Katja B Last, Maria Skovbjerg Slot, Hans Malte, Emil Rindom, Kasper Hansen, Tobias Wang
{"title":"缅甸蟒蛇肠道的表型灵活性在能量上是廉价的:摄食频率不影响生长效率。","authors":"Katja B Last, Maria Skovbjerg Slot, Hans Malte, Emil Rindom, Kasper Hansen, Tobias Wang","doi":"10.1242/jeb.250083","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The overall energetic expenditure related to the upregulation and downregulation of the mass and function of the gastrointestinal (GI) organs in response to feeding and fasting in vertebrates has attracted great interest. While it is generally considered energetically favourable to downregulate intestinal mass when food is scarce, very few direct experimental studies address the actual costs. Here, we specifically address the costs of phenotypic flexibility by comparing growth, body composition and oxygen consumption of snakes fed on two different feeding regimes. One group was fed intermittently to allow for the gut to be downregulated during the fasting intervals, while the other group was fed more continuously to maintain a chronic upregulated GI tract. We demonstrate that these two feeding regimes result in very similar growth, growth efficiency and overall oxygen consumption, and thus point to upregulation and maintenance of the GI tract being energetically inexpensive. These findings challenge the prevailing assumption that maintaining a functional GI tract is metabolically costly. Although replenishing and maintaining a functional GI tract probably incurs some energetic cost, it probably represents only a minor component of the specific dynamic action (SDA) response.</p>","PeriodicalId":15786,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Biology","volume":"228 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The phenotypic flexibility of the gut is energetically cheap in Burmese pythons: feeding frequency does not affect growth efficiency.\",\"authors\":\"Katja B Last, Maria Skovbjerg Slot, Hans Malte, Emil Rindom, Kasper Hansen, Tobias Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1242/jeb.250083\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The overall energetic expenditure related to the upregulation and downregulation of the mass and function of the gastrointestinal (GI) organs in response to feeding and fasting in vertebrates has attracted great interest. While it is generally considered energetically favourable to downregulate intestinal mass when food is scarce, very few direct experimental studies address the actual costs. Here, we specifically address the costs of phenotypic flexibility by comparing growth, body composition and oxygen consumption of snakes fed on two different feeding regimes. One group was fed intermittently to allow for the gut to be downregulated during the fasting intervals, while the other group was fed more continuously to maintain a chronic upregulated GI tract. We demonstrate that these two feeding regimes result in very similar growth, growth efficiency and overall oxygen consumption, and thus point to upregulation and maintenance of the GI tract being energetically inexpensive. These findings challenge the prevailing assumption that maintaining a functional GI tract is metabolically costly. Although replenishing and maintaining a functional GI tract probably incurs some energetic cost, it probably represents only a minor component of the specific dynamic action (SDA) response.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15786,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Experimental Biology\",\"volume\":\"228 12\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Experimental Biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.250083\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/6/23 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Biology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.250083","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
The phenotypic flexibility of the gut is energetically cheap in Burmese pythons: feeding frequency does not affect growth efficiency.
The overall energetic expenditure related to the upregulation and downregulation of the mass and function of the gastrointestinal (GI) organs in response to feeding and fasting in vertebrates has attracted great interest. While it is generally considered energetically favourable to downregulate intestinal mass when food is scarce, very few direct experimental studies address the actual costs. Here, we specifically address the costs of phenotypic flexibility by comparing growth, body composition and oxygen consumption of snakes fed on two different feeding regimes. One group was fed intermittently to allow for the gut to be downregulated during the fasting intervals, while the other group was fed more continuously to maintain a chronic upregulated GI tract. We demonstrate that these two feeding regimes result in very similar growth, growth efficiency and overall oxygen consumption, and thus point to upregulation and maintenance of the GI tract being energetically inexpensive. These findings challenge the prevailing assumption that maintaining a functional GI tract is metabolically costly. Although replenishing and maintaining a functional GI tract probably incurs some energetic cost, it probably represents only a minor component of the specific dynamic action (SDA) response.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Experimental Biology is the leading primary research journal in comparative physiology and publishes papers on the form and function of living organisms at all levels of biological organisation, from the molecular and subcellular to the integrated whole animal.