心理治疗的有效性:综合世界各地区和12个心理健康问题的“元分析研究领域”。

IF 19.8 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY
Mathias Harrer, Clara Miguel, Wouter van Ballegooijen, Marketa Ciharova, Constantin Yves Plessen, Paula Kuper, Antonia A Sprenger, Claudia Buntrock, Davide Papola, Ioana A Cristea, Nino de Ponti, Đorđe Bašić, Darin Pauley, Ellen Driessen, Soledad Quero, Jorge Grimaldos, Sara Fernández Buendía, Cristina Botella, Jessica L Hamblen, Paula P Schnurr, Sadie E Larsen, Rory A Pfund, Emma Motrico, Irene Gómez-Gómez, Kim Setkowski, Minoo Matbouriahi, Yingying Wang, Josine Rawee, Heleen Riper, Annemieke van Straten, Marit Sijbrandij, Stefan Leucht, Toshi A Furukawa, Eirini Karyotaki, Pim Cuijpers
{"title":"心理治疗的有效性:综合世界各地区和12个心理健康问题的“元分析研究领域”。","authors":"Mathias Harrer, Clara Miguel, Wouter van Ballegooijen, Marketa Ciharova, Constantin Yves Plessen, Paula Kuper, Antonia A Sprenger, Claudia Buntrock, Davide Papola, Ioana A Cristea, Nino de Ponti, Đorđe Bašić, Darin Pauley, Ellen Driessen, Soledad Quero, Jorge Grimaldos, Sara Fernández Buendía, Cristina Botella, Jessica L Hamblen, Paula P Schnurr, Sadie E Larsen, Rory A Pfund, Emma Motrico, Irene Gómez-Gómez, Kim Setkowski, Minoo Matbouriahi, Yingying Wang, Josine Rawee, Heleen Riper, Annemieke van Straten, Marit Sijbrandij, Stefan Leucht, Toshi A Furukawa, Eirini Karyotaki, Pim Cuijpers","doi":"10.1037/bul0000465","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The scientific output generated in psychology has surged in recent decades, including the number of studies investigating psychological treatments. To keep track of all this evidence, we developed the \"Metapsy\" meta-analytic research domain: a comprehensive system of open databases and tailored software that allows for rapid evidence generation. We leverage this novel infrastructure to summarize the effect of psychological treatment across 12 mental health problems and trace back the global expansion of psychotherapy research over the past 50 years. Including 1,029 studies with 85,952 patients, our results indicate small to moderate average benefits in treating psychosis (g = 0.32), suicidal ideation (g = 0.34), borderline personality disorder (g = 0.46), and prolonged grief (g = 0.49). In contrast, psychological interventions have large average effects on depression (g = 0.73), problem gambling (g = 0.80), panic (g = 0.83), generalized anxiety (g = 0.86), social anxiety (g = 0.95), obsessive-compulsive (g = 1.18), posttraumatic stress disorder (g = 1.18), and phobias (g = 1.25). Most available evidence (83.4%-86.1%) comes from high-income and Western countries, but their dominance is declining. We found no indication that psychotherapy is less effective in low- and middle-income countries (g = 0.38-2.41) or non-Western cultures (g = 0.74-2.20). We discuss ways to further enhance psychotherapy's public health impact, as well as how the meta-analytic research domain concept may be extended to other types of psychological research in the future. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20854,"journal":{"name":"Psychological bulletin","volume":"151 5","pages":"600-667"},"PeriodicalIF":19.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness of psychotherapy: Synthesis of a \\\"meta-analytic research domain\\\" across world regions and 12 mental health problems.\",\"authors\":\"Mathias Harrer, Clara Miguel, Wouter van Ballegooijen, Marketa Ciharova, Constantin Yves Plessen, Paula Kuper, Antonia A Sprenger, Claudia Buntrock, Davide Papola, Ioana A Cristea, Nino de Ponti, Đorđe Bašić, Darin Pauley, Ellen Driessen, Soledad Quero, Jorge Grimaldos, Sara Fernández Buendía, Cristina Botella, Jessica L Hamblen, Paula P Schnurr, Sadie E Larsen, Rory A Pfund, Emma Motrico, Irene Gómez-Gómez, Kim Setkowski, Minoo Matbouriahi, Yingying Wang, Josine Rawee, Heleen Riper, Annemieke van Straten, Marit Sijbrandij, Stefan Leucht, Toshi A Furukawa, Eirini Karyotaki, Pim Cuijpers\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/bul0000465\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The scientific output generated in psychology has surged in recent decades, including the number of studies investigating psychological treatments. To keep track of all this evidence, we developed the \\\"Metapsy\\\" meta-analytic research domain: a comprehensive system of open databases and tailored software that allows for rapid evidence generation. We leverage this novel infrastructure to summarize the effect of psychological treatment across 12 mental health problems and trace back the global expansion of psychotherapy research over the past 50 years. Including 1,029 studies with 85,952 patients, our results indicate small to moderate average benefits in treating psychosis (g = 0.32), suicidal ideation (g = 0.34), borderline personality disorder (g = 0.46), and prolonged grief (g = 0.49). In contrast, psychological interventions have large average effects on depression (g = 0.73), problem gambling (g = 0.80), panic (g = 0.83), generalized anxiety (g = 0.86), social anxiety (g = 0.95), obsessive-compulsive (g = 1.18), posttraumatic stress disorder (g = 1.18), and phobias (g = 1.25). Most available evidence (83.4%-86.1%) comes from high-income and Western countries, but their dominance is declining. We found no indication that psychotherapy is less effective in low- and middle-income countries (g = 0.38-2.41) or non-Western cultures (g = 0.74-2.20). We discuss ways to further enhance psychotherapy's public health impact, as well as how the meta-analytic research domain concept may be extended to other types of psychological research in the future. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20854,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychological bulletin\",\"volume\":\"151 5\",\"pages\":\"600-667\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":19.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychological bulletin\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000465\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000465","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

