比较阿莫西林/克拉维酸酯(augmentin)、头孢他啶和头孢曲松对医院革兰氏阴性和阳性细菌的体外活性。

A T Abd-Elalim Eltahawy, R M Khalaf
{"title":"比较阿莫西林/克拉维酸酯(augmentin)、头孢他啶和头孢曲松对医院革兰氏阴性和阳性细菌的体外活性。","authors":"A T Abd-Elalim Eltahawy,&nbsp;R M Khalaf","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The in vitro antibacterial activities of amoxycillin/clavulanate (Augmentin), ceftazidime and ceftriaxone were compared against 330 gram-negative and gram-positive strains isolated from clinical specimens received at the King Abdulaziz University Hospital (KAUH) in Saudi Arabia. The antibacterial susceptibility was determinated by Stokes method and by the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) using an agar dilution method. Ceftazidime and ceftriaxone were the most active antibiotics, inhibiting 90% of the tested strains by obtainable serum concentrations. Augmentin, on the other hand, had much lower activity against most of the strains tested. Ceftazidime's activity was superior to that of ceftriaxone especially against Klebsiella spp., Enterobacter spp., Citrobacter diversus, indole positive Proteus, Providencia stuartii, Acinetobacter calcoaceticus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Ceftriaxone had better activity against Serratia orderefera, Morganella morganii and Staphylococcus aureus. Beta-lactamase stable cephalosporins are therefore a potential replacement for aminoglycosides in the antimicrobial therapy of serious Gram-negative infections and alternative agents in the treatment of some Gram-positive infections.</p>","PeriodicalId":9733,"journal":{"name":"Chemioterapia : international journal of the Mediterranean Society of Chemotherapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1988-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative in vitro activity of amoxycillin/clavulanate (augmentin), ceftazidime and ceftriaxone against hospital strains of gram-negative and -positive bacteria.\",\"authors\":\"A T Abd-Elalim Eltahawy,&nbsp;R M Khalaf\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The in vitro antibacterial activities of amoxycillin/clavulanate (Augmentin), ceftazidime and ceftriaxone were compared against 330 gram-negative and gram-positive strains isolated from clinical specimens received at the King Abdulaziz University Hospital (KAUH) in Saudi Arabia. The antibacterial susceptibility was determinated by Stokes method and by the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) using an agar dilution method. Ceftazidime and ceftriaxone were the most active antibiotics, inhibiting 90% of the tested strains by obtainable serum concentrations. Augmentin, on the other hand, had much lower activity against most of the strains tested. Ceftazidime's activity was superior to that of ceftriaxone especially against Klebsiella spp., Enterobacter spp., Citrobacter diversus, indole positive Proteus, Providencia stuartii, Acinetobacter calcoaceticus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Ceftriaxone had better activity against Serratia orderefera, Morganella morganii and Staphylococcus aureus. Beta-lactamase stable cephalosporins are therefore a potential replacement for aminoglycosides in the antimicrobial therapy of serious Gram-negative infections and alternative agents in the treatment of some Gram-positive infections.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9733,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chemioterapia : international journal of the Mediterranean Society of Chemotherapy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1988-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chemioterapia : international journal of the Mediterranean Society of Chemotherapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chemioterapia : international journal of the Mediterranean Society of Chemotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

比较了阿莫西林/克拉维酸酯(Augmentin)、头孢他啶和头孢曲松与沙特阿拉伯阿卜杜勒阿齐兹国王大学医院(KAUH)临床标本中分离的330株革兰氏阴性和革兰氏阳性菌株的体外抗菌活性。采用Stokes法和琼脂稀释法测定最小抑菌浓度(MIC)。头孢他啶和头孢曲松是最有效的抗生素,可抑制90%的试验菌株的血清浓度。另一方面,Augmentin对大多数测试菌株的活性要低得多。头孢他啶对克雷伯氏菌、肠杆菌、多样柠檬酸杆菌、吲哚阳性变形杆菌、斯氏普罗维登氏菌、钙酸不动杆菌和铜绿假单胞菌的抑菌活性明显优于头孢曲松。头孢曲松对有序沙雷菌、莫氏摩根菌和金黄色葡萄球菌有较好的抑制作用。因此,β -内酰胺酶稳定型头孢菌素是严重革兰氏阴性感染抗菌治疗中氨基糖苷类药物的潜在替代品,也是治疗某些革兰氏阳性感染的替代药物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative in vitro activity of amoxycillin/clavulanate (augmentin), ceftazidime and ceftriaxone against hospital strains of gram-negative and -positive bacteria.

The in vitro antibacterial activities of amoxycillin/clavulanate (Augmentin), ceftazidime and ceftriaxone were compared against 330 gram-negative and gram-positive strains isolated from clinical specimens received at the King Abdulaziz University Hospital (KAUH) in Saudi Arabia. The antibacterial susceptibility was determinated by Stokes method and by the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) using an agar dilution method. Ceftazidime and ceftriaxone were the most active antibiotics, inhibiting 90% of the tested strains by obtainable serum concentrations. Augmentin, on the other hand, had much lower activity against most of the strains tested. Ceftazidime's activity was superior to that of ceftriaxone especially against Klebsiella spp., Enterobacter spp., Citrobacter diversus, indole positive Proteus, Providencia stuartii, Acinetobacter calcoaceticus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Ceftriaxone had better activity against Serratia orderefera, Morganella morganii and Staphylococcus aureus. Beta-lactamase stable cephalosporins are therefore a potential replacement for aminoglycosides in the antimicrobial therapy of serious Gram-negative infections and alternative agents in the treatment of some Gram-positive infections.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信