衔接观点:南非传统治疗从业者和医生在痴呆症研究和护理方面合作的价值

IF 13 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Eimear McGlinchey, Kirti Ranchod, Rayne Stroebel, Bongiwe Lusizi, Miriam Galvin, Atholl Valdon Kleinhans, Juan Fortea, Jaco Hoffman, Sinethemba Makanya
{"title":"衔接观点:南非传统治疗从业者和医生在痴呆症研究和护理方面合作的价值","authors":"Eimear McGlinchey,&nbsp;Kirti Ranchod,&nbsp;Rayne Stroebel,&nbsp;Bongiwe Lusizi,&nbsp;Miriam Galvin,&nbsp;Atholl Valdon Kleinhans,&nbsp;Juan Fortea,&nbsp;Jaco Hoffman,&nbsp;Sinethemba Makanya","doi":"10.1002/alz.70370","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> INTRODUCTION</h3>\n \n <p>Traditional Healing Practitioners (THPs) provide care to the majority of the population in South Africa. Despite their widespread presence, they remain largely excluded from dementia research and policy. This reinforces healthcare inequities and overlooks the realities of communities where THPs provide care.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> METHODS</h3>\n \n <p>This paper explores the role of THPs in dementia care by examining literature in South Africa. It identifies key barriers to collaboration between THPs and medical doctors and discusses pathways for integration.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> RESULTS</h3>\n \n <p>Barriers include epistemological historical marginalization, mutual distrust, fragmented care pathways, and language barriers. These challenges hinder knowledge exchange and joint dementia care strategies.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> DISCUSSION</h3>\n \n <p>Strengthening relationships through structured engagement, bidirectional knowledge exchange, and ethical collaboration could bridge the gap between THPs and Medical Doctors (MDs). A pluralistic, integrated model valuing both systems could lead to more equitable and effective dementia care.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Highlights</h3>\n \n <div>\n <ul>\n \n <li>The majority of people in South Africa engage with Traditional Healing Practitioners (THPs) as part of their healthcare, yet THPs remain largely excluded from dementia research and policy.</li>\n \n <li>Barriers to collaboration between THPs and Medical Doctors (MDs) include historical marginalization, mutual distrust, fragmented care pathways, and language differences.</li>\n \n <li>Integrating THPs and MDs through structured engagement, bidirectional knowledge exchange, and ethical collaboration could enhance dementia care.</li>\n \n <li>Shifting away from the binary opposition of Indigenous Knowledge Systems (IKS) and biomedical approaches toward a more integrated and collaborative model of dementia care could lead to more equitable and effective healthcare.</li>\n \n <li>The FUNDISA (Framework for Understanding Neurocognitive Disorders via Indigenous Systems in South Africa) project aims to understand how dementia is conceptualized by THPs and foster collaboration between THPs and MDs to support effective dementia care.</li>\n </ul>\n </div>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":7471,"journal":{"name":"Alzheimer's & Dementia","volume":"21 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":13.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/alz.70370","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bridging perspectives: The value of collaboration between Traditional Healing Practitioners and Medical Doctors in dementia research and care in South Africa\",\"authors\":\"Eimear McGlinchey,&nbsp;Kirti Ranchod,&nbsp;Rayne Stroebel,&nbsp;Bongiwe Lusizi,&nbsp;Miriam Galvin,&nbsp;Atholl Valdon Kleinhans,&nbsp;Juan Fortea,&nbsp;Jaco Hoffman,&nbsp;Sinethemba Makanya\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/alz.70370\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> INTRODUCTION</h3>\\n \\n <p>Traditional Healing Practitioners (THPs) provide care to the majority of the population in South Africa. Despite their widespread presence, they remain largely excluded from dementia research and policy. This reinforces healthcare inequities and overlooks the realities of communities where THPs provide care.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> METHODS</h3>\\n \\n <p>This paper explores the role of THPs in dementia care by examining literature in South Africa. It identifies key barriers to collaboration between THPs and medical doctors and discusses pathways for integration.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> RESULTS</h3>\\n \\n <p>Barriers include epistemological historical marginalization, mutual distrust, fragmented care pathways, and language barriers. These challenges hinder knowledge exchange and joint dementia care strategies.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> DISCUSSION</h3>\\n \\n <p>Strengthening relationships through structured engagement, bidirectional knowledge exchange, and ethical collaboration could bridge the gap between THPs and Medical Doctors (MDs). A pluralistic, integrated model valuing both systems could lead to more equitable and effective dementia care.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Highlights</h3>\\n \\n <div>\\n <ul>\\n \\n <li>The majority of people in South Africa engage with Traditional Healing Practitioners (THPs) as part of their healthcare, yet THPs remain largely excluded from dementia research and policy.</li>\\n \\n <li>Barriers to collaboration between THPs and Medical Doctors (MDs) include historical marginalization, mutual distrust, fragmented care pathways, and language differences.</li>\\n \\n <li>Integrating THPs and MDs through structured engagement, bidirectional knowledge exchange, and ethical collaboration could enhance dementia care.</li>\\n \\n <li>Shifting away from the binary opposition of Indigenous Knowledge Systems (IKS) and biomedical approaches toward a more integrated and collaborative model of dementia care could lead to more equitable and effective healthcare.</li>\\n \\n <li>The FUNDISA (Framework for Understanding Neurocognitive Disorders via Indigenous Systems in South Africa) project aims to understand how dementia is conceptualized by THPs and foster collaboration between THPs and MDs to support effective dementia care.</li>\\n </ul>\\n </div>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7471,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Alzheimer's & Dementia\",\"volume\":\"21 6\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":13.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/alz.70370\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Alzheimer's & Dementia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/alz.70370\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alzheimer's & Dementia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/alz.70370","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

