Penelope J. Allen, Maria Kolic, Elizabeth K. Baglin, Samuel A. Titchener, Jessica Kvansakul, David A. X. Nayagam, Jonathan Yeoh, Robert J. Briggs, Joel Villalobos, Christopher E. Williams, Myra B. McGuinness, Chi D. Luu, Matthew A. Petoe, Carla J. Abbott, for the Bionics Institute and Centre for Eye Research Australia Retinal Prosthesis Consortium
{"title":"第二代(44通道)脉络膜上视网膜假体:2年临床试验中的手术稳定性和安全性","authors":"Penelope J. Allen, Maria Kolic, Elizabeth K. Baglin, Samuel A. Titchener, Jessica Kvansakul, David A. X. Nayagam, Jonathan Yeoh, Robert J. Briggs, Joel Villalobos, Christopher E. Williams, Myra B. McGuinness, Chi D. Luu, Matthew A. Petoe, Carla J. Abbott, for the Bionics Institute and Centre for Eye Research Australia Retinal Prosthesis Consortium","doi":"10.1111/ceo.14502","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>To assess the safety and stability profile of the suprachoroidal retinal prosthesis (ScRP) in participants with retinitis pigmentosa (RP) for 2 years from implantation.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Four participants, with advanced RP and bare-light perception vision were enrolled in a prospective, single arm unmasked interventional clinical trial and unilaterally implanted with a 44-channel ScRP (NCT03406416). Electrical stimulation commenced in the psychophysics laboratory prior to use in local environments. Outcome measures included serious adverse events, adverse events, implant stability and implant functionality to assess the safety and stability profile over 2.0–2.7 years.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Surgical procedures took 204–260 min and were uncomplicated. Postoperative recovery was uneventful. Imaging confirmed the device position under the macula and the absence of retinal trauma. There were no serious adverse events and the adverse events that occurred were mild. All electrodes were functional at surgery completion, and only 3% electrodes lost functionality by study end. There was minor array movement (translational and rotational) within the first 10–15 weeks only. The electrode to retina distance increased as expected with fibrous capsule development, but plateaued in three of four participants within 12 months. Retinal and choroidal thicknesses were consistent with the underlying retinal dystrophic disease.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The ScRP can be safely implanted in the suprachoroidal space and has minimal long-term impacts on the eye, with no SAEs and only slight array movement seen over 2.0–2.7 years. Hence, the findings indicate approach feasibility and further multicentre studies are warranted.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55253,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology","volume":"53 5","pages":"529-541"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ceo.14502","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Second-Generation (44-Channel) Suprachoroidal Retinal Prosthesis: Surgical Stability and Safety During a 2-Year Clinical Trial\",\"authors\":\"Penelope J. Allen, Maria Kolic, Elizabeth K. Baglin, Samuel A. Titchener, Jessica Kvansakul, David A. X. Nayagam, Jonathan Yeoh, Robert J. Briggs, Joel Villalobos, Christopher E. Williams, Myra B. McGuinness, Chi D. Luu, Matthew A. Petoe, Carla J. Abbott, for the Bionics Institute and Centre for Eye Research Australia Retinal Prosthesis Consortium\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ceo.14502\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>To assess the safety and stability profile of the suprachoroidal retinal prosthesis (ScRP) in participants with retinitis pigmentosa (RP) for 2 years from implantation.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Four participants, with advanced RP and bare-light perception vision were enrolled in a prospective, single arm unmasked interventional clinical trial and unilaterally implanted with a 44-channel ScRP (NCT03406416). Electrical stimulation commenced in the psychophysics laboratory prior to use in local environments. Outcome measures included serious adverse events, adverse events, implant stability and implant functionality to assess the safety and stability profile over 2.0–2.7 years.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Surgical procedures took 204–260 min and were uncomplicated. Postoperative recovery was uneventful. Imaging confirmed the device position under the macula and the absence of retinal trauma. There were no serious adverse events and the adverse events that occurred were mild. All electrodes were functional at surgery completion, and only 3% electrodes lost functionality by study end. There was minor array movement (translational and rotational) within the first 10–15 weeks only. The electrode to retina distance increased as expected with fibrous capsule development, but plateaued in three of four participants within 12 months. Retinal and choroidal thicknesses were consistent with the underlying retinal dystrophic disease.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>The ScRP can be safely implanted in the suprachoroidal space and has minimal long-term impacts on the eye, with no SAEs and only slight array movement seen over 2.0–2.7 years. Hence, the findings indicate approach feasibility and further multicentre studies are warranted.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55253,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology\",\"volume\":\"53 5\",\"pages\":\"529-541\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ceo.14502\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ceo.14502\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ceo.14502","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Second-Generation (44-Channel) Suprachoroidal Retinal Prosthesis: Surgical Stability and Safety During a 2-Year Clinical Trial
Background
To assess the safety and stability profile of the suprachoroidal retinal prosthesis (ScRP) in participants with retinitis pigmentosa (RP) for 2 years from implantation.
Methods
Four participants, with advanced RP and bare-light perception vision were enrolled in a prospective, single arm unmasked interventional clinical trial and unilaterally implanted with a 44-channel ScRP (NCT03406416). Electrical stimulation commenced in the psychophysics laboratory prior to use in local environments. Outcome measures included serious adverse events, adverse events, implant stability and implant functionality to assess the safety and stability profile over 2.0–2.7 years.
Results
Surgical procedures took 204–260 min and were uncomplicated. Postoperative recovery was uneventful. Imaging confirmed the device position under the macula and the absence of retinal trauma. There were no serious adverse events and the adverse events that occurred were mild. All electrodes were functional at surgery completion, and only 3% electrodes lost functionality by study end. There was minor array movement (translational and rotational) within the first 10–15 weeks only. The electrode to retina distance increased as expected with fibrous capsule development, but plateaued in three of four participants within 12 months. Retinal and choroidal thicknesses were consistent with the underlying retinal dystrophic disease.
Conclusions
The ScRP can be safely implanted in the suprachoroidal space and has minimal long-term impacts on the eye, with no SAEs and only slight array movement seen over 2.0–2.7 years. Hence, the findings indicate approach feasibility and further multicentre studies are warranted.
期刊介绍:
Clinical & Experimental Ophthalmology is the official journal of The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Ophthalmologists. The journal publishes peer-reviewed original research and reviews dealing with all aspects of clinical practice and research which are international in scope and application. CEO recognises the importance of collaborative research and welcomes papers that have a direct influence on ophthalmic practice but are not unique to ophthalmology.