立体定向头框配准基准系统的发展:过程和结果。

Farhan Khan, Nathan A Shlobin, W Elorm Yevudza, Brett E Youngerman, Guy M McKhann, Neil A Feldstein
{"title":"立体定向头框配准基准系统的发展:过程和结果。","authors":"Farhan Khan, Nathan A Shlobin, W Elorm Yevudza, Brett E Youngerman, Guy M McKhann, Neil A Feldstein","doi":"10.1227/ons.0000000000001692","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>It is critical to have fast and accurate intraoperative navigation coregistration between neuroimaging studies and the patient's cranial anatomy for functional neurosurgery procedures. Scalp-based laser or skull fiducial-based coregistration approaches have notable limitations. We have overcome these challenges by developing and manufacturing novel, noninvasive metal fiducial markers that attach directly to stereotactic head frames. We describe our development of fiducials, delineate our operative technique, and compare initial outcomes in targeting stereoelectroencephalography cases using fiducials for registration vs historical controls using a standard laser-based approach.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A system of 6 aluminum fiducial markers (\"Felducials,\" named after one of the senior authors) that are hollowed out on the apex to match the robotic registration pointer probe of the ROSA robot were developed for the Cosman-Roberts-Wells® stereotactic frame and adapted to the Leksell Vantage™ frame. The operative approach involved placement of the stereotactic head frame, acquisition of intraoperative computed tomography, merging of preoperative MRI with intraoperative computed tomography, and navigation of the registration probe to each fiducial site. Root mean square coregistration accuracy and registration time were compared between patients who underwent registration with fiducials and laser.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In our pilot comparison study, 32 patients underwent coregistration with our fiducials and 21 with standard ROSA laser-based methodology. Root mean square error was significantly lower in the fiducial group (0.38 ± 0.15) relative to the laser group (0.46 ± 0.12) ( P = .012). Registration time was also significantly lower in the fiducial group (6.28 ± 3.70 minutes) compared with the laser group (17.81 ± 8.99 minutes) ( P < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our novel noninvasive aluminum fiducial system (\"Felducials\") is compatible with common stereotactic head frame systems and readily adaptable to other stereotactic systems as they are developed. Registration of the ROSA ONE® Brain system using Felducials provided superior accuracy and registration time in comparison with the standard laser approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":520730,"journal":{"name":"Operative neurosurgery (Hagerstown, Md.)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development of a Fiducial System for Registration of Stereotactic Head Frames: Process and Outcomes.\",\"authors\":\"Farhan Khan, Nathan A Shlobin, W Elorm Yevudza, Brett E Youngerman, Guy M McKhann, Neil A Feldstein\",\"doi\":\"10.1227/ons.0000000000001692\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>It is critical to have fast and accurate intraoperative navigation coregistration between neuroimaging studies and the patient's cranial anatomy for functional neurosurgery procedures. Scalp-based laser or skull fiducial-based coregistration approaches have notable limitations. We have overcome these challenges by developing and manufacturing novel, noninvasive metal fiducial markers that attach directly to stereotactic head frames. We describe our development of fiducials, delineate our operative technique, and compare initial outcomes in targeting stereoelectroencephalography cases using fiducials for registration vs historical controls using a standard laser-based approach.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A system of 6 aluminum fiducial markers (\\\"Felducials,\\\" named after one of the senior authors) that are hollowed out on the apex to match the robotic registration pointer probe of the ROSA robot were developed for the Cosman-Roberts-Wells® stereotactic frame and adapted to the Leksell Vantage™ frame. The operative approach involved placement of the stereotactic head frame, acquisition of intraoperative computed tomography, merging of preoperative MRI with intraoperative computed tomography, and navigation of the registration probe to each fiducial site. Root mean square coregistration accuracy and registration time were compared between patients who underwent registration with fiducials and laser.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In our pilot comparison study, 32 patients underwent coregistration with our fiducials and 21 with standard ROSA laser-based methodology. Root mean square error was significantly lower in the fiducial group (0.38 ± 0.15) relative to the laser group (0.46 ± 0.12) ( P = .012). Registration time was also significantly lower in the fiducial group (6.28 ± 3.70 minutes) compared with the laser group (17.81 ± 8.99 minutes) ( P < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our novel noninvasive aluminum fiducial system (\\\"Felducials\\\") is compatible with common stereotactic head frame systems and readily adaptable to other stereotactic systems as they are developed. Registration of the ROSA ONE® Brain system using Felducials provided superior accuracy and registration time in comparison with the standard laser approach.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520730,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Operative neurosurgery (Hagerstown, Md.)\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Operative neurosurgery (Hagerstown, Md.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1227/ons.0000000000001692\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Operative neurosurgery (Hagerstown, Md.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1227/ons.0000000000001692","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:在功能神经外科手术中,快速准确地导航神经影像学研究和患者颅解剖之间的共配准是至关重要的。基于头皮的激光或基于颅骨基准的共配准方法有明显的局限性。我们已经克服了这些挑战,通过开发和制造新颖的,无创的金属基准标记,直接连接到立体定向头框架。我们描述了基准的发展,描述了我们的手术技术,并比较了使用基准进行登记的定向立体脑电图病例与使用标准激光方法进行历史对照的初步结果。方法:为Cosman-Roberts-Wells®立体定向框架和Leksell Vantage™框架开发了一个由6个铝制基准标记(“Felducials”,以一位资深作者的名字命名)组成的系统,该系统在顶端挖空,以匹配ROSA机器人的机器人配准指针探针。手术入路包括放置立体定向头框架,术中获取计算机断层扫描,术前MRI与术中计算机断层扫描合并,并将配准探头导航到每个基准部位。比较采用基准和激光登记的患者的均方根共登记精度和登记时间。结果:在我们的先导比较研究中,32名患者接受了我们的基准共登记,21名患者接受了基于标准ROSA激光方法的共登记。基准组的均方根误差(0.38±0.15)明显低于激光组(0.46±0.12)(P = 0.012)。基准组的登记时间(6.28±3.70 min)显著低于激光组(17.81±8.99 min) (P < 0.001)。结论:我们的新型无创铝基准系统(“Felducials”)与常见的立体定向头架系统兼容,并且随着其他立体定向系统的发展,很容易适应。与标准激光方法相比,使用felducals对ROSA ONE®大脑系统进行注册提供了更高的准确性和注册时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Development of a Fiducial System for Registration of Stereotactic Head Frames: Process and Outcomes.

