能源未来的综合建模和本体:海上运输的脱碳

IF 6.9 2区 经济学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Alex Gould, Anna Finiguerra
{"title":"能源未来的综合建模和本体:海上运输的脱碳","authors":"Alex Gould,&nbsp;Anna Finiguerra","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2025.104195","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Integrated Assessment Models (IAMs) represent an increasingly prominent tool in the governance of energy transitions. While scholars have often pointed to the dissonance between IAMs and the empirical realities they claim to project, studies of how integrated energy modelling interacts with the power relations of energy governance have been relatively scarce. Drawing on literature in Science and Technology Studies, this article explores how IAMs function in the broader relations of power and expertise that govern energy transitions, focusing on the transition to alternative fuels in maritime transport as an illustrative case. More specifically, the article demonstrates that integrated energy modelling anchors and is embedded in broad and complex structures of practices through which ontologies of energy futures are created. It shows that existing literature has adopted too narrow a perspective on the ways integrated energy modelling enacts power relations, concluding that the practices through which models are constructed and reach their audiences should be collapsed together into a single analytical frame.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":"127 ","pages":"Article 104195"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Integrated modelling and ontologies of energy futures: The decarbonisation of maritime transport\",\"authors\":\"Alex Gould,&nbsp;Anna Finiguerra\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.erss.2025.104195\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Integrated Assessment Models (IAMs) represent an increasingly prominent tool in the governance of energy transitions. While scholars have often pointed to the dissonance between IAMs and the empirical realities they claim to project, studies of how integrated energy modelling interacts with the power relations of energy governance have been relatively scarce. Drawing on literature in Science and Technology Studies, this article explores how IAMs function in the broader relations of power and expertise that govern energy transitions, focusing on the transition to alternative fuels in maritime transport as an illustrative case. More specifically, the article demonstrates that integrated energy modelling anchors and is embedded in broad and complex structures of practices through which ontologies of energy futures are created. It shows that existing literature has adopted too narrow a perspective on the ways integrated energy modelling enacts power relations, concluding that the practices through which models are constructed and reach their audiences should be collapsed together into a single analytical frame.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48384,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy Research & Social Science\",\"volume\":\"127 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104195\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy Research & Social Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629625002762\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Research & Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629625002762","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

综合评估模型(iam)是能源转型治理中日益突出的工具。虽然学者们经常指出,综合能源模型与他们声称预测的经验现实之间存在不协调,但关于综合能源模型如何与能源治理的权力关系相互作用的研究相对较少。本文借鉴科学技术研究的文献,探讨了iam如何在管理能源转型的更广泛的权力和专业知识关系中发挥作用,并将重点放在海上运输向替代燃料的过渡作为一个说明性案例。更具体地说,本文表明,综合能源建模锚定并嵌入到广泛而复杂的实践结构中,通过这些实践结构创建能源期货本体。它表明,现有文献对综合能源建模制定权力关系的方式采取了过于狭隘的视角,得出的结论是,构建模型并达到其受众的实践应该被整合到一个单一的分析框架中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Integrated modelling and ontologies of energy futures: The decarbonisation of maritime transport
Integrated Assessment Models (IAMs) represent an increasingly prominent tool in the governance of energy transitions. While scholars have often pointed to the dissonance between IAMs and the empirical realities they claim to project, studies of how integrated energy modelling interacts with the power relations of energy governance have been relatively scarce. Drawing on literature in Science and Technology Studies, this article explores how IAMs function in the broader relations of power and expertise that govern energy transitions, focusing on the transition to alternative fuels in maritime transport as an illustrative case. More specifically, the article demonstrates that integrated energy modelling anchors and is embedded in broad and complex structures of practices through which ontologies of energy futures are created. It shows that existing literature has adopted too narrow a perspective on the ways integrated energy modelling enacts power relations, concluding that the practices through which models are constructed and reach their audiences should be collapsed together into a single analytical frame.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Energy Research & Social Science
Energy Research & Social Science ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
14.00
自引率
16.40%
发文量
441
审稿时长
55 days
期刊介绍: Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) is a peer-reviewed international journal that publishes original research and review articles examining the relationship between energy systems and society. ERSS covers a range of topics revolving around the intersection of energy technologies, fuels, and resources on one side and social processes and influences - including communities of energy users, people affected by energy production, social institutions, customs, traditions, behaviors, and policies - on the other. Put another way, ERSS investigates the social system surrounding energy technology and hardware. ERSS is relevant for energy practitioners, researchers interested in the social aspects of energy production or use, and policymakers. Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) provides an interdisciplinary forum to discuss how social and technical issues related to energy production and consumption interact. Energy production, distribution, and consumption all have both technical and human components, and the latter involves the human causes and consequences of energy-related activities and processes as well as social structures that shape how people interact with energy systems. Energy analysis, therefore, needs to look beyond the dimensions of technology and economics to include these social and human elements.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信