经骨和包膜联合修复可提高三角纤维软骨复合体撕裂的握力:一项随机对照试验。

IF 4.4 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Lutian Liao, Fei Xiong, Fengming Gu, Xiaodong Fang, Qiuwen Ying, Xiaoyun Pan, Jingyi Mi
{"title":"经骨和包膜联合修复可提高三角纤维软骨复合体撕裂的握力:一项随机对照试验。","authors":"Lutian Liao, Fei Xiong, Fengming Gu, Xiaodong Fang, Qiuwen Ying, Xiaoyun Pan, Jingyi Mi","doi":"10.1016/j.arthro.2025.05.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the clinical outcomes of arthroscopically assisted transosseous repair versus combined transosseous and capsular repair for triangular fibrocartilage complex tears in patients with distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) instability.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients treated for triangular fibrocartilage complex injuries (Atzei class 2) causing DRUJ instability between September 2020 and September 2022 were prospectively randomized into 2 treatment groups based on the surgical approach: Group A underwent transosseous repair (n = 20), whereas group B underwent combined transosseous and capsular repair (n = 20). Preoperative and postoperative follow-up data of patients were recorded, including DRUJ stability; visual analog scale score; Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score; Modified Mayo Wrist Score (MMWS); wrist range of motion (ROM; flexion and extension, ulnar-radial deviation, and forearm rotation); and grip strength ratio (compared with the contralateral side). Complications were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty participants were enrolled in this prospective randomized controlled trial. All patients completed the mandated minimum 24-month follow-up (median, 36 months; range, 24-48 months). Concerning grip strength recovery, group B (94.2% ± 4.2%) had significantly better outcomes than group A (84.2% ± 4.3%, P < .001). Clinically meaningful improvements were observed in the grip strength ratio (100%). Group B showed superior grip strength recovery (P < .001). Regarding DRUJ stability grades, group B included 15 patients with grade 0 and 5 with grade 1 whereas group A included 10 patients with grade 0 and 10 with grade 1 (P = .102). No statistically significant differences in wrist flexion-extension, forearm rotation, and ulnar-radial deviation were observed between groups A and B (P > .05 for all comparisons). The differences in visual analog scale score, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score, and MMWS were not statistically significant (all P > .05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Arthroscopy-assisted transosseous repair with capsular augmentation showed significantly superior grip strength recovery compared with transosseous repair alone; both techniques achieved significant improvements in postoperative functional outcomes, pain reduction, MMWS, and wrist ROM.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level Ⅰ, randomized controlled trial.</p>","PeriodicalId":55459,"journal":{"name":"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Combined Transosseous and Capsular Repair Improves Grip Strength in Triangular Fibrocartilage Complex Tears: A Randomized Controlled Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Lutian Liao, Fei Xiong, Fengming Gu, Xiaodong Fang, Qiuwen Ying, Xiaoyun Pan, Jingyi Mi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.arthro.2025.05.005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the clinical outcomes of arthroscopically assisted transosseous repair versus combined transosseous and capsular repair for triangular fibrocartilage complex tears in patients with distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) instability.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients treated for triangular fibrocartilage complex injuries (Atzei class 2) causing DRUJ instability between September 2020 and September 2022 were prospectively randomized into 2 treatment groups based on the surgical approach: Group A underwent transosseous repair (n = 20), whereas group B underwent combined transosseous and capsular repair (n = 20). Preoperative and postoperative follow-up data of patients were recorded, including DRUJ stability; visual analog scale score; Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score; Modified Mayo Wrist Score (MMWS); wrist range of motion (ROM; flexion and extension, ulnar-radial deviation, and forearm rotation); and grip strength ratio (compared with the contralateral side). Complications were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty participants were enrolled in this prospective randomized controlled trial. All patients completed the mandated minimum 24-month follow-up (median, 36 months; range, 24-48 months). Concerning grip strength recovery, group B (94.2% ± 4.2%) had significantly better outcomes than group A (84.2% ± 4.3%, P < .001). Clinically meaningful improvements were observed in the grip strength ratio (100%). Group B showed superior grip strength recovery (P < .001). Regarding DRUJ stability grades, group B included 15 patients with grade 0 and 5 with grade 1 whereas group A included 10 patients with grade 0 and 10 with grade 1 (P = .102). No statistically significant differences in wrist flexion-extension, forearm rotation, and ulnar-radial deviation were observed between groups A and B (P > .05 for all comparisons). The differences in visual analog scale score, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score, and MMWS were not statistically significant (all P > .05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Arthroscopy-assisted transosseous repair with capsular augmentation showed significantly superior grip strength recovery compared with transosseous repair alone; both techniques achieved significant improvements in postoperative functional outcomes, pain reduction, MMWS, and wrist ROM.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level Ⅰ, randomized controlled trial.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55459,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2025.05.005\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2025.05.005","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:比较关节镜辅助下经骨修复与经骨联合关节囊修复治疗三角区纤维软骨复合体(TFCC)撕裂对远端尺桡关节(DRUJ)不稳定患者的临床效果。方法:将2020年9月至2022年9月期间因TFCC损伤(Atzei 2级)导致DRUJ不稳定的患者根据手术入路前瞻性随机分为两个治疗组:A组(经骨修复,n=20)和B组(经骨联合包膜修复,n=20)。记录患者术前、术后随访资料,包括:DRUJ稳定性;视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分;手臂、肩部和手部残疾(DASH)分数;改良Mayo手腕评分(MMWS);手腕活动范围(ROM;屈伸、尺桡偏和前臂旋转);握力比(与对侧比较)。记录并发症。结果:40名参与者被纳入这项前瞻性随机对照试验。所有患者均完成了规定的至少24个月的随访(中位数:36个月;范围:24 - 48)。握力恢复方面,B组(94.2%±4.2%)明显优于A组(84.2%±4.3%);所有比较P0.05)。VAS评分、DASH评分、MMWS评分差异均无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。结论:与经骨修复术相比,关节镜辅助下经骨带包膜修复术表现出明显更好的握力恢复;两者在术后功能结局、疼痛减轻、MMWS评分和腕关节rom方面均有显著改善。证据水平:水平Ⅰ,随机对照试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Combined Transosseous and Capsular Repair Improves Grip Strength in Triangular Fibrocartilage Complex Tears: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Purpose: To compare the clinical outcomes of arthroscopically assisted transosseous repair versus combined transosseous and capsular repair for triangular fibrocartilage complex tears in patients with distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) instability.

