{"title":"使用三种旋转文件系统对颈周牙本质复位的比较分析:一项微型计算机断层扫描研究。","authors":"Anuradha Patil, Rutuja Rajput, V Sumanthini Margasahayam, Divya Naik, Jimish Shah, Manasi Surwade","doi":"10.4103/JCDE.JCDE_107_25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Maintaining pericervical dentin (PCD) thickness is crucial for the long-term prognosis of endodontically treated teeth. Root fractures are closely linked to PCD loss, which is influenced by the type of rotary file system used.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>This study compared the effect of three rotary file systems - TruNatomy, OneShape, and ProTaper Gold - on PCD thickness in the mesiobuccal root of mandibular molars using micro-computed tomography (micro-CT).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Twenty-seven mandibular first molars were mounted on wax and scanned using micro-CT before and after instrumentation. Samples were randomly divided into three groups (<i>n</i> = 9) and instrumented per manufacturer guidelines. PCD thickness was measured at 2 mm and 4 mm below the cementoenamel junction (CEJ) on mesial, distal, buccal, and lingual surfaces. Data were analyzed using a paired t-test, one-way analysis of variance, and Tukey's post hoc test (<i>P</i> < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant difference was observed at 4 mm below the CEJ. However, TruNatomy showed significantly less dentin removal at 2 mm (<i>P</i> = 0.003).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>TruNatomy preserved the most dentin, followed by ProTaper Gold and OneShape. Selecting appropriate rotary instruments can help minimize dentin loss and enhance the longevity of endodontically treated teeth.</p>","PeriodicalId":516842,"journal":{"name":"Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics","volume":"28 4","pages":"377-383"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12037117/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative analysis of pericervical dentin reduction using three rotary file systems: A micro-computed tomography study.\",\"authors\":\"Anuradha Patil, Rutuja Rajput, V Sumanthini Margasahayam, Divya Naik, Jimish Shah, Manasi Surwade\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/JCDE.JCDE_107_25\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Maintaining pericervical dentin (PCD) thickness is crucial for the long-term prognosis of endodontically treated teeth. Root fractures are closely linked to PCD loss, which is influenced by the type of rotary file system used.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>This study compared the effect of three rotary file systems - TruNatomy, OneShape, and ProTaper Gold - on PCD thickness in the mesiobuccal root of mandibular molars using micro-computed tomography (micro-CT).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Twenty-seven mandibular first molars were mounted on wax and scanned using micro-CT before and after instrumentation. Samples were randomly divided into three groups (<i>n</i> = 9) and instrumented per manufacturer guidelines. PCD thickness was measured at 2 mm and 4 mm below the cementoenamel junction (CEJ) on mesial, distal, buccal, and lingual surfaces. Data were analyzed using a paired t-test, one-way analysis of variance, and Tukey's post hoc test (<i>P</i> < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant difference was observed at 4 mm below the CEJ. However, TruNatomy showed significantly less dentin removal at 2 mm (<i>P</i> = 0.003).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>TruNatomy preserved the most dentin, followed by ProTaper Gold and OneShape. Selecting appropriate rotary instruments can help minimize dentin loss and enhance the longevity of endodontically treated teeth.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":516842,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics\",\"volume\":\"28 4\",\"pages\":\"377-383\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12037117/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/JCDE.JCDE_107_25\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/3 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/JCDE.JCDE_107_25","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparative analysis of pericervical dentin reduction using three rotary file systems: A micro-computed tomography study.
Background: Maintaining pericervical dentin (PCD) thickness is crucial for the long-term prognosis of endodontically treated teeth. Root fractures are closely linked to PCD loss, which is influenced by the type of rotary file system used.
Aims: This study compared the effect of three rotary file systems - TruNatomy, OneShape, and ProTaper Gold - on PCD thickness in the mesiobuccal root of mandibular molars using micro-computed tomography (micro-CT).
Materials and methods: Twenty-seven mandibular first molars were mounted on wax and scanned using micro-CT before and after instrumentation. Samples were randomly divided into three groups (n = 9) and instrumented per manufacturer guidelines. PCD thickness was measured at 2 mm and 4 mm below the cementoenamel junction (CEJ) on mesial, distal, buccal, and lingual surfaces. Data were analyzed using a paired t-test, one-way analysis of variance, and Tukey's post hoc test (P < 0.05).
Results: No significant difference was observed at 4 mm below the CEJ. However, TruNatomy showed significantly less dentin removal at 2 mm (P = 0.003).
Conclusions: TruNatomy preserved the most dentin, followed by ProTaper Gold and OneShape. Selecting appropriate rotary instruments can help minimize dentin loss and enhance the longevity of endodontically treated teeth.