Background and objectives: It is critical to have fast and accurate intraoperative navigation coregistration between neuroimaging studies and the patient's cranial anatomy for functional neurosurgery procedures. Scalp-based laser or skull fiducial-based coregistration approaches have notable limitations. We have overcome these challenges by developing and manufacturing novel, noninvasive metal fiducial markers that attach directly to stereotactic head frames. We describe our development of fiducials, delineate our operative technique, and compare initial outcomes in targeting stereoelectroencephalography cases using fiducials for registration vs historical controls using a standard laser-based approach.

Methods: A system of 6 aluminum fiducial markers ("Felducials," named after one of the senior authors) that are hollowed out on the apex to match the robotic registration pointer probe of the ROSA robot were developed for the Cosman-Roberts-Wells® stereotactic frame and adapted to the Leksell Vantage™ frame. The operative approach involved placement of the stereotactic head frame, acquisition of intraoperative computed tomography, merging of preoperative MRI with intraoperative computed tomography, and navigation of the registration probe to each fiducial site. Root mean square coregistration accuracy and registration time were compared between patients who underwent registration with fiducials and laser.

Results: In our pilot comparison study, 32 patients underwent coregistration with our fiducials and 21 with standard ROSA laser-based methodology. Root mean square error was significantly lower in the fiducial group (0.38 ± 0.15) relative to the laser group (0.46 ± 0.12) ( P = .012). Registration time was also significantly lower in the fiducial group (6.28 ± 3.70 minutes) compared with the laser group (17.81 ± 8.99 minutes) ( P < .001).

Conclusion: Our novel noninvasive aluminum fiducial system ("Felducials") is compatible with common stereotactic head frame systems and readily adaptable to other stereotactic systems as they are developed. Registration of the ROSA ONE® Brain system using Felducials provided superior accuracy and registration time in comparison with the standard laser approach.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信