{"title":"莫匹罗星鼻冲洗与生理盐水鼻冲洗治疗急性鼻窦炎的疗效:一项随机双盲研究。","authors":"Bharat Bhushan, D Jayapriya, Atul Mukul Bage","doi":"10.1007/s12070-025-05527-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Acute rhinosinusitis is a common inflammatory condition characterized by the inflammation of the paranasal sinuses. The use of saline irrigation in the nasal passages is a well-established and effective approach for managing both acute and chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS), allergic or nonallergic, atrophic rhinitis, facilitating postoperative care following endoscopic sinus surgery as well [4]. Various topical agents can be added to lavage solution. Among this mupirocin has notable anti-staphylococcal properties. To study and compare the efficacy of mupirocin nasal irrigation with saline nasal irrigation in reducing symptoms and duration of treatment in the case of acute rhinosinusitis. In AVMC Pondicherry a randomized double blinded trial was carried out. A total of 50 patients diagnosed with acute rhinosinusitis are selected and equally divided into two groups. One group was given mupirocin nasal irrigation solution, other group was given saline nasal irrigation solution. Patient's symptoms were evaluated at Different visits and mean symptomatic score (MSS) was used to gather data. The mean age of participants in both Group A and Group B is approximately 41.3 (<i>±</i> 11.632) years and 39.8(<i>+ 10.163)</i> years. The percentage distribution of male and female subjects is 44.0% and 56.0% in group A and in group B 36.0% and 64.0% in this present study. There was no statistical variation found in mean major symptom score between group A and group B for day 0 (0.090), but there was a statistical variation found in mean major symptom score between group A and group B for day 5 (0.04*) and day 10 (0.02*). There was no statistical variation found in duration of antibiotics course between group A and group B was 0.05*. Both mupirocin nasal irrigation and saline nasal irrigation are effective in reducing symptoms of acute rhinosinusitis. However, mupirocin nasal irrigation appears to lead to more rapid improvement in symptom severity and but may not help reduce the duration of antibiotic therapy compared to saline nasal irrigation.</p>","PeriodicalId":49190,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery","volume":"77 7","pages":"2480-2486"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12149080/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of Mupirocin Nasal Irrigation Versus Saline Nasal Irrigation in Acute Rhinosinusitis: A Randomized Double-Blind Study.\",\"authors\":\"Bharat Bhushan, D Jayapriya, Atul Mukul Bage\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12070-025-05527-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Acute rhinosinusitis is a common inflammatory condition characterized by the inflammation of the paranasal sinuses. The use of saline irrigation in the nasal passages is a well-established and effective approach for managing both acute and chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS), allergic or nonallergic, atrophic rhinitis, facilitating postoperative care following endoscopic sinus surgery as well [4]. Various topical agents can be added to lavage solution. Among this mupirocin has notable anti-staphylococcal properties. To study and compare the efficacy of mupirocin nasal irrigation with saline nasal irrigation in reducing symptoms and duration of treatment in the case of acute rhinosinusitis. In AVMC Pondicherry a randomized double blinded trial was carried out. A total of 50 patients diagnosed with acute rhinosinusitis are selected and equally divided into two groups. One group was given mupirocin nasal irrigation solution, other group was given saline nasal irrigation solution. Patient's symptoms were evaluated at Different visits and mean symptomatic score (MSS) was used to gather data. The mean age of participants in both Group A and Group B is approximately 41.3 (<i>±</i> 11.632) years and 39.8(<i>+ 10.163)</i> years. The percentage distribution of male and female subjects is 44.0% and 56.0% in group A and in group B 36.0% and 64.0% in this present study. There was no statistical variation found in mean major symptom score between group A and group B for day 0 (0.090), but there was a statistical variation found in mean major symptom score between group A and group B for day 5 (0.04*) and day 10 (0.02*). There was no statistical variation found in duration of antibiotics course between group A and group B was 0.05*. Both mupirocin nasal irrigation and saline nasal irrigation are effective in reducing symptoms of acute rhinosinusitis. However, mupirocin nasal irrigation appears to lead to more rapid improvement in symptom severity and but may not help reduce the duration of antibiotic therapy compared to saline nasal irrigation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49190,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery\",\"volume\":\"77 7\",\"pages\":\"2480-2486\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12149080/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-025-05527-z\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/5/20 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-025-05527-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Efficacy of Mupirocin Nasal Irrigation Versus Saline Nasal Irrigation in Acute Rhinosinusitis: A Randomized Double-Blind Study.
Acute rhinosinusitis is a common inflammatory condition characterized by the inflammation of the paranasal sinuses. The use of saline irrigation in the nasal passages is a well-established and effective approach for managing both acute and chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS), allergic or nonallergic, atrophic rhinitis, facilitating postoperative care following endoscopic sinus surgery as well [4]. Various topical agents can be added to lavage solution. Among this mupirocin has notable anti-staphylococcal properties. To study and compare the efficacy of mupirocin nasal irrigation with saline nasal irrigation in reducing symptoms and duration of treatment in the case of acute rhinosinusitis. In AVMC Pondicherry a randomized double blinded trial was carried out. A total of 50 patients diagnosed with acute rhinosinusitis are selected and equally divided into two groups. One group was given mupirocin nasal irrigation solution, other group was given saline nasal irrigation solution. Patient's symptoms were evaluated at Different visits and mean symptomatic score (MSS) was used to gather data. The mean age of participants in both Group A and Group B is approximately 41.3 (± 11.632) years and 39.8(+ 10.163) years. The percentage distribution of male and female subjects is 44.0% and 56.0% in group A and in group B 36.0% and 64.0% in this present study. There was no statistical variation found in mean major symptom score between group A and group B for day 0 (0.090), but there was a statistical variation found in mean major symptom score between group A and group B for day 5 (0.04*) and day 10 (0.02*). There was no statistical variation found in duration of antibiotics course between group A and group B was 0.05*. Both mupirocin nasal irrigation and saline nasal irrigation are effective in reducing symptoms of acute rhinosinusitis. However, mupirocin nasal irrigation appears to lead to more rapid improvement in symptom severity and but may not help reduce the duration of antibiotic therapy compared to saline nasal irrigation.
期刊介绍:
Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery was founded as Indian Journal of Otolaryngology in 1949 as a scientific Journal published by the Association of Otolaryngologists of India and was later rechristened as IJOHNS to incorporate the changes and progress.
IJOHNS, undoubtedly one of the oldest Journals in India, is the official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India and is about to publish it is 67th Volume in 2015. The Journal published quarterly accepts articles in general Oto-Rhino-Laryngology and various subspecialities such as Otology, Rhinology, Laryngology and Phonosurgery, Neurotology, Head and Neck Surgery etc.
The Journal acts as a window to showcase and project the clinical and research work done by Otolaryngologists community in India and around the world. It is a continued source of useful clinical information with peer review by eminent Otolaryngologists of repute in their respective fields. The Journal accepts articles pertaining to clinical reports, Clinical studies, Research articles in basic and applied Otolaryngology, short Communications, Clinical records reporting unusual presentations or lesions and new surgical techniques. The journal acts as a catalyst and mirrors the Indian Otolaryngologist’s active interests and pursuits. The Journal also invites articles from senior and experienced authors on interesting topics in Otolaryngology and allied sciences from all over the world.
The print version is distributed free to about 4000 members of Association of Otolaryngologists of India and the e-Journal shortly going to make its appearance on the Springer Board can be accessed by all the members.
Association of Otolaryngologists of India and M/s Springer India group have come together to co-publish IJOHNS from January 2007 and this bondage is going to provide an impetus to the Journal in terms of international presence and global exposure.