{"title":"经骨和包膜联合修复可提高三角纤维软骨复合体撕裂的握力:一项随机对照试验。","authors":"Lutian Liao, Fei Xiong, Fengming Gu, Xiaodong Fang, Qiuwen Ying, Xiaoyun Pan, Jingyi Mi","doi":"10.1016/j.arthro.2025.05.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the clinical outcomes of arthroscopically assisted transosseous repair versus combined transosseous and capsular repair for triangular fibrocartilage complex tears in patients with distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) instability.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients treated for triangular fibrocartilage complex injuries (Atzei class 2) causing DRUJ instability between September 2020 and September 2022 were prospectively randomized into 2 treatment groups based on the surgical approach: Group A underwent transosseous repair (n = 20), whereas group B underwent combined transosseous and capsular repair (n = 20). Preoperative and postoperative follow-up data of patients were recorded, including DRUJ stability; visual analog scale score; Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score; Modified Mayo Wrist Score (MMWS); wrist range of motion (ROM; flexion and extension, ulnar-radial deviation, and forearm rotation); and grip strength ratio (compared with the contralateral side). Complications were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty participants were enrolled in this prospective randomized controlled trial. All patients completed the mandated minimum 24-month follow-up (median, 36 months; range, 24-48 months). Concerning grip strength recovery, group B (94.2% ± 4.2%) had significantly better outcomes than group A (84.2% ± 4.3%, P < .001). Clinically meaningful improvements were observed in the grip strength ratio (100%). Group B showed superior grip strength recovery (P < .001). Regarding DRUJ stability grades, group B included 15 patients with grade 0 and 5 with grade 1 whereas group A included 10 patients with grade 0 and 10 with grade 1 (P = .102). No statistically significant differences in wrist flexion-extension, forearm rotation, and ulnar-radial deviation were observed between groups A and B (P > .05 for all comparisons). The differences in visual analog scale score, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score, and MMWS were not statistically significant (all P > .05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Arthroscopy-assisted transosseous repair with capsular augmentation showed significantly superior grip strength recovery compared with transosseous repair alone; both techniques achieved significant improvements in postoperative functional outcomes, pain reduction, MMWS, and wrist ROM.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level Ⅰ, randomized controlled trial.</p>","PeriodicalId":55459,"journal":{"name":"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Combined Transosseous and Capsular Repair Improves Grip Strength in Triangular Fibrocartilage Complex Tears: A Randomized Controlled Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Lutian Liao, Fei Xiong, Fengming Gu, Xiaodong Fang, Qiuwen Ying, Xiaoyun Pan, Jingyi Mi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.arthro.2025.05.005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the clinical outcomes of arthroscopically assisted transosseous repair versus combined transosseous and capsular repair for triangular fibrocartilage complex tears in patients with distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) instability.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients treated for triangular fibrocartilage complex injuries (Atzei class 2) causing DRUJ instability between September 2020 and September 2022 were prospectively randomized into 2 treatment groups based on the surgical approach: Group A underwent transosseous repair (n = 20), whereas group B underwent combined transosseous and capsular repair (n = 20). Preoperative and postoperative follow-up data of patients were recorded, including DRUJ stability; visual analog scale score; Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score; Modified Mayo Wrist Score (MMWS); wrist range of motion (ROM; flexion and extension, ulnar-radial deviation, and forearm rotation); and grip strength ratio (compared with the contralateral side). Complications were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty participants were enrolled in this prospective randomized controlled trial. All patients completed the mandated minimum 24-month follow-up (median, 36 months; range, 24-48 months). Concerning grip strength recovery, group B (94.2% ± 4.2%) had significantly better outcomes than group A (84.2% ± 4.3%, P < .001). Clinically meaningful improvements were observed in the grip strength ratio (100%). Group B showed superior grip strength recovery (P < .001). Regarding DRUJ stability grades, group B included 15 patients with grade 0 and 5 with grade 1 whereas group A included 10 patients with grade 0 and 10 with grade 1 (P = .102). No statistically significant differences in wrist flexion-extension, forearm rotation, and ulnar-radial deviation were observed between groups A and B (P > .05 for all comparisons). The differences in visual analog scale score, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score, and MMWS were not statistically significant (all P > .05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Arthroscopy-assisted transosseous repair with capsular augmentation showed significantly superior grip strength recovery compared with transosseous repair alone; both techniques achieved significant improvements in postoperative functional outcomes, pain reduction, MMWS, and wrist ROM.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level Ⅰ, randomized controlled trial.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55459,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2025.05.005\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2025.05.005","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Combined Transosseous and Capsular Repair Improves Grip Strength in Triangular Fibrocartilage Complex Tears: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Purpose: To compare the clinical outcomes of arthroscopically assisted transosseous repair versus combined transosseous and capsular repair for triangular fibrocartilage complex tears in patients with distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) instability.
Methods: Patients treated for triangular fibrocartilage complex injuries (Atzei class 2) causing DRUJ instability between September 2020 and September 2022 were prospectively randomized into 2 treatment groups based on the surgical approach: Group A underwent transosseous repair (n = 20), whereas group B underwent combined transosseous and capsular repair (n = 20). Preoperative and postoperative follow-up data of patients were recorded, including DRUJ stability; visual analog scale score; Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score; Modified Mayo Wrist Score (MMWS); wrist range of motion (ROM; flexion and extension, ulnar-radial deviation, and forearm rotation); and grip strength ratio (compared with the contralateral side). Complications were recorded.
Results: Forty participants were enrolled in this prospective randomized controlled trial. All patients completed the mandated minimum 24-month follow-up (median, 36 months; range, 24-48 months). Concerning grip strength recovery, group B (94.2% ± 4.2%) had significantly better outcomes than group A (84.2% ± 4.3%, P < .001). Clinically meaningful improvements were observed in the grip strength ratio (100%). Group B showed superior grip strength recovery (P < .001). Regarding DRUJ stability grades, group B included 15 patients with grade 0 and 5 with grade 1 whereas group A included 10 patients with grade 0 and 10 with grade 1 (P = .102). No statistically significant differences in wrist flexion-extension, forearm rotation, and ulnar-radial deviation were observed between groups A and B (P > .05 for all comparisons). The differences in visual analog scale score, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score, and MMWS were not statistically significant (all P > .05).
Conclusions: Arthroscopy-assisted transosseous repair with capsular augmentation showed significantly superior grip strength recovery compared with transosseous repair alone; both techniques achieved significant improvements in postoperative functional outcomes, pain reduction, MMWS, and wrist ROM.
Level of evidence: Level Ⅰ, randomized controlled trial.
期刊介绍:
Nowhere is minimally invasive surgery explained better than in Arthroscopy, the leading peer-reviewed journal in the field. Every issue enables you to put into perspective the usefulness of the various emerging arthroscopic techniques. The advantages and disadvantages of these methods -- along with their applications in various situations -- are discussed in relation to their efficiency, efficacy and cost benefit. As a special incentive, paid subscribers also receive access to the journal expanded website.