Methods: Patients treated for triangular fibrocartilage complex injuries (Atzei class 2) causing DRUJ instability between September 2020 and September 2022 were prospectively randomized into 2 treatment groups based on the surgical approach: Group A underwent transosseous repair (n = 20), whereas group B underwent combined transosseous and capsular repair (n = 20). Preoperative and postoperative follow-up data of patients were recorded, including DRUJ stability; visual analog scale score; Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score; Modified Mayo Wrist Score (MMWS); wrist range of motion (ROM; flexion and extension, ulnar-radial deviation, and forearm rotation); and grip strength ratio (compared with the contralateral side). Complications were recorded.

Results: Forty participants were enrolled in this prospective randomized controlled trial. All patients completed the mandated minimum 24-month follow-up (median, 36 months; range, 24-48 months). Concerning grip strength recovery, group B (94.2% ± 4.2%) had significantly better outcomes than group A (84.2% ± 4.3%, P < .001). Clinically meaningful improvements were observed in the grip strength ratio (100%). Group B showed superior grip strength recovery (P < .001). Regarding DRUJ stability grades, group B included 15 patients with grade 0 and 5 with grade 1 whereas group A included 10 patients with grade 0 and 10 with grade 1 (P = .102). No statistically significant differences in wrist flexion-extension, forearm rotation, and ulnar-radial deviation were observed between groups A and B (P > .05 for all comparisons). The differences in visual analog scale score, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score, and MMWS were not statistically significant (all P > .05).

Conclusions: Arthroscopy-assisted transosseous repair with capsular augmentation showed significantly superior grip strength recovery compared with transosseous repair alone; both techniques achieved significant improvements in postoperative functional outcomes, pain reduction, MMWS, and wrist ROM.

Level of evidence: Level Ⅰ, randomized controlled trial.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.30
自引率
17.00%
发文量
555
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: Nowhere is minimally invasive surgery explained better than in Arthroscopy, the leading peer-reviewed journal in the field. Every issue enables you to put into perspective the usefulness of the various emerging arthroscopic techniques. The advantages and disadvantages of these methods -- along with their applications in various situations -- are discussed in relation to their efficiency, efficacy and cost benefit. As a special incentive, paid subscribers also receive access to the journal expanded website.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信