第二代(44通道)脉络膜上视网膜假体:2年临床试验中的手术稳定性和安全性

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Penelope J. Allen, Maria Kolic, Elizabeth K. Baglin, Samuel A. Titchener, Jessica Kvansakul, David A. X. Nayagam, Jonathan Yeoh, Robert J. Briggs, Joel Villalobos, Christopher E. Williams, Myra B. McGuinness, Chi D. Luu, Matthew A. Petoe, Carla J. Abbott, for the Bionics Institute and Centre for Eye Research Australia Retinal Prosthesis Consortium
{"title":"第二代(44通道)脉络膜上视网膜假体:2年临床试验中的手术稳定性和安全性","authors":"Penelope J. Allen,&nbsp;Maria Kolic,&nbsp;Elizabeth K. Baglin,&nbsp;Samuel A. Titchener,&nbsp;Jessica Kvansakul,&nbsp;David A. X. Nayagam,&nbsp;Jonathan Yeoh,&nbsp;Robert J. Briggs,&nbsp;Joel Villalobos,&nbsp;Christopher E. Williams,&nbsp;Myra B. McGuinness,&nbsp;Chi D. Luu,&nbsp;Matthew A. Petoe,&nbsp;Carla J. Abbott,&nbsp;for the Bionics Institute and Centre for Eye Research Australia Retinal Prosthesis Consortium","doi":"10.1111/ceo.14502","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>To assess the safety and stability profile of the suprachoroidal retinal prosthesis (ScRP) in participants with retinitis pigmentosa (RP) for 2 years from implantation.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Four participants, with advanced RP and bare-light perception vision were enrolled in a prospective, single arm unmasked interventional clinical trial and unilaterally implanted with a 44-channel ScRP (NCT03406416). Electrical stimulation commenced in the psychophysics laboratory prior to use in local environments. Outcome measures included serious adverse events, adverse events, implant stability and implant functionality to assess the safety and stability profile over 2.0–2.7 years.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Surgical procedures took 204–260 min and were uncomplicated. Postoperative recovery was uneventful. Imaging confirmed the device position under the macula and the absence of retinal trauma. There were no serious adverse events and the adverse events that occurred were mild. All electrodes were functional at surgery completion, and only 3% electrodes lost functionality by study end. There was minor array movement (translational and rotational) within the first 10–15 weeks only. The electrode to retina distance increased as expected with fibrous capsule development, but plateaued in three of four participants within 12 months. Retinal and choroidal thicknesses were consistent with the underlying retinal dystrophic disease.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The ScRP can be safely implanted in the suprachoroidal space and has minimal long-term impacts on the eye, with no SAEs and only slight array movement seen over 2.0–2.7 years. Hence, the findings indicate approach feasibility and further multicentre studies are warranted.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55253,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology","volume":"53 5","pages":"529-541"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ceo.14502","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Second-Generation (44-Channel) Suprachoroidal Retinal Prosthesis: Surgical Stability and Safety During a 2-Year Clinical Trial\",\"authors\":\"Penelope J. Allen,&nbsp;Maria Kolic,&nbsp;Elizabeth K. Baglin,&nbsp;Samuel A. Titchener,&nbsp;Jessica Kvansakul,&nbsp;David A. X. Nayagam,&nbsp;Jonathan Yeoh,&nbsp;Robert J. Briggs,&nbsp;Joel Villalobos,&nbsp;Christopher E. Williams,&nbsp;Myra B. McGuinness,&nbsp;Chi D. Luu,&nbsp;Matthew A. Petoe,&nbsp;Carla J. Abbott,&nbsp;for the Bionics Institute and Centre for Eye Research Australia Retinal Prosthesis Consortium\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ceo.14502\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>To assess the safety and stability profile of the suprachoroidal retinal prosthesis (ScRP) in participants with retinitis pigmentosa (RP) for 2 years from implantation.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Four participants, with advanced RP and bare-light perception vision were enrolled in a prospective, single arm unmasked interventional clinical trial and unilaterally implanted with a 44-channel ScRP (NCT03406416). Electrical stimulation commenced in the psychophysics laboratory prior to use in local environments. Outcome measures included serious adverse events, adverse events, implant stability and implant functionality to assess the safety and stability profile over 2.0–2.7 years.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Surgical procedures took 204–260 min and were uncomplicated. Postoperative recovery was uneventful. Imaging confirmed the device position under the macula and the absence of retinal trauma. There were no serious adverse events and the adverse events that occurred were mild. All electrodes were functional at surgery completion, and only 3% electrodes lost functionality by study end. There was minor array movement (translational and rotational) within the first 10–15 weeks only. The electrode to retina distance increased as expected with fibrous capsule development, but plateaued in three of four participants within 12 months. Retinal and choroidal thicknesses were consistent with the underlying retinal dystrophic disease.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>The ScRP can be safely implanted in the suprachoroidal space and has minimal long-term impacts on the eye, with no SAEs and only slight array movement seen over 2.0–2.7 years. Hence, the findings indicate approach feasibility and further multicentre studies are warranted.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55253,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology\",\"volume\":\"53 5\",\"pages\":\"529-541\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ceo.14502\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ceo.14502\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ceo.14502","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究背景:评估黄斑视网膜假体(ScRP)在视网膜色素变性(RP)患者植入术后2年内的安全性和稳定性。方法4名患有晚期RP和裸光感知视力的患者入组一项前瞻性单臂无遮挡介入临床试验,单侧植入44通道ScRP (NCT03406416)。电刺激首先在心理物理实验室开始,然后在当地环境中使用。结局指标包括严重不良事件、不良事件、种植体稳定性和种植体功能,以评估2.0-2.7年的安全性和稳定性。结果手术时间204 ~ 260 min,手术过程简单。术后恢复顺利。影像证实装置位于黄斑下,无视网膜损伤。无严重不良事件发生,发生的不良事件较轻。所有电极在手术结束时都具有功能,只有3%的电极在研究结束时失去功能。仅在前10-15周内有轻微的阵列移动(平移和旋转)。随着纤维囊的发育,电极到视网膜的距离如预期的那样增加,但在12个月内,4名参与者中有3名达到了稳定水平。视网膜和脉络膜厚度与潜在的视网膜营养不良疾病一致。结论ScRP可安全植入脉络膜上间隙,对眼睛的长期影响最小,在2.0 ~ 2.7年期间未发生严重不良反应,仅出现轻微的排列运动。因此,研究结果表明方法的可行性和进一步的多中心研究是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Second-Generation (44-Channel) Suprachoroidal Retinal Prosthesis: Surgical Stability and Safety During a 2-Year Clinical Trial

