导航权衡:欧洲议会辩论中的能源依赖、地缘政治冲击和可持续性

IF 6.9 2区 经济学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Francesco Albanese
{"title":"导航权衡:欧洲议会辩论中的能源依赖、地缘政治冲击和可持续性","authors":"Francesco Albanese","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2025.104198","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study examines the evolution of energy and sustainability debates in European parliaments from 2014 to 2022, focusing on how national energy dependency moderates responses to geopolitical shocks, specifically, the Russian invasion of Ukraine. The research uses quantitative text analysis via the BERTopic model to compare the allocation of parliamentary attention between immediate energy security concerns and long-term sustainability objectives. The analysis finds that, following the escalation of the conflict, countries with a higher reliance on imported energy allocate a comparatively smaller share of their debates to sustainability issues, as evidenced by decreased legislative engagement with the Sustainable Development Goals. This pattern suggests that structural vulnerabilities in energy supply might restrict legislative capacity to uphold long-term sustainability commitments as short-term security imperatives increase. It highlights the importance of policy approaches that effectively combine immediate energy security measures with long-term sustainability strategies to strengthen national resilience.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":"127 ","pages":"Article 104198"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Navigating trade-offs: Energy dependency, geopolitical shocks, and sustainability in European parliamentary debates\",\"authors\":\"Francesco Albanese\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.erss.2025.104198\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study examines the evolution of energy and sustainability debates in European parliaments from 2014 to 2022, focusing on how national energy dependency moderates responses to geopolitical shocks, specifically, the Russian invasion of Ukraine. The research uses quantitative text analysis via the BERTopic model to compare the allocation of parliamentary attention between immediate energy security concerns and long-term sustainability objectives. The analysis finds that, following the escalation of the conflict, countries with a higher reliance on imported energy allocate a comparatively smaller share of their debates to sustainability issues, as evidenced by decreased legislative engagement with the Sustainable Development Goals. This pattern suggests that structural vulnerabilities in energy supply might restrict legislative capacity to uphold long-term sustainability commitments as short-term security imperatives increase. It highlights the importance of policy approaches that effectively combine immediate energy security measures with long-term sustainability strategies to strengthen national resilience.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48384,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy Research & Social Science\",\"volume\":\"127 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104198\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy Research & Social Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629625002798\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Research & Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629625002798","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究考察了2014年至2022年欧洲议会中能源和可持续性辩论的演变,重点关注国家能源依赖如何缓和对地缘政治冲击的反应,特别是俄罗斯入侵乌克兰。该研究通过BERTopic模型使用定量文本分析来比较议会在当前能源安全问题和长期可持续性目标之间的注意力分配。分析发现,在冲突升级之后,对进口能源依赖程度较高的国家在可持续性问题上的辩论所占比例相对较小,这一点从可持续发展目标的立法参与程度下降就可以看出。这种模式表明,随着短期安全需求的增加,能源供应的结构性脆弱性可能会限制立法机构维持长期可持续性承诺的能力。报告强调了将当前能源安全措施与长期可持续性战略有效结合起来的政策方法的重要性,以增强国家的抵御能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Navigating trade-offs: Energy dependency, geopolitical shocks, and sustainability in European parliamentary debates
This study examines the evolution of energy and sustainability debates in European parliaments from 2014 to 2022, focusing on how national energy dependency moderates responses to geopolitical shocks, specifically, the Russian invasion of Ukraine. The research uses quantitative text analysis via the BERTopic model to compare the allocation of parliamentary attention between immediate energy security concerns and long-term sustainability objectives. The analysis finds that, following the escalation of the conflict, countries with a higher reliance on imported energy allocate a comparatively smaller share of their debates to sustainability issues, as evidenced by decreased legislative engagement with the Sustainable Development Goals. This pattern suggests that structural vulnerabilities in energy supply might restrict legislative capacity to uphold long-term sustainability commitments as short-term security imperatives increase. It highlights the importance of policy approaches that effectively combine immediate energy security measures with long-term sustainability strategies to strengthen national resilience.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Energy Research & Social Science
Energy Research & Social Science ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
14.00
自引率
16.40%
发文量
441
审稿时长
55 days
期刊介绍: Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) is a peer-reviewed international journal that publishes original research and review articles examining the relationship between energy systems and society. ERSS covers a range of topics revolving around the intersection of energy technologies, fuels, and resources on one side and social processes and influences - including communities of energy users, people affected by energy production, social institutions, customs, traditions, behaviors, and policies - on the other. Put another way, ERSS investigates the social system surrounding energy technology and hardware. ERSS is relevant for energy practitioners, researchers interested in the social aspects of energy production or use, and policymakers. Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) provides an interdisciplinary forum to discuss how social and technical issues related to energy production and consumption interact. Energy production, distribution, and consumption all have both technical and human components, and the latter involves the human causes and consequences of energy-related activities and processes as well as social structures that shape how people interact with energy systems. Energy analysis, therefore, needs to look beyond the dimensions of technology and economics to include these social and human elements.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信