of chemical analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Criteria for selecting reference standards for non-targeted analysis of E&L in medical devices were developed using relevant polymer additives as a model system. The Relative Response Factor (RRF) values of the selected reference standards were determined using GC-MS and LC-MS analysis across three different concentrations. A system was developed to rank the toxicological hazards of the selected reference standards.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A list of 106 reference standards of polymer additives was compiled, encompassing a wide range of physicochemical properties and broad toxicological coverage. Statistical analyses of these chemicals revealed there was no significant correlation between their six physicochemical properties and the corresponding relative response factors measured by GC-MS and LC-MS techniques.</p><p><strong>Impact: </strong>Accurate chemical identification and quantification of extractable substances from medical devices is important for chemical characterization of medical devices. The accurate quantitation of extractable chemicals in medical devices through non-targeted analysis is dependent on the proper selection of reference standards. We have proposed a set of reference standards intended to enhance the confidence in quantitation of device extractables, covering a broad range of structural and physicochemical diversity. This set of reference standards may assist chemistry laboratories in developing robust screening methods for extractables in medical devices, supporting the accurate characterization of medical devices.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520670,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41370-025-00788-w\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41370-025-00788-w","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:对医疗器械中可萃取物和可浸出物(E&L)的准确分析对于对患者和使用者可能接触到的物质进行可靠的安全风险评估至关重要。医疗器械的可提取特征通常是复杂和不可预测的,因此,参考标准选择不当可能导致实验室之间的化学分析不可复制。ISO 10993-18是医疗器械化学特性的国际共识标准,它没有规定为E&L的非目标分析选择适当的化学参考标准的过程,导致使用各种方法。目的:提出建立全面的E&L非靶向分析化学参考标准清单的要求,并对选择合适的标准提出建议,以提高化学分析的一致性。方法:以相关聚合物添加剂为模型体系,制定医疗器械中E&L非靶向分析参考标准的选择标准。采用气相色谱-质谱联用和液相色谱-质谱联用方法测定了所选标准品在三种不同浓度下的相对响应因子(RRF)值。建立了一个系统,对选定的参考标准的毒理学危害进行排序。结果:编制了106个聚合物添加剂参考标准,涵盖了广泛的物理化学性质和广泛的毒理学覆盖范围。通过GC-MS和LC-MS技术对这些化学物质进行统计分析,发现它们的6种理化性质与相应的相对响应因子之间没有显著的相关性。影响:从医疗器械中提取物质的准确化学鉴定和定量对医疗器械的化学表征很重要。通过非目标分析对医疗器械中可提取化学物质的准确定量依赖于正确选择参考标准。我们提出了一套参考标准,旨在提高对设备可提取物定量的信心,涵盖广泛的结构和物理化学多样性。这套参考标准可以帮助化学实验室开发医疗器械中萃取物的可靠筛选方法,支持医疗器械的准确表征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Designing a set of reference standards for non-targeted analysis of polymer additives extracted from medical devices.

Background: The accurate analysis of extractables and leachables (E&L) from medical devices is crucial for the reliable safety risk assessment of substances to which patients and users may be exposed. The extractable profile of medical devices is often complex and unpredictable, thus improper selection of reference standards can lead to irreproducible chemical analyses between laboratories. ISO 10993-18, the international consensus standard for chemical characterization of medical devices, does not specify a process for selection of appropriate chemical reference standards for non-targeted analysis of E&L, leading to a variety of approaches being used.

Objective: This study seeks to set out requirements for building a comprehensive list of chemical reference standards for non-targeted analysis of E&L and propose suggestions for selecting appropriate standards to enhance the consistency of chemical analysis.

Methods: Criteria for selecting reference standards for non-targeted analysis of E&L in medical devices were developed using relevant polymer additives as a model system. The Relative Response Factor (RRF) values of the selected reference standards were determined using GC-MS and LC-MS analysis across three different concentrations. A system was developed to rank the toxicological hazards of the selected reference standards.

Results: A list of 106 reference standards of polymer additives was compiled, encompassing a wide range of physicochemical properties and broad toxicological coverage. Statistical analyses of these chemicals revealed there was no significant correlation between their six physicochemical properties and the corresponding relative response factors measured by GC-MS and LC-MS techniques.

Impact: Accurate chemical identification and quantification of extractable substances from medical devices is important for chemical characterization of medical devices. The accurate quantitation of extractable chemicals in medical devices through non-targeted analysis is dependent on the proper selection of reference standards. We have proposed a set of reference standards intended to enhance the confidence in quantitation of device extractables, covering a broad range of structural and physicochemical diversity. This set of reference standards may assist chemistry laboratories in developing robust screening methods for extractables in medical devices, supporting the accurate characterization of medical devices.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信