莫匹罗星鼻冲洗与生理盐水鼻冲洗治疗急性鼻窦炎的疗效:一项随机双盲研究。

IF 0.6 Q4 SURGERY
Bharat Bhushan, D Jayapriya, Atul Mukul Bage
{"title":"莫匹罗星鼻冲洗与生理盐水鼻冲洗治疗急性鼻窦炎的疗效:一项随机双盲研究。","authors":"Bharat Bhushan, D Jayapriya, Atul Mukul Bage","doi":"10.1007/s12070-025-05527-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Acute rhinosinusitis is a common inflammatory condition characterized by the inflammation of the paranasal sinuses. The use of saline irrigation in the nasal passages is a well-established and effective approach for managing both acute and chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS), allergic or nonallergic, atrophic rhinitis, facilitating postoperative care following endoscopic sinus surgery as well [4]. Various topical agents can be added to lavage solution. Among this mupirocin has notable anti-staphylococcal properties. To study and compare the efficacy of mupirocin nasal irrigation with saline nasal irrigation in reducing symptoms and duration of treatment in the case of acute rhinosinusitis. In AVMC Pondicherry a randomized double blinded trial was carried out. A total of 50 patients diagnosed with acute rhinosinusitis are selected and equally divided into two groups. One group was given mupirocin nasal irrigation solution, other group was given saline nasal irrigation solution. Patient's symptoms were evaluated at Different visits and mean symptomatic score (MSS) was used to gather data. The mean age of participants in both Group A and Group B is approximately 41.3 (<i>±</i> 11.632) years and 39.8(<i>+ 10.163)</i> years. The percentage distribution of male and female subjects is 44.0% and 56.0% in group A and in group B 36.0% and 64.0% in this present study. There was no statistical variation found in mean major symptom score between group A and group B for day 0 (0.090), but there was a statistical variation found in mean major symptom score between group A and group B for day 5 (0.04*) and day 10 (0.02*). There was no statistical variation found in duration of antibiotics course between group A and group B was 0.05*. Both mupirocin nasal irrigation and saline nasal irrigation are effective in reducing symptoms of acute rhinosinusitis. However, mupirocin nasal irrigation appears to lead to more rapid improvement in symptom severity and but may not help reduce the duration of antibiotic therapy compared to saline nasal irrigation.</p>","PeriodicalId":49190,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery","volume":"77 7","pages":"2480-2486"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12149080/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of Mupirocin Nasal Irrigation Versus Saline Nasal Irrigation in Acute Rhinosinusitis: A Randomized Double-Blind Study.\",\"authors\":\"Bharat Bhushan, D Jayapriya, Atul Mukul Bage\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12070-025-05527-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Acute rhinosinusitis is a common inflammatory condition characterized by the inflammation of the paranasal sinuses. The use of saline irrigation in the nasal passages is a well-established and effective approach for managing both acute and chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS), allergic or nonallergic, atrophic rhinitis, facilitating postoperative care following endoscopic sinus surgery as well [4]. Various topical agents can be added to lavage solution. Among this mupirocin has notable anti-staphylococcal properties. To study and compare the efficacy of mupirocin nasal irrigation with saline nasal irrigation in reducing symptoms and duration of treatment in the case of acute rhinosinusitis. In AVMC Pondicherry a randomized double blinded trial was carried out. A total of 50 patients diagnosed with acute rhinosinusitis are selected and equally divided into two groups. One group was given mupirocin nasal irrigation solution, other group was given saline nasal irrigation solution. Patient's symptoms were evaluated at Different visits and mean symptomatic score (MSS) was used to gather data. The mean age of participants in both Group A and Group B is approximately 41.3 (<i>±</i> 11.632) years and 39.8(<i>+ 10.163)</i> years. The percentage distribution of male and female subjects is 44.0% and 56.0% in group A and in group B 36.0% and 64.0% in this present study. There was no statistical variation found in mean major symptom score between group A and group B for day 0 (0.090), but there was a statistical variation found in mean major symptom score between group A and group B for day 5 (0.04*) and day 10 (0.02*). There was no statistical variation found in duration of antibiotics course between group A and group B was 0.05*. Both mupirocin nasal irrigation and saline nasal irrigation are effective in reducing symptoms of acute rhinosinusitis. However, mupirocin nasal irrigation appears to lead to more rapid improvement in symptom severity and but may not help reduce the duration of antibiotic therapy compared to saline nasal irrigation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49190,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery\",\"volume\":\"77 7\",\"pages\":\"2480-2486\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12149080/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-025-05527-z\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/5/20 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-025-05527-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

