氟替卡松呼气输送系统治疗慢性鼻窦炎的疗效:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Yeon Hee Im, Gulnaz Stybayeva, Se Hwan Hwang
{"title":"氟替卡松呼气输送系统治疗慢性鼻窦炎的疗效:系统评价和荟萃分析。","authors":"Yeon Hee Im, Gulnaz Stybayeva, Se Hwan Hwang","doi":"10.1177/00034894251349397","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Novel biomechanics of the exhalation delivery system can deliver fluticasone (EDS-FLU; XHANCE) to sinonasal areas above the inferior turbinate, especially sinus drainage pathways not reached by standard nasal sprays. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of EDS-FLU in treating chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Studies were retrieved from PubMed, SCOPUS, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases up to April 2024. We analyzed 5 studies that compared EDS-FLU with a control group (exhalation delivery system with placebo) on various outcomes, including the 22-item Sinonasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22), nasal symptom scores (congestion, facial pain, olfactory dysfunction, and rhinorrhea), nasal polyp scores, surgical indication rate, and the incidence of adverse effects.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five studies with 2129 patients were included. EDS-FLU significantly improved SNOT-22 score (-20.9657 [-23.5639; -18.3674]) and the polyp score (-1.5099 [-1.7810; -1.2388]) after 6 months. The incidence of epistaxis was significantly higher in the treatment group compared to the control group (OR = 5.7954 [2.1004; 15.9909]). Effects of EDS-FLU on polyp score (-0.6497 [-0.8186; -0.4807]), responder rate (OR = 2.1755 [1.2784; 3.7020]), complete responder rate (OR = 2.0423 [1.0109; 4.1262]), surgical indication rate (OR = 0.7313 [0.5459; 0.9797]), and SNOT-22 score (-6.1513 [-11.3054; -0.9972]) were significantly higher in the treatment group than in the control group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study demonstrated that EDS-FLU (372 µg twice daily) produced statistically significant improvements compared to EDS-placebo in multiple subjective and objective outcomes, although some adverse effects, such as epistaxis, may occur.</p>","PeriodicalId":520787,"journal":{"name":"The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology","volume":" ","pages":"34894251349397"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of the Exhalation Delivery System With Fluticasone for Chronic Rhinosinusitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Yeon Hee Im, Gulnaz Stybayeva, Se Hwan Hwang\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00034894251349397\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Novel biomechanics of the exhalation delivery system can deliver fluticasone (EDS-FLU; XHANCE) to sinonasal areas above the inferior turbinate, especially sinus drainage pathways not reached by standard nasal sprays. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of EDS-FLU in treating chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Studies were retrieved from PubMed, SCOPUS, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases up to April 2024. We analyzed 5 studies that compared EDS-FLU with a control group (exhalation delivery system with placebo) on various outcomes, including the 22-item Sinonasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22), nasal symptom scores (congestion, facial pain, olfactory dysfunction, and rhinorrhea), nasal polyp scores, surgical indication rate, and the incidence of adverse effects.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five studies with 2129 patients were included. EDS-FLU significantly improved SNOT-22 score (-20.9657 [-23.5639; -18.3674]) and the polyp score (-1.5099 [-1.7810; -1.2388]) after 6 months. The incidence of epistaxis was significantly higher in the treatment group compared to the control group (OR = 5.7954 [2.1004; 15.9909]). Effects of EDS-FLU on polyp score (-0.6497 [-0.8186; -0.4807]), responder rate (OR = 2.1755 [1.2784; 3.7020]), complete responder rate (OR = 2.0423 [1.0109; 4.1262]), surgical indication rate (OR = 0.7313 [0.5459; 0.9797]), and SNOT-22 score (-6.1513 [-11.3054; -0.9972]) were significantly higher in the treatment group than in the control group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study demonstrated that EDS-FLU (372 µg twice daily) produced statistically significant improvements compared to EDS-placebo in multiple subjective and objective outcomes, although some adverse effects, such as epistaxis, may occur.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520787,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"34894251349397\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00034894251349397\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00034894251349397","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:新型生物力学呼气给药系统能给药氟替卡松(EDS-FLU);下鼻甲以上的鼻窦区域,特别是标准鼻喷雾剂无法到达的鼻窦引流通道。本研究旨在评价EDS-FLU治疗慢性鼻窦炎(CRS)的疗效。方法:从PubMed、SCOPUS、Embase、Web of Science和Cochrane数据库检索到2024年4月的研究。我们分析了5项比较EDS-FLU与对照组(呼气输送系统与安慰剂)各种结果的研究,包括22项鼻窦结局测试(SNOT-22)、鼻症状评分(充血、面部疼痛、嗅觉功能障碍和鼻漏)、鼻息肉评分、手术指征率和不良反应发生率。结果:纳入5项研究,共2129例患者。EDS-FLU显著提高SNOT-22评分(-20.9657 [-23.5639;-18.3674])和息肉评分(-1.5099 [-1.7810;-1.2388]), 6个月后。治疗组鼻出血发生率明显高于对照组(OR = 5.7954 [2.1004;15.9909])。EDS-FLU对息肉评分的影响(-0.6497 [-0.8186;-0.4807]),应答率(OR = 2.1755 [1.2784;3.7020]),完全应答率(OR = 2.0423 [1.0109;4.1262]),手术指征率(OR = 0.7313 [0.5459;0.9797]), SNOT-22评分(-6.1513 [-11.3054;-0.9972]),治疗组显著高于对照组。结论:该研究表明,与eds -安慰剂相比,EDS-FLU(372µg,每日两次)在多个主观和客观结果上产生了统计学上显著的改善,尽管可能会出现一些不良反应,如鼻出血。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Efficacy of the Exhalation Delivery System With Fluticasone for Chronic Rhinosinusitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Objectives: Novel biomechanics of the exhalation delivery system can deliver fluticasone (EDS-FLU; XHANCE) to sinonasal areas above the inferior turbinate, especially sinus drainage pathways not reached by standard nasal sprays. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of EDS-FLU in treating chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS).

Methods: Studies were retrieved from PubMed, SCOPUS, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases up to April 2024. We analyzed 5 studies that compared EDS-FLU with a control group (exhalation delivery system with placebo) on various outcomes, including the 22-item Sinonasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22), nasal symptom scores (congestion, facial pain, olfactory dysfunction, and rhinorrhea), nasal polyp scores, surgical indication rate, and the incidence of adverse effects.

Results: Five studies with 2129 patients were included. EDS-FLU significantly improved SNOT-22 score (-20.9657 [-23.5639; -18.3674]) and the polyp score (-1.5099 [-1.7810; -1.2388]) after 6 months. The incidence of epistaxis was significantly higher in the treatment group compared to the control group (OR = 5.7954 [2.1004; 15.9909]). Effects of EDS-FLU on polyp score (-0.6497 [-0.8186; -0.4807]), responder rate (OR = 2.1755 [1.2784; 3.7020]), complete responder rate (OR = 2.0423 [1.0109; 4.1262]), surgical indication rate (OR = 0.7313 [0.5459; 0.9797]), and SNOT-22 score (-6.1513 [-11.3054; -0.9972]) were significantly higher in the treatment group than in the control group.

Conclusions: This study demonstrated that EDS-FLU (372 µg twice daily) produced statistically significant improvements compared to EDS-placebo in multiple subjective and objective outcomes, although some adverse effects, such as epistaxis, may occur.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信