{"title":"血小板动力学在叶轮使用:一个时间序列分析的模型和处理方法。","authors":"Ikuko Shibasaki, Yasuo Haruyama, Suguru Hirose, Yusuke Takei, Shigeru Toyoda, Hirotsugu Fukuda","doi":"10.1097/MAT.0000000000002498","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Mechanical circulatory support is the standard treatment for refractory cardiogenic shock. However, Impella-induced thrombocytopenia is an established complication, and data on its incidence and characteristics remain limited. This study compared thrombocytopenia progression between patients who received different Impella devices (2.5/CP and 5.0/5.5) using Impella-alone or ECpella strategies. ECpella was defined as Impella combined with venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Secondary analyses were conducted to evaluate factors influencing complications and mortality. Between April 2018 and December 2024, 35 patients received Impella 2.5/CP alone, 67 received ECpella (2.5/CP was used), six received Impella 5.0/5.5 alone, and 13 received ECpella (5.0/5.5 was used). Platelet counts decreased significantly over time in the Impella 2.5/CP subgroups, with a greater reduction observed in the ECpella subgroup. Significant platelet count reduction was observed in only the ECpella subgroup of the Impella 5.0/5.5 group. A haptoglobin level of <10 mg/dl was more commonly noted in the Impella-alone subgroup of the Impella 2.5/CP group and in the ECpella subgroup of the Impella 5.0/5.5 group. The platelet count on day 3 post-implantation was associated with 1 year survival in the Impella 2.5/CP group (hazard ratio: 1.174, 95% confidence interval: 1.033-1.333, p = 0.014). These findings warrant validation in larger prospective studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":8844,"journal":{"name":"ASAIO Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Platelet Dynamics During Impella Use: A Time-Series Analysis by Model and Treatment Method.\",\"authors\":\"Ikuko Shibasaki, Yasuo Haruyama, Suguru Hirose, Yusuke Takei, Shigeru Toyoda, Hirotsugu Fukuda\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/MAT.0000000000002498\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Mechanical circulatory support is the standard treatment for refractory cardiogenic shock. However, Impella-induced thrombocytopenia is an established complication, and data on its incidence and characteristics remain limited. This study compared thrombocytopenia progression between patients who received different Impella devices (2.5/CP and 5.0/5.5) using Impella-alone or ECpella strategies. ECpella was defined as Impella combined with venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Secondary analyses were conducted to evaluate factors influencing complications and mortality. Between April 2018 and December 2024, 35 patients received Impella 2.5/CP alone, 67 received ECpella (2.5/CP was used), six received Impella 5.0/5.5 alone, and 13 received ECpella (5.0/5.5 was used). Platelet counts decreased significantly over time in the Impella 2.5/CP subgroups, with a greater reduction observed in the ECpella subgroup. Significant platelet count reduction was observed in only the ECpella subgroup of the Impella 5.0/5.5 group. A haptoglobin level of <10 mg/dl was more commonly noted in the Impella-alone subgroup of the Impella 2.5/CP group and in the ECpella subgroup of the Impella 5.0/5.5 group. The platelet count on day 3 post-implantation was associated with 1 year survival in the Impella 2.5/CP group (hazard ratio: 1.174, 95% confidence interval: 1.033-1.333, p = 0.014). These findings warrant validation in larger prospective studies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8844,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ASAIO Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ASAIO Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/MAT.0000000000002498\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ASAIO Journal","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MAT.0000000000002498","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Platelet Dynamics During Impella Use: A Time-Series Analysis by Model and Treatment Method.
Mechanical circulatory support is the standard treatment for refractory cardiogenic shock. However, Impella-induced thrombocytopenia is an established complication, and data on its incidence and characteristics remain limited. This study compared thrombocytopenia progression between patients who received different Impella devices (2.5/CP and 5.0/5.5) using Impella-alone or ECpella strategies. ECpella was defined as Impella combined with venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Secondary analyses were conducted to evaluate factors influencing complications and mortality. Between April 2018 and December 2024, 35 patients received Impella 2.5/CP alone, 67 received ECpella (2.5/CP was used), six received Impella 5.0/5.5 alone, and 13 received ECpella (5.0/5.5 was used). Platelet counts decreased significantly over time in the Impella 2.5/CP subgroups, with a greater reduction observed in the ECpella subgroup. Significant platelet count reduction was observed in only the ECpella subgroup of the Impella 5.0/5.5 group. A haptoglobin level of <10 mg/dl was more commonly noted in the Impella-alone subgroup of the Impella 2.5/CP group and in the ECpella subgroup of the Impella 5.0/5.5 group. The platelet count on day 3 post-implantation was associated with 1 year survival in the Impella 2.5/CP group (hazard ratio: 1.174, 95% confidence interval: 1.033-1.333, p = 0.014). These findings warrant validation in larger prospective studies.
期刊介绍:
ASAIO Journal is in the forefront of artificial organ research and development. On the cutting edge of innovative technology, it features peer-reviewed articles of the highest quality that describe research, development, the most recent advances in the design of artificial organ devices and findings from initial testing. Bimonthly, the ASAIO Journal features state-of-the-art investigations, laboratory and clinical trials, and discussions and opinions from experts around the world.
The official publication of the American Society for Artificial Internal Organs.