思考主动脉：患者对主动脉夹层的认识和观点

IF 41.7 1区医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS

Nature Reviews Cardiology Pub Date : 2025-06-03 DOI:10.1038/s41569-025-01177-4

Gareth Owens

{"title":"思考主动脉：患者对主动脉夹层的认识和观点","authors":"Gareth Owens","doi":"10.1038/s41569-025-01177-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aortic dissection has long been considered a rare, unpreventable and inevitably fatal disease. However, recent advances now prove otherwise. The patient-led Think Aorta campaign is challenging old thinking, improving diagnosis and advocating for better care, such as family screening. Patient advocacy and recent international guidelines classifying the aorta as an organ are catalysts for further improvements in patient care.","PeriodicalId":18976,"journal":{"name":"Nature Reviews Cardiology","volume":"29 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":41.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Think Aorta: aortic dissection awareness and perspectives from the patient\",\"authors\":\"Gareth Owens\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41569-025-01177-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aortic dissection has long been considered a rare, unpreventable and inevitably fatal disease. However, recent advances now prove otherwise. The patient-led Think Aorta campaign is challenging old thinking, improving diagnosis and advocating for better care, such as family screening. Patient advocacy and recent international guidelines classifying the aorta as an organ are catalysts for further improvements in patient care.\",\"PeriodicalId\":18976,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nature Reviews Cardiology\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":41.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nature Reviews Cardiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41569-025-01177-4\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature Reviews Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41569-025-01177-4","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

主动脉夹层一直被认为是一种罕见的、不可预防的、不可避免的致命疾病。然而，最近的进展证明并非如此。由患者主导的“思考主动脉”运动正在挑战旧思维，提高诊断水平，倡导更好的护理，比如家庭筛查。患者倡导和最近的国际指南分类主动脉作为一个器官是催化剂，进一步改善患者护理。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

Think Aorta: aortic dissection awareness and perspectives from the patient

查看原文本刊更多论文

Think Aorta: aortic dissection awareness and perspectives from the patient

Aortic dissection has long been considered a rare, unpreventable and inevitably fatal disease. However, recent advances now prove otherwise. The patient-led Think Aorta campaign is challenging old thinking, improving diagnosis and advocating for better care, such as family screening. Patient advocacy and recent international guidelines classifying the aorta as an organ are catalysts for further improvements in patient care.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Nature Reviews Cardiology 医学-心血管系统

CiteScore

53.10

自引率

0.60%

发文量

143

审稿时长

6-12 weeks

期刊介绍： Nature Reviews Cardiology aims to be the go-to source for reviews and commentaries in the scientific and clinical communities it serves. Focused on providing authoritative and accessible articles enriched with clear figures and tables, the journal strives to offer unparalleled service to authors, referees, and readers, maximizing the usefulness and impact of each publication. It covers a broad range of content types, including Research Highlights, Comments, News & Views, Reviews, Consensus Statements, and Perspectives, catering to practising cardiologists and cardiovascular research scientists. Authored by renowned clinicians, academics, and researchers, the content targets readers in the biological and medical sciences, ensuring accessibility across various disciplines. In-depth Reviews offer up-to-date information, while Consensus Statements provide evidence-based recommendations. Perspectives and News & Views present topical discussions and opinions, and the Research Highlights section filters primary research from cardiovascular and general medical journals. As part of the Nature Reviews portfolio, Nature Reviews Cardiology maintains high standards and a wide reach.