在臂丛和脊髓损伤中,双旋后肌分支转移至骨间后神经可能比单分支具有更好的手开口修复效果。

Pavlos Texakalidis, Nikhil Murthy, Colin K Franz, Kevin Swong
{"title":"在臂丛和脊髓损伤中,双旋后肌分支转移至骨间后神经可能比单分支具有更好的手开口修复效果。","authors":"Pavlos Texakalidis, Nikhil Murthy, Colin K Franz, Kevin Swong","doi":"10.1227/ons.0000000000001670","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Cervical spinal cord injury (SCI) and lower trunk brachial plexus injury (BPI) commonly result in hand paralysis. The supinator to posterior interosseous nerve (SPIN) transfer is a well-established surgical approach that can achieve restoration of hand opening with similar outcomes in SCI and BPI. Most often, the radial nerve has 2 branches to the supinator. Studies have reported utilization of either single or double supinator branches as donors for the SPIN transfer. The aim of this study was to study whether using one or both supinator branches can affect recovery of hand opening.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic literature review was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. All studies reporting outcomes of the SPIN transfer were included.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 16 studies with 108 patients and 152 SPIN transfers were included (132 with double and 20 with single supinator donor branches; 123 for SCI and 29 for BPI). Four of the 16 included studies reported the use of a single motor supinator branch as a donor, while the remaining 12 studies used both branches. The average time interval from injury to surgery was <12 months in each study. Finger extension (Medical Research Council ≥3/5) recovered in 65% (13/20) and 86.3% (114/132) of the single and double donor transfers (P = .016), respectively. Thumb extension restoration was achieved in 60% (12/20) and 83.3% (110/132) of the single and double branch transfers (P = .014), respectively. The median reported follow-up was more than 20 months per study. One patient in the cohort developed supination weakness; however, this patient had preexisting biceps weakness. Four patients developed temporary wrist extension weakness.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Utilization of both supinator branches for the SPIN transfer might achieve superior hand opening outcomes in SCI and BPI, compared with the single supinator branch.</p>","PeriodicalId":520730,"journal":{"name":"Operative neurosurgery (Hagerstown, Md.)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Double Supinator Branch Transfer to Posterior Interosseous Nerve May Confer Superior Hand Opening Restoration Outcomes in Brachial Plexus and Spinal Cord Injury Compared to Single Branch.\",\"authors\":\"Pavlos Texakalidis, Nikhil Murthy, Colin K Franz, Kevin Swong\",\"doi\":\"10.1227/ons.0000000000001670\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Cervical spinal cord injury (SCI) and lower trunk brachial plexus injury (BPI) commonly result in hand paralysis. The supinator to posterior interosseous nerve (SPIN) transfer is a well-established surgical approach that can achieve restoration of hand opening with similar outcomes in SCI and BPI. Most often, the radial nerve has 2 branches to the supinator. Studies have reported utilization of either single or double supinator branches as donors for the SPIN transfer. The aim of this study was to study whether using one or both supinator branches can affect recovery of hand opening.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic literature review was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. All studies reporting outcomes of the SPIN transfer were included.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 16 studies with 108 patients and 152 SPIN transfers were included (132 with double and 20 with single supinator donor branches; 123 for SCI and 29 for BPI). Four of the 16 included studies reported the use of a single motor supinator branch as a donor, while the remaining 12 studies used both branches. The average time interval from injury to surgery was <12 months in each study. Finger extension (Medical Research Council ≥3/5) recovered in 65% (13/20) and 86.3% (114/132) of the single and double donor transfers (P = .016), respectively. Thumb extension restoration was achieved in 60% (12/20) and 83.3% (110/132) of the single and double branch transfers (P = .014), respectively. The median reported follow-up was more than 20 months per study. One patient in the cohort developed supination weakness; however, this patient had preexisting biceps weakness. Four patients developed temporary wrist extension weakness.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Utilization of both supinator branches for the SPIN transfer might achieve superior hand opening outcomes in SCI and BPI, compared with the single supinator branch.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520730,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Operative neurosurgery (Hagerstown, Md.)\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Operative neurosurgery (Hagerstown, Md.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1227/ons.0000000000001670\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Operative neurosurgery (Hagerstown, Md.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1227/ons.0000000000001670","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:颈脊髓损伤(SCI)和下干臂丛损伤(BPI)通常导致手部麻痹。旋后肌到后骨间神经(SPIN)转移是一种成熟的手术入路,可以在SCI和BPI中实现手开口的恢复,其结果相似。大多数情况下,桡神经有两个分支到旋后肌。已有研究报道利用单或双旋后肌分支作为自旋转移的供体。本研究的目的是研究使用一个或两个旋后肌分支是否会影响手张开的恢复。方法:根据系统评价和荟萃分析指南的首选报告项目进行系统文献综述。所有报道自旋转移结果的研究均被纳入。结果:共纳入16项研究,108例患者,152例SPIN转移(132例双旋后旋肌供体分支,20例单旋后旋肌供体分支;SCI为123,BPI为29)。16项纳入的研究中有4项报告使用单个运动旋后肌分支作为供体,而其余12项研究使用两个分支。结论:与单支旋后肌支相比,双支旋后肌支在脊髓损伤和BPI中可获得更好的开手效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Double Supinator Branch Transfer to Posterior Interosseous Nerve May Confer Superior Hand Opening Restoration Outcomes in Brachial Plexus and Spinal Cord Injury Compared to Single Branch.

Background and objectives: Cervical spinal cord injury (SCI) and lower trunk brachial plexus injury (BPI) commonly result in hand paralysis. The supinator to posterior interosseous nerve (SPIN) transfer is a well-established surgical approach that can achieve restoration of hand opening with similar outcomes in SCI and BPI. Most often, the radial nerve has 2 branches to the supinator. Studies have reported utilization of either single or double supinator branches as donors for the SPIN transfer. The aim of this study was to study whether using one or both supinator branches can affect recovery of hand opening.

Methods: A systematic literature review was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. All studies reporting outcomes of the SPIN transfer were included.

Results: A total of 16 studies with 108 patients and 152 SPIN transfers were included (132 with double and 20 with single supinator donor branches; 123 for SCI and 29 for BPI). Four of the 16 included studies reported the use of a single motor supinator branch as a donor, while the remaining 12 studies used both branches. The average time interval from injury to surgery was <12 months in each study. Finger extension (Medical Research Council ≥3/5) recovered in 65% (13/20) and 86.3% (114/132) of the single and double donor transfers (P = .016), respectively. Thumb extension restoration was achieved in 60% (12/20) and 83.3% (110/132) of the single and double branch transfers (P = .014), respectively. The median reported follow-up was more than 20 months per study. One patient in the cohort developed supination weakness; however, this patient had preexisting biceps weakness. Four patients developed temporary wrist extension weakness.

Conclusion: Utilization of both supinator branches for the SPIN transfer might achieve superior hand opening outcomes in SCI and BPI, compared with the single supinator branch.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信