S-MAPA:弥合银屑病严重程度评估的差距。

IF 1.3 Q2 DERMATOLOGY
Trang Thi Thuy Vu, Chuyen Thi Hong Nguyen, Trung The Van
{"title":"S-MAPA:弥合银屑病严重程度评估的差距。","authors":"Trang Thi Thuy Vu, Chuyen Thi Hong Nguyen, Trung The Van","doi":"10.4081/dr.2025.10231","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) is widely used to evaluate psoriatic disease activity in clinical settings; however, its limitations hinder its practicality in routine use. The Simple-Measure for Assessing Psoriasis Severity (S-MAPA) has emerged as a promising tool addressing these limitations, providing a more feasible approach for assessing disease severity. This study aimed to evaluate the S-MAPA as a sensitive and practical alternative to existing instruments for measuring psoriasis severity. Patients with psoriasis were assessed using body surface area (BSA), the Physician's Global Assessment (PGA), S-MAPA, PASI, and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI). Plasma high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) levels were also measured. Spearman's correlation analysis compared the relationships between these assessment tools and hs-CRP levels. In total, 100 assessments were conducted between January and July 2019. The S-MAPA score and PASI showed a strong positive correlation with disease severity (r=0.9315, p<0.01). Both the S-MAPA score and PASI exhibited comparable correlations with hs-CRP levels (r=0.5299 vs. 0.5316) and the DLQI (r=0.2533 vs. 0.2641). The S-MAPA score demonstrated stronger correlations with the PASI, DLQI, and hs-CRP level than with BSA or the PGA score. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the S-MAPA was 0.9787, with an optimal cut-off value of 138 for predicting severe psoriasis (sensitivity, 92.59%; specificity, 95.89%). Based on our findings, the S-MAPA is a reliable and practical alternative for assessing the severity of psoriasis in clinical practice, offering advantages over conventional measures.</p>","PeriodicalId":11049,"journal":{"name":"Dermatology Reports","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"S-MAPA: bridging the gap in psoriasis severity assessment.\",\"authors\":\"Trang Thi Thuy Vu, Chuyen Thi Hong Nguyen, Trung The Van\",\"doi\":\"10.4081/dr.2025.10231\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) is widely used to evaluate psoriatic disease activity in clinical settings; however, its limitations hinder its practicality in routine use. The Simple-Measure for Assessing Psoriasis Severity (S-MAPA) has emerged as a promising tool addressing these limitations, providing a more feasible approach for assessing disease severity. This study aimed to evaluate the S-MAPA as a sensitive and practical alternative to existing instruments for measuring psoriasis severity. Patients with psoriasis were assessed using body surface area (BSA), the Physician's Global Assessment (PGA), S-MAPA, PASI, and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI). Plasma high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) levels were also measured. Spearman's correlation analysis compared the relationships between these assessment tools and hs-CRP levels. In total, 100 assessments were conducted between January and July 2019. The S-MAPA score and PASI showed a strong positive correlation with disease severity (r=0.9315, p<0.01). Both the S-MAPA score and PASI exhibited comparable correlations with hs-CRP levels (r=0.5299 vs. 0.5316) and the DLQI (r=0.2533 vs. 0.2641). The S-MAPA score demonstrated stronger correlations with the PASI, DLQI, and hs-CRP level than with BSA or the PGA score. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the S-MAPA was 0.9787, with an optimal cut-off value of 138 for predicting severe psoriasis (sensitivity, 92.59%; specificity, 95.89%). Based on our findings, the S-MAPA is a reliable and practical alternative for assessing the severity of psoriasis in clinical practice, offering advantages over conventional measures.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11049,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dermatology Reports\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dermatology Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4081/dr.2025.10231\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DERMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dermatology Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4081/dr.2025.10231","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

银屑病面积和严重程度指数(PASI)被广泛用于临床评估银屑病的活动性;然而,它的局限性阻碍了它在日常应用中的实用性。银屑病严重程度评估简易测量法(S-MAPA)作为一种有前景的工具,解决了这些局限性,为评估疾病严重程度提供了更可行的方法。本研究旨在评估S-MAPA作为现有银屑病严重程度测量仪器的敏感和实用替代方案。采用体表面积(BSA)、医师整体评估(PGA)、S-MAPA、PASI和皮肤病生活质量指数(DLQI)对银屑病患者进行评估。同时检测血浆高敏c反应蛋白(hs-CRP)水平。Spearman的相关分析比较了这些评估工具与hs-CRP水平之间的关系。2019年1月至7月期间共进行了100次评估。S-MAPA评分和PASI与疾病严重程度呈显著正相关(r=0.9315, p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
S-MAPA: bridging the gap in psoriasis severity assessment.

The Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) is widely used to evaluate psoriatic disease activity in clinical settings; however, its limitations hinder its practicality in routine use. The Simple-Measure for Assessing Psoriasis Severity (S-MAPA) has emerged as a promising tool addressing these limitations, providing a more feasible approach for assessing disease severity. This study aimed to evaluate the S-MAPA as a sensitive and practical alternative to existing instruments for measuring psoriasis severity. Patients with psoriasis were assessed using body surface area (BSA), the Physician's Global Assessment (PGA), S-MAPA, PASI, and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI). Plasma high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) levels were also measured. Spearman's correlation analysis compared the relationships between these assessment tools and hs-CRP levels. In total, 100 assessments were conducted between January and July 2019. The S-MAPA score and PASI showed a strong positive correlation with disease severity (r=0.9315, p<0.01). Both the S-MAPA score and PASI exhibited comparable correlations with hs-CRP levels (r=0.5299 vs. 0.5316) and the DLQI (r=0.2533 vs. 0.2641). The S-MAPA score demonstrated stronger correlations with the PASI, DLQI, and hs-CRP level than with BSA or the PGA score. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the S-MAPA was 0.9787, with an optimal cut-off value of 138 for predicting severe psoriasis (sensitivity, 92.59%; specificity, 95.89%). Based on our findings, the S-MAPA is a reliable and practical alternative for assessing the severity of psoriasis in clinical practice, offering advantages over conventional measures.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Dermatology Reports
Dermatology Reports DERMATOLOGY-
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
74
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信