表面消毒的系统综述:喷洒与擦拭预防COVID-19。

IF 0.6 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Journal of Public Health in Africa Pub Date : 2025-01-28 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.4102/jphia.v16i2.597
Babasola O Okusanya, Muzzammil Gadanya, Anthony Nlemadim, Victoria Adaramoye, David O Akeju, John Ehiri, Martin M Meremiku
{"title":"表面消毒的系统综述:喷洒与擦拭预防COVID-19。","authors":"Babasola O Okusanya, Muzzammil Gadanya, Anthony Nlemadim, Victoria Adaramoye, David O Akeju, John Ehiri, Martin M Meremiku","doi":"10.4102/jphia.v16i2.597","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Within countries, community spread of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) propagated the infection despite the use of non-pharmaceutical interventions.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate the effectiveness of disinfecting surfaces and materials in the community by spraying compared with wiping (mechanical cleaning) or nothing for SARS-CoV-2 infection prevention.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>This research was conducted in a global context.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We searched six databases for eligible studies from 01 January 2020 to 06 September 2022. Spraying disinfectants was the intervention, while wiping or nothing was the comparison. Review outcomes include SARS-CoV-2 infection, the incidence of adverse effects and operator satisfaction. The review was registered on Prospero: CRD42022356276.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found no studies that compared spraying with wiping or had human participants. Three studies with indirect evidence, published between 2021 and 2022 in Japan, South Korea and Spain, were included. Dry fog spraying of 8 700 parts per million (ppm) of hypochlorous acid solution or 56 400 ppm of hydrogen peroxide solution reduced the infectious viral titre. Wiping with 1000 ppm of sodium hypochlorite for 1 min completely reduces SARS-CoV-2 viruses on stainless steel. Also, wiping with 500 ppm of bleach for 5 min completely reduces the virus on kraft paper and polypropylene. No viruses were detected on any surface after wiping with 1000 ppm of bleach for 5 min.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This review provides basic scientific evidence that either spraying disinfectants as dry fog or wiping has some disinfectant effects on surfaces and materials.</p><p><strong>Contribution: </strong>Although the review included no human studies, both methods of disinfection can be practiced in the community for SARS-CoV-2 infection prevention.</p>","PeriodicalId":44723,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Public Health in Africa","volume":"16 2","pages":"597"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12104846/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Systematic review of surface disinfection: Spraying versus wiping for COVID-19 prevention.\",\"authors\":\"Babasola O Okusanya, Muzzammil Gadanya, Anthony Nlemadim, Victoria Adaramoye, David O Akeju, John Ehiri, Martin M Meremiku\",\"doi\":\"10.4102/jphia.v16i2.597\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Within countries, community spread of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) propagated the infection despite the use of non-pharmaceutical interventions.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate the effectiveness of disinfecting surfaces and materials in the community by spraying compared with wiping (mechanical cleaning) or nothing for SARS-CoV-2 infection prevention.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>This research was conducted in a global context.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We searched six databases for eligible studies from 01 January 2020 to 06 September 2022. Spraying disinfectants was the intervention, while wiping or nothing was the comparison. Review outcomes include SARS-CoV-2 infection, the incidence of adverse effects and operator satisfaction. The review was registered on Prospero: CRD42022356276.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found no studies that compared spraying with wiping or had human participants. Three studies with indirect evidence, published between 2021 and 2022 in Japan, South Korea and Spain, were included. Dry fog spraying of 8 700 parts per million (ppm) of hypochlorous acid solution or 56 400 ppm of hydrogen peroxide solution reduced the infectious viral titre. Wiping with 1000 ppm of sodium hypochlorite for 1 min completely reduces SARS-CoV-2 viruses on stainless steel. Also, wiping with 500 ppm of bleach for 5 min completely reduces the virus on kraft paper and polypropylene. No viruses were detected on any surface after wiping with 1000 ppm of bleach for 5 min.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This review provides basic scientific evidence that either spraying disinfectants as dry fog or wiping has some disinfectant effects on surfaces and materials.</p><p><strong>Contribution: </strong>Although the review included no human studies, both methods of disinfection can be practiced in the community for SARS-CoV-2 infection prevention.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":44723,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Public Health in Africa\",\"volume\":\"16 2\",\"pages\":\"597\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12104846/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Public Health in Africa\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4102/jphia.v16i2.597\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Public Health in Africa","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/jphia.v16i2.597","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在国家内部,尽管采用了非药物干预措施,但严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒-2 (SARS-CoV-2)的社区传播仍在传播感染。目的:评价喷洒消毒与擦拭(机械清洁)或不擦拭消毒在预防社区表面和物品感染中的效果。背景:本研究是在全球背景下进行的。方法:我们从2020年1月1日至2022年9月6日检索了6个数据库中符合条件的研究。喷洒消毒剂是干预,而擦拭或不擦拭是比较。评估结果包括SARS-CoV-2感染、不良反应发生率和操作人员满意度。该综述已在Prospero上注册:CRD42022356276。结果:我们没有发现将喷雾与擦拭进行比较或有人类参与者的研究。研究纳入了2021年至2022年间在日本、韩国和西班牙发表的三项有间接证据的研究。用8 700 ppm的次氯酸溶液或56 400 ppm的过氧化氢溶液干雾喷洒可降低感染性病毒滴度。用1000ppm的次氯酸钠擦拭1分钟,可以完全减少不锈钢上的SARS-CoV-2病毒。此外,用500ppm的漂白剂擦拭5分钟,可以完全减少牛皮纸和聚丙烯上的病毒。用1000ppm的漂白剂擦拭5分钟后,表面未检出病毒。结论:以干雾方式喷洒消毒剂或擦拭消毒剂对表面和材料有一定的消毒作用,这是基本的科学依据。贡献:虽然本综述未包括人体研究,但这两种消毒方法都可以在社区中实施,以预防SARS-CoV-2感染。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Systematic review of surface disinfection: Spraying versus wiping for COVID-19 prevention.

