Ryan J Crowley, Jag S Lally, David M Kline, Amanda M Bunting
{"title":"美国远程医疗医师的地理空间分析。","authors":"Ryan J Crowley, Jag S Lally, David M Kline, Amanda M Bunting","doi":"10.1089/tmj.2025.0160","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Telemedicine can increase care access and may be particularly helpful for rural patients. We sought to conduct a geospatial analysis of telemedicine physicians in the United States with attention to urban-rural and specialty-level differences. <b>Methods:</b> We used the Doctors and Clinicians national downloadable file. We assessed urban-rural differences in telemedicine physician density, categorized by Rural-Urban Continuum Codes. We analyzed telemedicine physician distribution using spatial clustering and choropleth graphs. <b>Results:</b> Our cohort comprised 660,537 physicians, of whom 136,462 (20.7%) offered telemedicine services. Physicians offering telemedicine services were less likely to practice in rural environments (<i>p</i>-value < 0.001) than nontelemedicine physicians. There were clusters of low telemedicine physician density in the South. <b>Discussion:</b> Telemedicine physicians were less likely to practice in rural areas, which may exacerbate health care disparities. Targeted interventions to increase telemedicine accessibility in rural and underserved areas should be pursued.</p>","PeriodicalId":520784,"journal":{"name":"Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Geospatial Analysis of Telemedicine Physicians in the United States.\",\"authors\":\"Ryan J Crowley, Jag S Lally, David M Kline, Amanda M Bunting\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/tmj.2025.0160\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Telemedicine can increase care access and may be particularly helpful for rural patients. We sought to conduct a geospatial analysis of telemedicine physicians in the United States with attention to urban-rural and specialty-level differences. <b>Methods:</b> We used the Doctors and Clinicians national downloadable file. We assessed urban-rural differences in telemedicine physician density, categorized by Rural-Urban Continuum Codes. We analyzed telemedicine physician distribution using spatial clustering and choropleth graphs. <b>Results:</b> Our cohort comprised 660,537 physicians, of whom 136,462 (20.7%) offered telemedicine services. Physicians offering telemedicine services were less likely to practice in rural environments (<i>p</i>-value < 0.001) than nontelemedicine physicians. There were clusters of low telemedicine physician density in the South. <b>Discussion:</b> Telemedicine physicians were less likely to practice in rural areas, which may exacerbate health care disparities. Targeted interventions to increase telemedicine accessibility in rural and underserved areas should be pursued.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520784,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2025.0160\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2025.0160","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Geospatial Analysis of Telemedicine Physicians in the United States.
Background: Telemedicine can increase care access and may be particularly helpful for rural patients. We sought to conduct a geospatial analysis of telemedicine physicians in the United States with attention to urban-rural and specialty-level differences. Methods: We used the Doctors and Clinicians national downloadable file. We assessed urban-rural differences in telemedicine physician density, categorized by Rural-Urban Continuum Codes. We analyzed telemedicine physician distribution using spatial clustering and choropleth graphs. Results: Our cohort comprised 660,537 physicians, of whom 136,462 (20.7%) offered telemedicine services. Physicians offering telemedicine services were less likely to practice in rural environments (p-value < 0.001) than nontelemedicine physicians. There were clusters of low telemedicine physician density in the South. Discussion: Telemedicine physicians were less likely to practice in rural areas, which may exacerbate health care disparities. Targeted interventions to increase telemedicine accessibility in rural and underserved areas should be pursued.