致幻与非致幻裸盖菇素在心理健康治疗中的态度。

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Araam Abboud, Clay Schiebrel, Ramzi W Nahhas, Sam Durkin, Kyle Hua, Hannah Redding, Danielle Gainer
{"title":"致幻与非致幻裸盖菇素在心理健康治疗中的态度。","authors":"Araam Abboud, Clay Schiebrel, Ramzi W Nahhas, Sam Durkin, Kyle Hua, Hannah Redding, Danielle Gainer","doi":"10.1080/02791072.2025.2511752","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study examined patient perspectives on psilocybin therapy, specifically their acceptance and views on the therapeutic benefits of both hallucinogenic and non-hallucinogenic forms. A cross-sectional survey was conducted among psychiatric patients aged 18-65 at a community mental health center, assessing their attitudes, knowledge, and acceptance of psilocybin therapy. In total, 62.4% of the participants expressed openness to hallucinogenic psilocybin (<i>p</i> = .009), while 60.4% were open to non-hallucinogenic forms (<i>p</i> = .023). Patients with major depressive disorder preferred hallucinogenic therapy more (<i>p</i> = .010), while those with borderline personality disorder (BPD) (<i>p</i> = .030) and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) (<i>p</i> = .035) favored non-hallucinogenic options, possibly due to concerns about the intensity of hallucinogenic experiences. Individuals with substance use disorder (SUD) demonstrated a greater acceptance of both hallucinogenic (<i>p</i> = .007) and non-hallucinogenic forms (<i>p</i> = .046) than individuals without SUD. These findings suggest that societal stigma is not a significant barrier to psilocybin therapy and that non-hallucinogenic forms may provide a more accessible option for certain patient groups. Understanding patient perspectives on psilocybin therapy, including vulnerability to adverse hallucinogenic experiences, can inform personalized and effective treatments for resistant conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":16902,"journal":{"name":"Journal of psychoactive drugs","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patients' Attitudes Toward Hallucinogenic and Non-Hallucinogenic Psilocybin for Mental Health Treatment.\",\"authors\":\"Araam Abboud, Clay Schiebrel, Ramzi W Nahhas, Sam Durkin, Kyle Hua, Hannah Redding, Danielle Gainer\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02791072.2025.2511752\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study examined patient perspectives on psilocybin therapy, specifically their acceptance and views on the therapeutic benefits of both hallucinogenic and non-hallucinogenic forms. A cross-sectional survey was conducted among psychiatric patients aged 18-65 at a community mental health center, assessing their attitudes, knowledge, and acceptance of psilocybin therapy. In total, 62.4% of the participants expressed openness to hallucinogenic psilocybin (<i>p</i> = .009), while 60.4% were open to non-hallucinogenic forms (<i>p</i> = .023). Patients with major depressive disorder preferred hallucinogenic therapy more (<i>p</i> = .010), while those with borderline personality disorder (BPD) (<i>p</i> = .030) and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) (<i>p</i> = .035) favored non-hallucinogenic options, possibly due to concerns about the intensity of hallucinogenic experiences. Individuals with substance use disorder (SUD) demonstrated a greater acceptance of both hallucinogenic (<i>p</i> = .007) and non-hallucinogenic forms (<i>p</i> = .046) than individuals without SUD. These findings suggest that societal stigma is not a significant barrier to psilocybin therapy and that non-hallucinogenic forms may provide a more accessible option for certain patient groups. Understanding patient perspectives on psilocybin therapy, including vulnerability to adverse hallucinogenic experiences, can inform personalized and effective treatments for resistant conditions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16902,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of psychoactive drugs\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of psychoactive drugs\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02791072.2025.2511752\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of psychoactive drugs","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02791072.2025.2511752","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究调查了患者对裸盖菇素治疗的看法,特别是他们对致幻和非致幻形式的治疗益处的接受程度和看法。对某社区精神卫生中心18-65岁的精神病患者进行了横断面调查,评估他们对裸盖菇素治疗的态度、知识和接受程度。总的来说,62.4%的参与者表示对致幻裸盖菇素持开放态度(p = 0.009),而60.4%的参与者对非致幻形式持开放态度(p = 0.023)。重度抑郁症患者更倾向于致幻治疗(p = 0.010),而边缘型人格障碍(BPD)患者(p = 0.030)和创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)患者(p = 0.035)更倾向于非致幻治疗,可能是由于担心致幻体验的强度。与没有物质使用障碍的个体相比,有物质使用障碍(SUD)的个体对致幻剂(p = .007)和非致幻剂形式(p = .046)的接受度更高。这些发现表明,社会耻辱并不是裸盖菇素治疗的重大障碍,非致幻剂形式可能为某些患者群体提供了更容易获得的选择。了解患者对裸盖菇素治疗的看法,包括对不良致幻经历的脆弱性,可以为耐药性疾病的个性化和有效治疗提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Patients' Attitudes Toward Hallucinogenic and Non-Hallucinogenic Psilocybin for Mental Health Treatment.

This study examined patient perspectives on psilocybin therapy, specifically their acceptance and views on the therapeutic benefits of both hallucinogenic and non-hallucinogenic forms. A cross-sectional survey was conducted among psychiatric patients aged 18-65 at a community mental health center, assessing their attitudes, knowledge, and acceptance of psilocybin therapy. In total, 62.4% of the participants expressed openness to hallucinogenic psilocybin (p = .009), while 60.4% were open to non-hallucinogenic forms (p = .023). Patients with major depressive disorder preferred hallucinogenic therapy more (p = .010), while those with borderline personality disorder (BPD) (p = .030) and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) (p = .035) favored non-hallucinogenic options, possibly due to concerns about the intensity of hallucinogenic experiences. Individuals with substance use disorder (SUD) demonstrated a greater acceptance of both hallucinogenic (p = .007) and non-hallucinogenic forms (p = .046) than individuals without SUD. These findings suggest that societal stigma is not a significant barrier to psilocybin therapy and that non-hallucinogenic forms may provide a more accessible option for certain patient groups. Understanding patient perspectives on psilocybin therapy, including vulnerability to adverse hallucinogenic experiences, can inform personalized and effective treatments for resistant conditions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
7.10%
发文量
62
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信