近几十年来,心理学领域产生的科学成果激增,包括调查心理治疗的研究数量。为了跟踪所有这些证据,我们开发了“Metapsy”元分析研究领域:一个由开放数据库和定制软件组成的综合系统,可以快速生成证据。我们利用这一新的基础架构来总结12种心理健康问题的心理治疗效果,并追溯过去50年来心理治疗研究的全球扩张。包括1029项研究,85,952例患者,我们的结果表明,在治疗精神病(g = 0.32)、自杀意念(g = 0.34)、边缘型人格障碍(g = 0.46)和长期悲伤(g = 0.49)方面,平均获益小到中等。相比之下,心理干预对抑郁(g = 0.73)、问题赌博(g = 0.80)、恐慌(g = 0.83)、广泛性焦虑(g = 0.86)、社交焦虑(g = 0.95)、强迫症(g = 1.18)、创伤后应激障碍(g = 1.18)和恐惧症(g = 1.25)的平均影响较大。大多数现有证据(83.4%-86.1%)来自高收入国家和西方国家,但它们的主导地位正在下降。我们没有发现心理治疗在低收入和中等收入国家(g = 0.38-2.41)或非西方文化(g = 0.74-2.20)效果较差的迹象。我们讨论了进一步增强心理治疗对公共卫生影响的方法,以及未来如何将元分析研究领域的概念扩展到其他类型的心理学研究。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effectiveness of psychotherapy: Synthesis of a "meta-analytic research domain" across world regions and 12 mental health problems.

The scientific output generated in psychology has surged in recent decades, including the number of studies investigating psychological treatments. To keep track of all this evidence, we developed the "Metapsy" meta-analytic research domain: a comprehensive system of open databases and tailored software that allows for rapid evidence generation. We leverage this novel infrastructure to summarize the effect of psychological treatment across 12 mental health problems and trace back the global expansion of psychotherapy research over the past 50 years. Including 1,029 studies with 85,952 patients, our results indicate small to moderate average benefits in treating psychosis (g = 0.32), suicidal ideation (g = 0.34), borderline personality disorder (g = 0.46), and prolonged grief (g = 0.49). In contrast, psychological interventions have large average effects on depression (g = 0.73), problem gambling (g = 0.80), panic (g = 0.83), generalized anxiety (g = 0.86), social anxiety (g = 0.95), obsessive-compulsive (g = 1.18), posttraumatic stress disorder (g = 1.18), and phobias (g = 1.25). Most available evidence (83.4%-86.1%) comes from high-income and Western countries, but their dominance is declining. We found no indication that psychotherapy is less effective in low- and middle-income countries (g = 0.38-2.41) or non-Western cultures (g = 0.74-2.20). We discuss ways to further enhance psychotherapy's public health impact, as well as how the meta-analytic research domain concept may be extended to other types of psychological research in the future. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Psychological bulletin
Psychological bulletin 医学-心理学
CiteScore
33.60
自引率
0.90%
发文量
21
期刊介绍: Psychological Bulletin publishes syntheses of research in scientific psychology. Research syntheses seek to summarize past research by drawing overall conclusions from many separate investigations that address related or identical hypotheses. A research synthesis typically presents the authors' assessments: -of the state of knowledge concerning the relations of interest; -of critical assessments of the strengths and weaknesses in past research; -of important issues that research has left unresolved, thereby directing future research so it can yield a maximum amount of new information.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信