利益相关者对建筑环境因素支持脑卒中康复和恢复日常生活的看法

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Laila de Vries, Maya Kylén, Tony Svensson, Jodi Sturge, Ruby Lipson-Smith, Steven M. Schmidt, Hélène Pessah-Rasmussen, Marie Elf
{"title":"利益相关者对建筑环境因素支持脑卒中康复和恢复日常生活的看法","authors":"Laila de Vries,&nbsp;Maya Kylén,&nbsp;Tony Svensson,&nbsp;Jodi Sturge,&nbsp;Ruby Lipson-Smith,&nbsp;Steven M. Schmidt,&nbsp;Hélène Pessah-Rasmussen,&nbsp;Marie Elf","doi":"10.1111/hex.70339","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>The transition to undertaking rehabilitation in the home or local neighbourhood calls for an extensive understanding of which aspects of the built environment are important for people with stroke.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>This qualitative study aims to explore how home and local neighbourhood environments support or hinder rehabilitation for people who have had a stroke from the perspectives of various stakeholders.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Through a purposive selection method, data were collected through semi-structured interviews with 16 stakeholders: people with stroke (<i>n</i> = 3), significant others (<i>n</i> = 3), healthcare professionals (<i>n</i> = 4), care managers (<i>n</i> = 3) and architects (<i>n</i> = 3). Content analysis was used to identify patterns and create themes.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Findings</h3>\n \n <p>Sixteen stakeholders, including 12 women and 4 men aged 30–74, participated in this study. Our findings identify areas linked to the WHO age-friendly environment framework, which addresses environmental limitations relevant to stroke rehabilitation. The categories used and factors identified: (1) Outdoor environments: accessibility, safety and supportiveness. (2) Transport and mobility: accessible and reach central services. (3) Housing: adaptations, layout and accessibility. (4) Social participation: spaces that are varied and flexible. (5) Social inclusion and non-discrimination: shared decision-making. (6) Civic engagement and employment: supporting environments. (7) Communication and information: digital accessibility. (8) Community and health services: patient-centred approach and access to varied rehabilitation.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>This study brings together multiple perspectives from key stakeholders with experience within stroke care. By integrating insights, these findings highlight how built environmental factors in the home and local neighbourhood can support the transition to home-based rehabilitation, which can improve recovery and return to everyday life. In turn, this study contributes to the innovative development of home and neighbourhood environments to influence and support stroke rehabilitation. Linking the findings to the WHO framework increases our understanding of a supportive environment for people with stroke, but also for people with other long-term conditions.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Patient or Public Contribution</h3>\n \n <p>This qualitative study is part of a comprehensive research project ‘(Built Environments to support rehabilitation for people with stroke, B-SURE)’, which aims to investigate how factors in the built environment influence stroke rehabilitation and to develop built environment solutions. B-SURE has a participatory methodology that essentially includes and involves the stakeholders in the multiple stages of the study and ensures an iterative and collaborative process.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55070,"journal":{"name":"Health Expectations","volume":"28 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/hex.70339","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Stakeholder Perspectives on Built Environmental Factors to Support Stroke Rehabilitation and Return to Everyday Life\",\"authors\":\"Laila de Vries,&nbsp;Maya Kylén,&nbsp;Tony Svensson,&nbsp;Jodi Sturge,&nbsp;Ruby Lipson-Smith,&nbsp;Steven M. Schmidt,&nbsp;Hélène Pessah-Rasmussen,&nbsp;Marie Elf\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/hex.70339\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>The transition to undertaking rehabilitation in the home or local neighbourhood calls for an extensive understanding of which aspects of the built environment are important for people with stroke.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objective</h3>\\n \\n <p>This qualitative study aims to explore how home and local neighbourhood environments support or hinder rehabilitation for people who have had a stroke from the perspectives of various stakeholders.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Through a purposive selection method, data were collected through semi-structured interviews with 16 stakeholders: people with stroke (<i>n</i> = 3), significant others (<i>n</i> = 3), healthcare professionals (<i>n</i> = 4), care managers (<i>n</i> = 3) and architects (<i>n</i> = 3). Content analysis was used to identify patterns and create themes.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Findings</h3>\\n \\n <p>Sixteen stakeholders, including 12 women and 4 men aged 30–74, participated in this study. Our findings identify areas linked to the WHO age-friendly environment framework, which addresses environmental limitations relevant to stroke rehabilitation. The categories used and factors identified: (1) Outdoor environments: accessibility, safety and supportiveness. (2) Transport and mobility: accessible and reach central services. (3) Housing: adaptations, layout and accessibility. (4) Social participation: spaces that are varied and flexible. (5) Social inclusion and non-discrimination: shared decision-making. (6) Civic engagement and employment: supporting environments. (7) Communication and information: digital accessibility. (8) Community and health services: patient-centred approach and access to varied rehabilitation.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>This study brings together multiple perspectives from key stakeholders with experience within stroke care. By integrating insights, these findings highlight how built environmental factors in the home and local neighbourhood can support the transition to home-based rehabilitation, which can improve recovery and return to everyday life. In turn, this study contributes to the innovative development of home and neighbourhood environments to influence and support stroke rehabilitation. Linking the findings to the WHO framework increases our understanding of a supportive environment for people with stroke, but also for people with other long-term conditions.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Patient or Public Contribution</h3>\\n \\n <p>This qualitative study is part of a comprehensive research project ‘(Built Environments to support rehabilitation for people with stroke, B-SURE)’, which aims to investigate how factors in the built environment influence stroke rehabilitation and to develop built environment solutions. B-SURE has a participatory methodology that essentially includes and involves the stakeholders in the multiple stages of the study and ensures an iterative and collaborative process.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55070,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Expectations\",\"volume\":\"28 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/hex.70339\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Expectations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/hex.70339\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Expectations","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/hex.70339","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在家中或当地社区进行康复的过渡需要广泛了解建筑环境的哪些方面对中风患者很重要。目的本定性研究旨在从不同利益相关者的角度探讨家庭和当地社区环境如何支持或阻碍脑卒中患者的康复。方法采用有目的的选择方法,对16名利益相关者进行半结构化访谈,收集数据:中风患者(n = 3)、重要他人(n = 3)、医疗保健专业人员(n = 4)、护理经理(n = 3)和建筑师(n = 3)。内容分析用于识别模式和创建主题。16名利益相关者参与了本研究,其中女性12人,男性4人,年龄在30-74岁之间。我们的研究结果确定了与世卫组织老年人友好环境框架相关的领域,该框架解决了与中风康复相关的环境限制。使用的类别和确定的因素:(1)户外环境:可达性、安全性和支持性。(2)交通和机动性:无障碍和可达的中心服务。(3)住房:适应性、布局和可达性。(4)社会参与:多样而灵活的空间。(5)社会包容和非歧视:共同决策。(6)公民参与和就业:支持性环境。(7)通信和信息:数字化无障碍。(8)社区和保健服务:以病人为中心的做法和获得各种康复的机会。结论:本研究汇集了具有卒中护理经验的关键利益相关者的多个观点。通过整合见解,这些发现强调了家庭和当地社区的建筑环境因素如何支持向以家庭为基础的康复过渡,这可以改善康复并恢复日常生活。进而,本研究有助于家庭和社区环境的创新发展,以影响和支持脑卒中康复。将这些发现与世卫组织框架联系起来,可以增进我们对卒中患者以及其他长期疾病患者支持性环境的理解。这项定性研究是一个综合性研究项目的一部分(建筑环境支持中风患者康复,B-SURE),旨在调查建筑环境中的因素如何影响中风康复,并制定建筑环境解决方案。B-SURE采用参与式方法,本质上包括并涉及研究的多个阶段的利益相关者,并确保迭代和协作过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Stakeholder Perspectives on Built Environmental Factors to Support Stroke Rehabilitation and Return to Everyday Life

