{"title":"急诊医生计算机断层扫描诊断错误导致急诊科临床管理改变的预测因素","authors":"Naoaki Shibata, Takafumi Yonemitsu, Nozomu Shima, Yuichi Miyake, Tomoya Fukui, Junya Fuchigami, Akira Ikoma, Tetsuo Sonomura, Shigeaki Inoue","doi":"10.1007/s10140-025-02357-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The use of computed tomography (CT) in the emergency department (ED) has been increasing due to its diagnostic value for emergency physicians (EPs). This study aimed to determine the predictors of EP interpretation errors (IEs) on CT scans leading to change in clinical management (IECM) in both endogenous and exogenous ED visits.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-center, retrospective cohort study included patients with consecutive ED visits initially managed by EPs at our institution over 6 months. Patients who did not undergo CT imaging and presented with cardiopulmonary arrest upon arrival were excluded. CT images were interpreted by emergency radiologists immediately after acquisition, and IEs were identified. The primary outcome was IECM, determined by reference to the clinical management decisions made by EPs. A multivariate analysis was performed to determine the independent predictors of IECM.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 2,037 patients, 158 (8%) had IEs, whereas 52 (3%) had IECM. Multisite CT imaging was the strongest independent predictor for both IECM (OR: 2.25, 95% CI: 1.21-4.19, P = 0.011) and IEs (OR: 2.32, 95% CI: 1.61-3.36, P < 0.001). Other predictors of IECM were prolonged ED stay and night-time ED visits as clinical factors. Additional predictors of overall IEs were contrast-enhanced CT and abdominopelvic CT as radiological factors.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Multisite CT imaging, which involve multiple organs and extensive diagnostic information, significantly increases the likelihood of misinterpretation, leading to change in clinical management by EPs.</p>","PeriodicalId":11623,"journal":{"name":"Emergency Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predictors of diagnostic errors in computed tomography interpretation by emergency physicians leading to changes in clinical management in the emergency department.\",\"authors\":\"Naoaki Shibata, Takafumi Yonemitsu, Nozomu Shima, Yuichi Miyake, Tomoya Fukui, Junya Fuchigami, Akira Ikoma, Tetsuo Sonomura, Shigeaki Inoue\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10140-025-02357-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The use of computed tomography (CT) in the emergency department (ED) has been increasing due to its diagnostic value for emergency physicians (EPs). This study aimed to determine the predictors of EP interpretation errors (IEs) on CT scans leading to change in clinical management (IECM) in both endogenous and exogenous ED visits.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-center, retrospective cohort study included patients with consecutive ED visits initially managed by EPs at our institution over 6 months. Patients who did not undergo CT imaging and presented with cardiopulmonary arrest upon arrival were excluded. CT images were interpreted by emergency radiologists immediately after acquisition, and IEs were identified. The primary outcome was IECM, determined by reference to the clinical management decisions made by EPs. A multivariate analysis was performed to determine the independent predictors of IECM.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 2,037 patients, 158 (8%) had IEs, whereas 52 (3%) had IECM. Multisite CT imaging was the strongest independent predictor for both IECM (OR: 2.25, 95% CI: 1.21-4.19, P = 0.011) and IEs (OR: 2.32, 95% CI: 1.61-3.36, P < 0.001). Other predictors of IECM were prolonged ED stay and night-time ED visits as clinical factors. Additional predictors of overall IEs were contrast-enhanced CT and abdominopelvic CT as radiological factors.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Multisite CT imaging, which involve multiple organs and extensive diagnostic information, significantly increases the likelihood of misinterpretation, leading to change in clinical management by EPs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11623,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Emergency Radiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Emergency Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10140-025-02357-y\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emergency Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10140-025-02357-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
Predictors of diagnostic errors in computed tomography interpretation by emergency physicians leading to changes in clinical management in the emergency department.
Purpose: The use of computed tomography (CT) in the emergency department (ED) has been increasing due to its diagnostic value for emergency physicians (EPs). This study aimed to determine the predictors of EP interpretation errors (IEs) on CT scans leading to change in clinical management (IECM) in both endogenous and exogenous ED visits.
Methods: This single-center, retrospective cohort study included patients with consecutive ED visits initially managed by EPs at our institution over 6 months. Patients who did not undergo CT imaging and presented with cardiopulmonary arrest upon arrival were excluded. CT images were interpreted by emergency radiologists immediately after acquisition, and IEs were identified. The primary outcome was IECM, determined by reference to the clinical management decisions made by EPs. A multivariate analysis was performed to determine the independent predictors of IECM.
Results: Among the 2,037 patients, 158 (8%) had IEs, whereas 52 (3%) had IECM. Multisite CT imaging was the strongest independent predictor for both IECM (OR: 2.25, 95% CI: 1.21-4.19, P = 0.011) and IEs (OR: 2.32, 95% CI: 1.61-3.36, P < 0.001). Other predictors of IECM were prolonged ED stay and night-time ED visits as clinical factors. Additional predictors of overall IEs were contrast-enhanced CT and abdominopelvic CT as radiological factors.
Conclusion: Multisite CT imaging, which involve multiple organs and extensive diagnostic information, significantly increases the likelihood of misinterpretation, leading to change in clinical management by EPs.
期刊介绍:
To advance and improve the radiologic aspects of emergency careTo establish Emergency Radiology as an area of special interest in the field of diagnostic imagingTo improve methods of education in Emergency RadiologyTo provide, through formal meetings, a mechanism for presentation of scientific papers on various aspects of Emergency Radiology and continuing educationTo promote research in Emergency Radiology by clinical and basic science investigators, including residents and other traineesTo act as the resource body on Emergency Radiology for those interested in emergency patient care Members of the American Society of Emergency Radiology (ASER) receive the Emergency Radiology journal as a benefit of membership!