Elizabeth L McQuaid, David Barker, Elizabeth S Chen, Maria T Coutinho, Grace K Cushman, Linnea Drew, A Rani Elwy, Cynthia A Esteban, Barbara N Jandasek, Sheryl J Kopel, Deborah Pearlman, Ronald Seifer, Patrick Vivier, Daphne Koinis-Mitchell
{"title":"通过RI-AIR的社区方法解决儿童哮喘差异:一项随机试验。","authors":"Elizabeth L McQuaid, David Barker, Elizabeth S Chen, Maria T Coutinho, Grace K Cushman, Linnea Drew, A Rani Elwy, Cynthia A Esteban, Barbara N Jandasek, Sheryl J Kopel, Deborah Pearlman, Ronald Seifer, Patrick Vivier, Daphne Koinis-Mitchell","doi":"10.1513/AnnalsATS.202501-016OC","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Rationale: </strong>Clustering of social and environmental risks in low-income neighborhoods is a key factor in racial and ethnic asthma disparities. Integrating school and in-home programs, with treatment tailored to disease risk, is a promising approach for children with high disease burden.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We evaluated the Rhode Island-Asthma Integrated Response (RI-AIR) Program in improving asthma outcomes at the individual and community levels. RI-AIR leverages existing community collaborations and technological advances to identify children with asthma at highest risk for poor outcomes through a system of identification, screening, and intervention.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a stepped wedge cluster randomized hybrid type-II effectiveness-implementation study. School-based catchment areas (n=32) of high asthma burden were identified using geospatial mapping of asthma-related urgent healthcare use from 2010-2018. Families received only school-based interventions if the child's asthma was Not Well Controlled or school and home-based interventions if the child's asthma was Poorly Controlled. Community Health Workers facilitated communication between families, schools, and healthcare providers. Follow-ups occurred every 3 months to 1-year post-intervention.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Individual level: At 3-months, asthma control (primary outcome) improved (d=0.47 [95% confidence interval = 0.33; 0.61]) and symptom-free days increased (d=0.37 [0.24; 0.51]); both were sustained at 12 months. Community level: Healthcare utilization remained the same or increased (RR = 1.16 [1.00; 1.36]); however, sensitivity analyses indicated utilization was slightly lower in areas with greater family participation (penetration; active=0.93 [0.87; 0.99]; post=0.91 [0.86; 0.97]).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Intensive, multi-component interventions and community engagement are needed to improve asthma outcomes in areas of high burden.</p>","PeriodicalId":93876,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the American Thoracic Society","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Addressing Pediatric Asthma Disparities through RI-AIR's Community Approach: A Randomized Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Elizabeth L McQuaid, David Barker, Elizabeth S Chen, Maria T Coutinho, Grace K Cushman, Linnea Drew, A Rani Elwy, Cynthia A Esteban, Barbara N Jandasek, Sheryl J Kopel, Deborah Pearlman, Ronald Seifer, Patrick Vivier, Daphne Koinis-Mitchell\",\"doi\":\"10.1513/AnnalsATS.202501-016OC\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Rationale: </strong>Clustering of social and environmental risks in low-income neighborhoods is a key factor in racial and ethnic asthma disparities. Integrating school and in-home programs, with treatment tailored to disease risk, is a promising approach for children with high disease burden.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We evaluated the Rhode Island-Asthma Integrated Response (RI-AIR) Program in improving asthma outcomes at the individual and community levels. RI-AIR leverages existing community collaborations and technological advances to identify children with asthma at highest risk for poor outcomes through a system of identification, screening, and intervention.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a stepped wedge cluster randomized hybrid type-II effectiveness-implementation study. School-based catchment areas (n=32) of high asthma burden were identified using geospatial mapping of asthma-related urgent healthcare use from 2010-2018. Families received only school-based interventions if the child's asthma was Not Well Controlled or school and home-based interventions if the child's asthma was Poorly Controlled. Community Health Workers facilitated communication between families, schools, and healthcare providers. Follow-ups occurred every 3 months to 1-year post-intervention.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Individual level: At 3-months, asthma control (primary outcome) improved (d=0.47 [95% confidence interval = 0.33; 0.61]) and symptom-free days increased (d=0.37 [0.24; 0.51]); both were sustained at 12 months. Community level: Healthcare utilization remained the same or increased (RR = 1.16 [1.00; 1.36]); however, sensitivity analyses indicated utilization was slightly lower in areas with greater family participation (penetration; active=0.93 [0.87; 0.99]; post=0.91 [0.86; 0.97]).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Intensive, multi-component interventions and community engagement are needed to improve asthma outcomes in areas of high burden.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93876,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of the American Thoracic Society\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of the American Thoracic Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1513/AnnalsATS.202501-016OC\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of the American Thoracic Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1513/AnnalsATS.202501-016OC","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Addressing Pediatric Asthma Disparities through RI-AIR's Community Approach: A Randomized Trial.
Rationale: Clustering of social and environmental risks in low-income neighborhoods is a key factor in racial and ethnic asthma disparities. Integrating school and in-home programs, with treatment tailored to disease risk, is a promising approach for children with high disease burden.
Objectives: We evaluated the Rhode Island-Asthma Integrated Response (RI-AIR) Program in improving asthma outcomes at the individual and community levels. RI-AIR leverages existing community collaborations and technological advances to identify children with asthma at highest risk for poor outcomes through a system of identification, screening, and intervention.
Methods: We conducted a stepped wedge cluster randomized hybrid type-II effectiveness-implementation study. School-based catchment areas (n=32) of high asthma burden were identified using geospatial mapping of asthma-related urgent healthcare use from 2010-2018. Families received only school-based interventions if the child's asthma was Not Well Controlled or school and home-based interventions if the child's asthma was Poorly Controlled. Community Health Workers facilitated communication between families, schools, and healthcare providers. Follow-ups occurred every 3 months to 1-year post-intervention.
Results: Individual level: At 3-months, asthma control (primary outcome) improved (d=0.47 [95% confidence interval = 0.33; 0.61]) and symptom-free days increased (d=0.37 [0.24; 0.51]); both were sustained at 12 months. Community level: Healthcare utilization remained the same or increased (RR = 1.16 [1.00; 1.36]); however, sensitivity analyses indicated utilization was slightly lower in areas with greater family participation (penetration; active=0.93 [0.87; 0.99]; post=0.91 [0.86; 0.97]).
Conclusions: Intensive, multi-component interventions and community engagement are needed to improve asthma outcomes in areas of high burden.