{"title":"导航权衡:欧洲议会辩论中的能源依赖、地缘政治冲击和可持续性","authors":"Francesco Albanese","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2025.104198","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study examines the evolution of energy and sustainability debates in European parliaments from 2014 to 2022, focusing on how national energy dependency moderates responses to geopolitical shocks, specifically, the Russian invasion of Ukraine. The research uses quantitative text analysis via the BERTopic model to compare the allocation of parliamentary attention between immediate energy security concerns and long-term sustainability objectives. The analysis finds that, following the escalation of the conflict, countries with a higher reliance on imported energy allocate a comparatively smaller share of their debates to sustainability issues, as evidenced by decreased legislative engagement with the Sustainable Development Goals. This pattern suggests that structural vulnerabilities in energy supply might restrict legislative capacity to uphold long-term sustainability commitments as short-term security imperatives increase. It highlights the importance of policy approaches that effectively combine immediate energy security measures with long-term sustainability strategies to strengthen national resilience.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":"127 ","pages":"Article 104198"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Navigating trade-offs: Energy dependency, geopolitical shocks, and sustainability in European parliamentary debates\",\"authors\":\"Francesco Albanese\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.erss.2025.104198\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study examines the evolution of energy and sustainability debates in European parliaments from 2014 to 2022, focusing on how national energy dependency moderates responses to geopolitical shocks, specifically, the Russian invasion of Ukraine. The research uses quantitative text analysis via the BERTopic model to compare the allocation of parliamentary attention between immediate energy security concerns and long-term sustainability objectives. The analysis finds that, following the escalation of the conflict, countries with a higher reliance on imported energy allocate a comparatively smaller share of their debates to sustainability issues, as evidenced by decreased legislative engagement with the Sustainable Development Goals. This pattern suggests that structural vulnerabilities in energy supply might restrict legislative capacity to uphold long-term sustainability commitments as short-term security imperatives increase. It highlights the importance of policy approaches that effectively combine immediate energy security measures with long-term sustainability strategies to strengthen national resilience.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48384,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy Research & Social Science\",\"volume\":\"127 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104198\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy Research & Social Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629625002798\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Research & Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629625002798","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Navigating trade-offs: Energy dependency, geopolitical shocks, and sustainability in European parliamentary debates
This study examines the evolution of energy and sustainability debates in European parliaments from 2014 to 2022, focusing on how national energy dependency moderates responses to geopolitical shocks, specifically, the Russian invasion of Ukraine. The research uses quantitative text analysis via the BERTopic model to compare the allocation of parliamentary attention between immediate energy security concerns and long-term sustainability objectives. The analysis finds that, following the escalation of the conflict, countries with a higher reliance on imported energy allocate a comparatively smaller share of their debates to sustainability issues, as evidenced by decreased legislative engagement with the Sustainable Development Goals. This pattern suggests that structural vulnerabilities in energy supply might restrict legislative capacity to uphold long-term sustainability commitments as short-term security imperatives increase. It highlights the importance of policy approaches that effectively combine immediate energy security measures with long-term sustainability strategies to strengthen national resilience.
期刊介绍:
Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) is a peer-reviewed international journal that publishes original research and review articles examining the relationship between energy systems and society. ERSS covers a range of topics revolving around the intersection of energy technologies, fuels, and resources on one side and social processes and influences - including communities of energy users, people affected by energy production, social institutions, customs, traditions, behaviors, and policies - on the other. Put another way, ERSS investigates the social system surrounding energy technology and hardware. ERSS is relevant for energy practitioners, researchers interested in the social aspects of energy production or use, and policymakers.
Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) provides an interdisciplinary forum to discuss how social and technical issues related to energy production and consumption interact. Energy production, distribution, and consumption all have both technical and human components, and the latter involves the human causes and consequences of energy-related activities and processes as well as social structures that shape how people interact with energy systems. Energy analysis, therefore, needs to look beyond the dimensions of technology and economics to include these social and human elements.