神经危重症患者最佳动脉压力传感器定位:综述。

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Andrés Giglio, Monserrat Pino, Andrés Ferre, Pablo Hasbun, Sergio Aguilera, DaiWai M Olson, Raimund Helbok, Andrés Reccius
{"title":"神经危重症患者最佳动脉压力传感器定位:综述。","authors":"Andrés Giglio, Monserrat Pino, Andrés Ferre, Pablo Hasbun, Sergio Aguilera, DaiWai M Olson, Raimund Helbok, Andrés Reccius","doi":"10.1089/neu.2024.0463","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This narrative review addresses the critical issue of arterial transducer positioning for cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) measurement in neurocritical care. Despite CPP's importance in guiding management, optimal transducer placement remains ambiguous and unaddressed by current guidelines. We synthesized evidence from 20 relevant articles to inform standardization efforts. Key findings include a 10-12 mmHg CPP discrepancy between phlebostatic axis and Monro foramen transducer locations at 30° head elevation. There is no consensus on anatomical landmarks for \"head-level\" measurement, and only one guideline explicitly advises against the phlebostatic axis approach. Limited clinical evidence suggests increased institutionalization rates for patients with measurement discrepancies. Emerging dual-transducer strategies aim to address these challenges. The review highlights significant variability in CPP measurement practices, potentially impacting patient care and research interpretation. We emphasize the urgent need for standardized protocols and improved reporting in research. Addressing this variability is crucial for optimizing neurocritical care management and enhancing research comparability. Our findings underscore the importance of consistent arterial transducer positioning in neurocritical care and call for further research to establish evidence-based standardization, ultimately improving patient outcomes and research quality in this critical field.</p>","PeriodicalId":16512,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurotrauma","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimal Arterial Pressure Transducer Positioning for Neurocritical Care Patients: A Review.\",\"authors\":\"Andrés Giglio, Monserrat Pino, Andrés Ferre, Pablo Hasbun, Sergio Aguilera, DaiWai M Olson, Raimund Helbok, Andrés Reccius\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/neu.2024.0463\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This narrative review addresses the critical issue of arterial transducer positioning for cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) measurement in neurocritical care. Despite CPP's importance in guiding management, optimal transducer placement remains ambiguous and unaddressed by current guidelines. We synthesized evidence from 20 relevant articles to inform standardization efforts. Key findings include a 10-12 mmHg CPP discrepancy between phlebostatic axis and Monro foramen transducer locations at 30° head elevation. There is no consensus on anatomical landmarks for \\\"head-level\\\" measurement, and only one guideline explicitly advises against the phlebostatic axis approach. Limited clinical evidence suggests increased institutionalization rates for patients with measurement discrepancies. Emerging dual-transducer strategies aim to address these challenges. The review highlights significant variability in CPP measurement practices, potentially impacting patient care and research interpretation. We emphasize the urgent need for standardized protocols and improved reporting in research. Addressing this variability is crucial for optimizing neurocritical care management and enhancing research comparability. Our findings underscore the importance of consistent arterial transducer positioning in neurocritical care and call for further research to establish evidence-based standardization, ultimately improving patient outcomes and research quality in this critical field.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16512,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of neurotrauma\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of neurotrauma\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/neu.2024.0463\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurotrauma","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/neu.2024.0463","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文综述了在神经危重症护理中动脉换能器定位脑灌注压(CPP)测量的关键问题。尽管CPP在指导管理方面很重要,但目前的指南仍然不明确且未解决最佳换能器放置问题。我们综合了来自20篇相关文章的证据,为标准化工作提供信息。主要发现包括静压轴和Monro孔传感器在头部抬高30°位置的CPP值有10-12 mmHg差异。对于“头部水平”测量的解剖标志尚无共识,只有一份指南明确建议不采用静血轴方法。有限的临床证据表明,测量差异患者的住院率增加。新兴的双换能器战略旨在解决这些挑战。该综述强调了CPP测量实践的显著可变性,可能影响患者护理和研究解释。我们强调迫切需要标准化的方案和改进研究报告。解决这种可变性对于优化神经危重症护理管理和增强研究可比性至关重要。我们的研究结果强调了动脉换能器定位在神经危重症护理中的重要性,并呼吁进一步研究以建立基于证据的标准化,最终改善这一关键领域的患者预后和研究质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Optimal Arterial Pressure Transducer Positioning for Neurocritical Care Patients: A Review.

This narrative review addresses the critical issue of arterial transducer positioning for cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) measurement in neurocritical care. Despite CPP's importance in guiding management, optimal transducer placement remains ambiguous and unaddressed by current guidelines. We synthesized evidence from 20 relevant articles to inform standardization efforts. Key findings include a 10-12 mmHg CPP discrepancy between phlebostatic axis and Monro foramen transducer locations at 30° head elevation. There is no consensus on anatomical landmarks for "head-level" measurement, and only one guideline explicitly advises against the phlebostatic axis approach. Limited clinical evidence suggests increased institutionalization rates for patients with measurement discrepancies. Emerging dual-transducer strategies aim to address these challenges. The review highlights significant variability in CPP measurement practices, potentially impacting patient care and research interpretation. We emphasize the urgent need for standardized protocols and improved reporting in research. Addressing this variability is crucial for optimizing neurocritical care management and enhancing research comparability. Our findings underscore the importance of consistent arterial transducer positioning in neurocritical care and call for further research to establish evidence-based standardization, ultimately improving patient outcomes and research quality in this critical field.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of neurotrauma
Journal of neurotrauma 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
7.10%
发文量
233
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Neurotrauma is the flagship, peer-reviewed publication for reporting on the latest advances in both the clinical and laboratory investigation of traumatic brain and spinal cord injury. The Journal focuses on the basic pathobiology of injury to the central nervous system, while considering preclinical and clinical trials targeted at improving both the early management and long-term care and recovery of traumatically injured patients. This is the essential journal publishing cutting-edge basic and translational research in traumatically injured human and animal studies, with emphasis on neurodegenerative disease research linked to CNS trauma.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信