Second-Generation (44-Channel) Suprachoroidal Retinal Prosthesis: Surgical Stability and Safety During a 2-Year Clinical Trial

Background

To assess the safety and stability profile of the suprachoroidal retinal prosthesis (ScRP) in participants with retinitis pigmentosa (RP) for 2 years from implantation.

Methods

Four participants, with advanced RP and bare-light perception vision were enrolled in a prospective, single arm unmasked interventional clinical trial and unilaterally implanted with a 44-channel ScRP (NCT03406416). Electrical stimulation commenced in the psychophysics laboratory prior to use in local environments. Outcome measures included serious adverse events, adverse events, implant stability and implant functionality to assess the safety and stability profile over 2.0–2.7 years.

Results

Surgical procedures took 204–260 min and were uncomplicated. Postoperative recovery was uneventful. Imaging confirmed the device position under the macula and the absence of retinal trauma. There were no serious adverse events and the adverse events that occurred were mild. All electrodes were functional at surgery completion, and only 3% electrodes lost functionality by study end. There was minor array movement (translational and rotational) within the first 10–15 weeks only. The electrode to retina distance increased as expected with fibrous capsule development, but plateaued in three of four participants within 12 months. Retinal and choroidal thicknesses were consistent with the underlying retinal dystrophic disease.

Conclusions

The ScRP can be safely implanted in the suprachoroidal space and has minimal long-term impacts on the eye, with no SAEs and only slight array movement seen over 2.0–2.7 years. Hence, the findings indicate approach feasibility and further multicentre studies are warranted.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
150
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical & Experimental Ophthalmology is the official journal of The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Ophthalmologists. The journal publishes peer-reviewed original research and reviews dealing with all aspects of clinical practice and research which are international in scope and application. CEO recognises the importance of collaborative research and welcomes papers that have a direct influence on ophthalmic practice but are not unique to ophthalmology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信