急性鼻窦炎是一种常见的以鼻窦炎症为特征的炎症。鼻道盐水冲洗是治疗急性和慢性鼻窦炎(CRS)、过敏性或非过敏性鼻炎、萎缩性鼻炎的一种行之有效的方法,有助于鼻窦内窥镜手术和[4]后的术后护理。洗洗液中可加入各种外用药剂。其中,莫匹罗星具有显著的抗葡萄球菌特性。研究并比较莫匹罗星鼻冲洗与生理盐水鼻冲洗在减轻急性鼻窦炎症状和治疗时间上的疗效。在AVMC本地治里进行了一项随机双盲试验。共选择50例诊断为急性鼻窦炎的患者,平均分为两组。一组给予莫匹罗星鼻冲洗液,另一组给予生理盐水鼻冲洗液。在不同的就诊中评估患者的症状,并使用平均症状评分(MSS)收集数据。A组和B组参与者的平均年龄分别为41.3(±11.632)岁和39.8(+ 10.163)岁。本研究A组和B组的男女比例分布分别为44.0%和56.0%,B组分别为36.0%和64.0%。A组和B组患者第0天的主要症状平均评分差异无统计学意义(0.090),第5天和第10天的主要症状平均评分差异有统计学意义(0.04*)和0.02*)。A组与B组抗生素疗程差异无统计学意义,均为0.05*。莫匹罗星鼻冲洗和生理盐水鼻冲洗都能有效减轻急性鼻窦炎的症状。然而,与生理盐水洗鼻相比,莫匹罗星鼻冲洗似乎能更快地改善症状严重程度,但可能无助于缩短抗生素治疗的持续时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Efficacy of Mupirocin Nasal Irrigation Versus Saline Nasal Irrigation in Acute Rhinosinusitis: A Randomized Double-Blind Study.

Acute rhinosinusitis is a common inflammatory condition characterized by the inflammation of the paranasal sinuses. The use of saline irrigation in the nasal passages is a well-established and effective approach for managing both acute and chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS), allergic or nonallergic, atrophic rhinitis, facilitating postoperative care following endoscopic sinus surgery as well [4]. Various topical agents can be added to lavage solution. Among this mupirocin has notable anti-staphylococcal properties. To study and compare the efficacy of mupirocin nasal irrigation with saline nasal irrigation in reducing symptoms and duration of treatment in the case of acute rhinosinusitis. In AVMC Pondicherry a randomized double blinded trial was carried out. A total of 50 patients diagnosed with acute rhinosinusitis are selected and equally divided into two groups. One group was given mupirocin nasal irrigation solution, other group was given saline nasal irrigation solution. Patient's symptoms were evaluated at Different visits and mean symptomatic score (MSS) was used to gather data. The mean age of participants in both Group A and Group B is approximately 41.3 (± 11.632) years and 39.8(+ 10.163) years. The percentage distribution of male and female subjects is 44.0% and 56.0% in group A and in group B 36.0% and 64.0% in this present study. There was no statistical variation found in mean major symptom score between group A and group B for day 0 (0.090), but there was a statistical variation found in mean major symptom score between group A and group B for day 5 (0.04*) and day 10 (0.02*). There was no statistical variation found in duration of antibiotics course between group A and group B was 0.05*. Both mupirocin nasal irrigation and saline nasal irrigation are effective in reducing symptoms of acute rhinosinusitis. However, mupirocin nasal irrigation appears to lead to more rapid improvement in symptom severity and but may not help reduce the duration of antibiotic therapy compared to saline nasal irrigation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
226
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery was founded as Indian Journal of Otolaryngology in 1949 as a scientific Journal published by the Association of Otolaryngologists of India and was later rechristened as IJOHNS to incorporate the changes and progress. IJOHNS, undoubtedly one of the oldest Journals in India, is the official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India and is about to publish it is 67th Volume in 2015. The Journal published quarterly accepts articles in general Oto-Rhino-Laryngology and various subspecialities such as Otology, Rhinology, Laryngology and Phonosurgery, Neurotology, Head and Neck Surgery etc. The Journal acts as a window to showcase and project the clinical and research work done by Otolaryngologists community in India and around the world. It is a continued source of useful clinical information with peer review by eminent Otolaryngologists of repute in their respective fields. The Journal accepts articles pertaining to clinical reports, Clinical studies, Research articles in basic and applied Otolaryngology, short Communications, Clinical records reporting unusual presentations or lesions and new surgical techniques. The journal acts as a catalyst and mirrors the Indian Otolaryngologist’s active interests and pursuits. The Journal also invites articles from senior and experienced authors on interesting topics in Otolaryngology and allied sciences from all over the world. The print version is distributed free to about 4000 members of Association of Otolaryngologists of India and the e-Journal shortly going to make its appearance on the Springer Board can be accessed by all the members. Association of Otolaryngologists of India and M/s Springer India group have come together to co-publish IJOHNS from January 2007 and this bondage is going to provide an impetus to the Journal in terms of international presence and global exposure.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信