传统治疗从业者(THPs)为南非的大多数人口提供护理。尽管它们广泛存在,但它们在很大程度上仍被排除在痴呆症研究和政策之外。这加剧了医疗保健不公平,并忽视了thp提供护理的社区的现实情况。方法:本文通过研究南非的文献,探讨THPs在痴呆护理中的作用。它确定了thp和医生之间合作的主要障碍,并讨论了整合的途径。障碍包括认识论的历史边缘化、相互不信任、支离破碎的护理途径和语言障碍。这些挑战阻碍了知识交流和痴呆联合护理战略。通过结构化参与、双向知识交流和伦理协作来加强关系,可以弥合thp和医学博士之间的差距。一个重视这两个系统的多元化、综合模式可能导致更公平和有效的痴呆症护理。南非的大多数人将传统治疗从业者(thp)作为其医疗保健的一部分,但thp在很大程度上仍被排除在痴呆症研究和政策之外。THPs和md之间合作的障碍包括历史边缘化、相互不信任、支离破碎的护理途径和语言差异。通过结构化参与、双向知识交流和伦理合作,将thp和md整合在一起,可以加强痴呆症护理。从土著知识系统(IKS)和生物医学方法的二元对立转向更综合和协作的痴呆症护理模式,可能会导致更公平和有效的医疗保健。FUNDISA(通过南非土著系统了解神经认知障碍框架)项目旨在了解thp如何将痴呆症概念化,并促进thp和md之间的合作,以支持有效的痴呆症护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Bridging perspectives: The value of collaboration between Traditional Healing Practitioners and Medical Doctors in dementia research and care in South Africa

INTRODUCTION

Traditional Healing Practitioners (THPs) provide care to the majority of the population in South Africa. Despite their widespread presence, they remain largely excluded from dementia research and policy. This reinforces healthcare inequities and overlooks the realities of communities where THPs provide care.

METHODS

This paper explores the role of THPs in dementia care by examining literature in South Africa. It identifies key barriers to collaboration between THPs and medical doctors and discusses pathways for integration.

RESULTS

Barriers include epistemological historical marginalization, mutual distrust, fragmented care pathways, and language barriers. These challenges hinder knowledge exchange and joint dementia care strategies.

DISCUSSION

Strengthening relationships through structured engagement, bidirectional knowledge exchange, and ethical collaboration could bridge the gap between THPs and Medical Doctors (MDs). A pluralistic, integrated model valuing both systems could lead to more equitable and effective dementia care.

Highlights

  • The majority of people in South Africa engage with Traditional Healing Practitioners (THPs) as part of their healthcare, yet THPs remain largely excluded from dementia research and policy.
  • Barriers to collaboration between THPs and Medical Doctors (MDs) include historical marginalization, mutual distrust, fragmented care pathways, and language differences.
  • Integrating THPs and MDs through structured engagement, bidirectional knowledge exchange, and ethical collaboration could enhance dementia care.
  • Shifting away from the binary opposition of Indigenous Knowledge Systems (IKS) and biomedical approaches toward a more integrated and collaborative model of dementia care could lead to more equitable and effective healthcare.
  • The FUNDISA (Framework for Understanding Neurocognitive Disorders via Indigenous Systems in South Africa) project aims to understand how dementia is conceptualized by THPs and foster collaboration between THPs and MDs to support effective dementia care.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Alzheimer's & Dementia
Alzheimer's & Dementia 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
14.50
自引率
5.00%
发文量
299
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Alzheimer's & Dementia is a peer-reviewed journal that aims to bridge knowledge gaps in dementia research by covering the entire spectrum, from basic science to clinical trials to social and behavioral investigations. It provides a platform for rapid communication of new findings and ideas, optimal translation of research into practical applications, increasing knowledge across diverse disciplines for early detection, diagnosis, and intervention, and identifying promising new research directions. In July 2008, Alzheimer's & Dementia was accepted for indexing by MEDLINE, recognizing its scientific merit and contribution to Alzheimer's research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信