Stakeholder Perspectives on Built Environmental Factors to Support Stroke Rehabilitation and Return to Everyday Life

Background

The transition to undertaking rehabilitation in the home or local neighbourhood calls for an extensive understanding of which aspects of the built environment are important for people with stroke.

Objective

This qualitative study aims to explore how home and local neighbourhood environments support or hinder rehabilitation for people who have had a stroke from the perspectives of various stakeholders.

Methods

Through a purposive selection method, data were collected through semi-structured interviews with 16 stakeholders: people with stroke (n = 3), significant others (n = 3), healthcare professionals (n = 4), care managers (n = 3) and architects (n = 3). Content analysis was used to identify patterns and create themes.

Findings

Sixteen stakeholders, including 12 women and 4 men aged 30–74, participated in this study. Our findings identify areas linked to the WHO age-friendly environment framework, which addresses environmental limitations relevant to stroke rehabilitation. The categories used and factors identified: (1) Outdoor environments: accessibility, safety and supportiveness. (2) Transport and mobility: accessible and reach central services. (3) Housing: adaptations, layout and accessibility. (4) Social participation: spaces that are varied and flexible. (5) Social inclusion and non-discrimination: shared decision-making. (6) Civic engagement and employment: supporting environments. (7) Communication and information: digital accessibility. (8) Community and health services: patient-centred approach and access to varied rehabilitation.

Conclusion

This study brings together multiple perspectives from key stakeholders with experience within stroke care. By integrating insights, these findings highlight how built environmental factors in the home and local neighbourhood can support the transition to home-based rehabilitation, which can improve recovery and return to everyday life. In turn, this study contributes to the innovative development of home and neighbourhood environments to influence and support stroke rehabilitation. Linking the findings to the WHO framework increases our understanding of a supportive environment for people with stroke, but also for people with other long-term conditions.

Patient or Public Contribution

This qualitative study is part of a comprehensive research project ‘(Built Environments to support rehabilitation for people with stroke, B-SURE)’, which aims to investigate how factors in the built environment influence stroke rehabilitation and to develop built environment solutions. B-SURE has a participatory methodology that essentially includes and involves the stakeholders in the multiple stages of the study and ensures an iterative and collaborative process.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Health Expectations
Health Expectations 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
9.40%
发文量
251
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Expectations promotes critical thinking and informed debate about all aspects of patient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE) in health and social care, health policy and health services research including: • Person-centred care and quality improvement • Patients'' participation in decisions about disease prevention and management • Public perceptions of health services • Citizen involvement in health care policy making and priority-setting • Methods for monitoring and evaluating participation • Empowerment and consumerism • Patients'' role in safety and quality • Patient and public role in health services research • Co-production (researchers working with patients and the public) of research, health care and policy Health Expectations is a quarterly, peer-reviewed journal publishing original research, review articles and critical commentaries. It includes papers which clarify concepts, develop theories, and critically analyse and evaluate specific policies and practices. The Journal provides an inter-disciplinary and international forum in which researchers (including PPIE researchers) from a range of backgrounds and expertise can present their work to other researchers, policy-makers, health care professionals, managers, patients and consumer advocates.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信