Background: Within countries, community spread of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) propagated the infection despite the use of non-pharmaceutical interventions.

Aim: To evaluate the effectiveness of disinfecting surfaces and materials in the community by spraying compared with wiping (mechanical cleaning) or nothing for SARS-CoV-2 infection prevention.

Setting: This research was conducted in a global context.

Method: We searched six databases for eligible studies from 01 January 2020 to 06 September 2022. Spraying disinfectants was the intervention, while wiping or nothing was the comparison. Review outcomes include SARS-CoV-2 infection, the incidence of adverse effects and operator satisfaction. The review was registered on Prospero: CRD42022356276.

Results: We found no studies that compared spraying with wiping or had human participants. Three studies with indirect evidence, published between 2021 and 2022 in Japan, South Korea and Spain, were included. Dry fog spraying of 8 700 parts per million (ppm) of hypochlorous acid solution or 56 400 ppm of hydrogen peroxide solution reduced the infectious viral titre. Wiping with 1000 ppm of sodium hypochlorite for 1 min completely reduces SARS-CoV-2 viruses on stainless steel. Also, wiping with 500 ppm of bleach for 5 min completely reduces the virus on kraft paper and polypropylene. No viruses were detected on any surface after wiping with 1000 ppm of bleach for 5 min.

Conclusion: This review provides basic scientific evidence that either spraying disinfectants as dry fog or wiping has some disinfectant effects on surfaces and materials.

Contribution: Although the review included no human studies, both methods of disinfection can be practiced in the community for SARS-CoV-2 infection prevention.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Public Health in Africa
Journal of Public Health in Africa PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
82
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Public Health in Africa (JPHiA) is a peer-reviewed, academic journal that focuses on health issues in the African continent. The journal editors seek high quality original articles on public health related issues, reviews, comments and more. The aim of the journal is to move public health discourse from the background to the forefront. The success of Africa’s struggle against disease depends on public health approaches.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信