在移动健康应用程序中使用简化的奥马哈系统条款的土耳其验证。

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 NURSING
Selda Secginli, Merve Altiner Yas, Robin R Austin, Karen A Monsen
{"title":"在移动健康应用程序中使用简化的奥马哈系统条款的土耳其验证。","authors":"Selda Secginli, Merve Altiner Yas, Robin R Austin, Karen A Monsen","doi":"10.1891/RTNP-2024-0172","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background and Purpose:</b> Most mobile health applications may be unstandardized and have not been simplified for use by a wide range of community users. Therefore, it can potentially affect data quality due to a lack of validated translation and cross-cultural adaptation. This study aimed to evaluate the validity of the Turkish version of the Simplified Omaha System Terms (T-SOST) for use within a consumer-facing application, MyStrengths MyHealth (MSMH). <b>Methods:</b> The descriptive study comprised three phases: (a) language validity, (b) content validity, and (c) readability assessment and pilot testing. A total of 20 experts assessed the content validity. The Ateşman Readability Formula was used to conduct the readability assessment of T-SOST. The MSMH was used by 74 participants to test the T-SOST in the study. <b>Results:</b> The scale-level content validity index of T-SOST ranged from 0.963 to 0.999. The reading level of T-SOST averaged 82.66 ± 15.62. In the pilot test, the most frequently reported strengths were <i>Speech and Language</i> (f = 67) and <i>Cleaning</i> (f = 63). The most frequent challenges were for <i>Emotions</i> (f = 177) and <i>Income</i> (f = 95). Information/guidance was the most frequent need for <i>Emotions</i> (f = 19). Check-ins were the most frequent need for <i>Income</i> (f = 17). <b>Implications for Nursing Practice:</b> The T-SOST had acceptable psychometric properties and was found to be understandable for secondary education. It is suitable for self-reported strengths, challenges, and needs embedded in MSMH. Consumer-generated data may allow individuals to directly participate in their own health and provide insight for nurses and other clinicians to tailor interventions from a patient-centered perspective.</p>","PeriodicalId":51287,"journal":{"name":"Research and Theory for Nursing Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Turkish Validation of the Simplified Omaha System Terms for Use Within a Mobile Health Application.\",\"authors\":\"Selda Secginli, Merve Altiner Yas, Robin R Austin, Karen A Monsen\",\"doi\":\"10.1891/RTNP-2024-0172\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background and Purpose:</b> Most mobile health applications may be unstandardized and have not been simplified for use by a wide range of community users. Therefore, it can potentially affect data quality due to a lack of validated translation and cross-cultural adaptation. This study aimed to evaluate the validity of the Turkish version of the Simplified Omaha System Terms (T-SOST) for use within a consumer-facing application, MyStrengths MyHealth (MSMH). <b>Methods:</b> The descriptive study comprised three phases: (a) language validity, (b) content validity, and (c) readability assessment and pilot testing. A total of 20 experts assessed the content validity. The Ateşman Readability Formula was used to conduct the readability assessment of T-SOST. The MSMH was used by 74 participants to test the T-SOST in the study. <b>Results:</b> The scale-level content validity index of T-SOST ranged from 0.963 to 0.999. The reading level of T-SOST averaged 82.66 ± 15.62. In the pilot test, the most frequently reported strengths were <i>Speech and Language</i> (f = 67) and <i>Cleaning</i> (f = 63). The most frequent challenges were for <i>Emotions</i> (f = 177) and <i>Income</i> (f = 95). Information/guidance was the most frequent need for <i>Emotions</i> (f = 19). Check-ins were the most frequent need for <i>Income</i> (f = 17). <b>Implications for Nursing Practice:</b> The T-SOST had acceptable psychometric properties and was found to be understandable for secondary education. It is suitable for self-reported strengths, challenges, and needs embedded in MSMH. Consumer-generated data may allow individuals to directly participate in their own health and provide insight for nurses and other clinicians to tailor interventions from a patient-centered perspective.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51287,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research and Theory for Nursing Practice\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research and Theory for Nursing Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1891/RTNP-2024-0172\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research and Theory for Nursing Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1891/RTNP-2024-0172","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:大多数移动医疗应用程序可能没有标准化,也没有简化以供广泛的社区用户使用。因此,由于缺乏有效的翻译和跨文化适应,它可能会潜在地影响数据质量。本研究旨在评估土耳其语版简化奥马哈系统术语(T-SOST)在面向消费者的应用程序MyStrengths MyHealth (MSMH)中使用的有效性。方法:描述性研究包括三个阶段:(a)语言效度,(b)内容效度,(c)可读性评估和试点测试。共有20名专家对内容效度进行了评估。采用ate可读性公式对T-SOST进行可读性评价。本研究采用MSMH对74名被试进行T-SOST测试。结果:T-SOST量表水平内容效度指数范围为0.963 ~ 0.999。T-SOST读数平均值为82.66±15.62。在试点测试中,最常报告的优势是语音和语言(f = 67)和清洁(f = 63)。最常见的挑战是情绪(f = 177)和收入(f = 95)。信息/指导是情感最常见的需求(f = 19)。签到是收入最常见的需求(f = 17)。对护理实践的启示:T-SOST具有可接受的心理测量特性,并且发现对于中等教育是可以理解的。它适用于MSMH中嵌入的自我报告的优势、挑战和需求。消费者生成的数据可以让个人直接参与自己的健康,并为护士和其他临床医生提供洞察力,从以患者为中心的角度量身定制干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Turkish Validation of the Simplified Omaha System Terms for Use Within a Mobile Health Application.

Background and Purpose: Most mobile health applications may be unstandardized and have not been simplified for use by a wide range of community users. Therefore, it can potentially affect data quality due to a lack of validated translation and cross-cultural adaptation. This study aimed to evaluate the validity of the Turkish version of the Simplified Omaha System Terms (T-SOST) for use within a consumer-facing application, MyStrengths MyHealth (MSMH). Methods: The descriptive study comprised three phases: (a) language validity, (b) content validity, and (c) readability assessment and pilot testing. A total of 20 experts assessed the content validity. The Ateşman Readability Formula was used to conduct the readability assessment of T-SOST. The MSMH was used by 74 participants to test the T-SOST in the study. Results: The scale-level content validity index of T-SOST ranged from 0.963 to 0.999. The reading level of T-SOST averaged 82.66 ± 15.62. In the pilot test, the most frequently reported strengths were Speech and Language (f = 67) and Cleaning (f = 63). The most frequent challenges were for Emotions (f = 177) and Income (f = 95). Information/guidance was the most frequent need for Emotions (f = 19). Check-ins were the most frequent need for Income (f = 17). Implications for Nursing Practice: The T-SOST had acceptable psychometric properties and was found to be understandable for secondary education. It is suitable for self-reported strengths, challenges, and needs embedded in MSMH. Consumer-generated data may allow individuals to directly participate in their own health and provide insight for nurses and other clinicians to tailor interventions from a patient-centered perspective.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Research and Theory for Nursing Practice focuses on issues relevant to improving nursing practice, education, and patient care. The articles strive to discuss knowledge development in its broadest sense, reflect research using a variety of methodological approaches, and combine several methods and strategies in a single study. Because of the journal''s international emphasis, article contributors address the implications of their studies for an international audience.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信