Francisco Vega , Aart J. van der Molen , Maria Ruiz-Calatayud , Aitana Alberdi , Maria Catalá , Carlos Blanco-Mota , Annick A.J.M van de Ven , José J. Laguna , Carmen Sebastia
{"title":"造影剂使用后超敏反应的过敏学评价:放射科医生需要知道的","authors":"Francisco Vega , Aart J. van der Molen , Maria Ruiz-Calatayud , Aitana Alberdi , Maria Catalá , Carlos Blanco-Mota , Annick A.J.M van de Ven , José J. Laguna , Carmen Sebastia","doi":"10.1016/j.ejrad.2025.112194","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To familiarize radiologists with the methodology used in the assessment and management of hypersensitivity reactions to contrast agents.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This review provides diagnostic tools for the appropriate identification this type of reactions, including a checklist of key clinical items and a proposed algorithm to differentiate hypersensitivity reactions from nonspecific reactions and to assess their severity. It also outlines the main <em>in vitro</em> techniques (specific IgE, basophil activation test, mast cell activation test, lymphoblastic transformation test, and ELISpot) and <em>in vivo</em> procedures (skin tests and drug provocation tests) used to identify the culprit contrast agent and guide the selection of a safe alternative.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Although premedication is commonly used, its effectiveness is limited. Administering an alternative contras agent is a more effective strategy, but empirical selection carries a risk of recurrence. Allergy testing enables safer selection of an alternative agent. Integrating allergy evaluation into radiological practice can improve patient safety and outcomes in patients with a history of previous reactions.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Allergological techniques are valuable tools that support radiologists in the safe management of patients with hypersensitivity reaction to contrast agent, particularly in cases requiring re-exposure. The article concludes by presenting a diagnostic algorithm for both immediate and delayed reactions.</div></div><div><h3>Clinical relevance statement</h3><div>Switching to an alternative contrast agent is the most effective way to prevent a new hypersensitivity reaction. Radiologists should be familiar with the <em>in vivo</em> and in vitro techniques used in the allergy work-up to select a safe alternative agent.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12063,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Radiology","volume":"190 ","pages":"Article 112194"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Allergological evaluation of hypersensitivity reactions after administration of contrast agents: What the radiologist needs to know\",\"authors\":\"Francisco Vega , Aart J. van der Molen , Maria Ruiz-Calatayud , Aitana Alberdi , Maria Catalá , Carlos Blanco-Mota , Annick A.J.M van de Ven , José J. Laguna , Carmen Sebastia\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ejrad.2025.112194\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To familiarize radiologists with the methodology used in the assessment and management of hypersensitivity reactions to contrast agents.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This review provides diagnostic tools for the appropriate identification this type of reactions, including a checklist of key clinical items and a proposed algorithm to differentiate hypersensitivity reactions from nonspecific reactions and to assess their severity. It also outlines the main <em>in vitro</em> techniques (specific IgE, basophil activation test, mast cell activation test, lymphoblastic transformation test, and ELISpot) and <em>in vivo</em> procedures (skin tests and drug provocation tests) used to identify the culprit contrast agent and guide the selection of a safe alternative.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Although premedication is commonly used, its effectiveness is limited. Administering an alternative contras agent is a more effective strategy, but empirical selection carries a risk of recurrence. Allergy testing enables safer selection of an alternative agent. Integrating allergy evaluation into radiological practice can improve patient safety and outcomes in patients with a history of previous reactions.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Allergological techniques are valuable tools that support radiologists in the safe management of patients with hypersensitivity reaction to contrast agent, particularly in cases requiring re-exposure. The article concludes by presenting a diagnostic algorithm for both immediate and delayed reactions.</div></div><div><h3>Clinical relevance statement</h3><div>Switching to an alternative contrast agent is the most effective way to prevent a new hypersensitivity reaction. Radiologists should be familiar with the <em>in vivo</em> and in vitro techniques used in the allergy work-up to select a safe alternative agent.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12063,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Radiology\",\"volume\":\"190 \",\"pages\":\"Article 112194\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0720048X25002803\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0720048X25002803","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
Allergological evaluation of hypersensitivity reactions after administration of contrast agents: What the radiologist needs to know
Objective
To familiarize radiologists with the methodology used in the assessment and management of hypersensitivity reactions to contrast agents.
Methods
This review provides diagnostic tools for the appropriate identification this type of reactions, including a checklist of key clinical items and a proposed algorithm to differentiate hypersensitivity reactions from nonspecific reactions and to assess their severity. It also outlines the main in vitro techniques (specific IgE, basophil activation test, mast cell activation test, lymphoblastic transformation test, and ELISpot) and in vivo procedures (skin tests and drug provocation tests) used to identify the culprit contrast agent and guide the selection of a safe alternative.
Results
Although premedication is commonly used, its effectiveness is limited. Administering an alternative contras agent is a more effective strategy, but empirical selection carries a risk of recurrence. Allergy testing enables safer selection of an alternative agent. Integrating allergy evaluation into radiological practice can improve patient safety and outcomes in patients with a history of previous reactions.
Conclusion
Allergological techniques are valuable tools that support radiologists in the safe management of patients with hypersensitivity reaction to contrast agent, particularly in cases requiring re-exposure. The article concludes by presenting a diagnostic algorithm for both immediate and delayed reactions.
Clinical relevance statement
Switching to an alternative contrast agent is the most effective way to prevent a new hypersensitivity reaction. Radiologists should be familiar with the in vivo and in vitro techniques used in the allergy work-up to select a safe alternative agent.
期刊介绍:
European Journal of Radiology is an international journal which aims to communicate to its readers, state-of-the-art information on imaging developments in the form of high quality original research articles and timely reviews on current developments in the field.
Its audience includes clinicians at all levels of training including radiology trainees, newly qualified imaging specialists and the experienced radiologist. Its aim is to inform efficient, appropriate and evidence-based imaging practice to the benefit of patients worldwide.