护士领导的道德困境:一个概念框架。

IF 2.9 1区 哲学 Q1 ETHICS
Preston H Miller
{"title":"护士领导的道德困境:一个概念框架。","authors":"Preston H Miller","doi":"10.1177/09697330251339420","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Moral distress among nurses has been well examined within the literature since the concept's introduction in 1984. Moral distress occurs when constraints result in an individual being unable to act or compelled to act against their professional moral obligations, resulting in a sense of complicity and wrongdoing. Extensive research has explored the experience and consequences of moral distress, particularly among bedside nurses. Despite an abundance of articles regarding moral distress in nursing, few examine the concept among nurse leaders. Leadership roles within nursing can be at the patient care, unit, middle, and executive levels. Existing evidence suggests that nurse leaders experience moral distress similarly to other nursing populations; however, their leadership roles introduce unique challenges and experiences. The purpose of this paper is to present a framework for understanding moral distress among nurse leaders grounded in existing theory and evidence. The Moral Distress Theory, Crescendo Effect, and Ecological Systems Theory served as theoretical frameworks. The conceptual framework was developed from 2022 to 2024 following literature review, empirical (qualitative) validation, and content expert review and validation (<i>n</i> = 5). The Conceptual Framework of Moral Distress Among Nurse Leaders consists of four primary elements: (1) <i>nurse leaders as moral agents within a moral ecology</i>, (2) <i>antecedents of moral distress among nurse leaders</i>, (3) <i>physiological</i>, <i>psychological</i>, <i>and emotional effects of moral distress among nurse leaders</i>, and (4) <i>responsive action(s)</i> versus <i>inaction</i>. This proposed conceptual framework may serve as a foundational understanding of moral distress experienced by nurse leaders and a guide for future moral distress research among nurse leaders.</p>","PeriodicalId":49729,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Ethics","volume":" ","pages":"9697330251339420"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Moral distress among nurse leaders: A conceptual framework.\",\"authors\":\"Preston H Miller\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/09697330251339420\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Moral distress among nurses has been well examined within the literature since the concept's introduction in 1984. Moral distress occurs when constraints result in an individual being unable to act or compelled to act against their professional moral obligations, resulting in a sense of complicity and wrongdoing. Extensive research has explored the experience and consequences of moral distress, particularly among bedside nurses. Despite an abundance of articles regarding moral distress in nursing, few examine the concept among nurse leaders. Leadership roles within nursing can be at the patient care, unit, middle, and executive levels. Existing evidence suggests that nurse leaders experience moral distress similarly to other nursing populations; however, their leadership roles introduce unique challenges and experiences. The purpose of this paper is to present a framework for understanding moral distress among nurse leaders grounded in existing theory and evidence. The Moral Distress Theory, Crescendo Effect, and Ecological Systems Theory served as theoretical frameworks. The conceptual framework was developed from 2022 to 2024 following literature review, empirical (qualitative) validation, and content expert review and validation (<i>n</i> = 5). The Conceptual Framework of Moral Distress Among Nurse Leaders consists of four primary elements: (1) <i>nurse leaders as moral agents within a moral ecology</i>, (2) <i>antecedents of moral distress among nurse leaders</i>, (3) <i>physiological</i>, <i>psychological</i>, <i>and emotional effects of moral distress among nurse leaders</i>, and (4) <i>responsive action(s)</i> versus <i>inaction</i>. This proposed conceptual framework may serve as a foundational understanding of moral distress experienced by nurse leaders and a guide for future moral distress research among nurse leaders.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49729,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nursing Ethics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"9697330251339420\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nursing Ethics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/09697330251339420\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ETHICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Ethics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09697330251339420","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

自1984年概念引入以来,护士的道德困境在文献中得到了很好的研究。当约束导致个人无法采取行动或被迫违反其职业道德义务时,就会出现道德困境,从而产生共谋和不法行为的感觉。广泛的研究探索了道德困扰的经验和后果,特别是在床边护士中。尽管关于护理中的道德困境的文章很多,但很少有人研究护士领导中的概念。护理中的领导角色可以在病人护理,单位,中层和行政层面。现有证据表明,护士领导经历的道德困扰与其他护理人群相似;然而,他们的领导角色带来了独特的挑战和经历。本文的目的是在现有的理论和证据的基础上,提出一个框架来理解护士领导的道德困境。道德困境理论、渐强效应理论和生态系统理论作为理论框架。概念框架是在文献回顾、实证(定性)验证和内容专家审查和验证(n = 5)之后,从2022年到2024年开发的。护士领导道德困境的概念框架包括四个基本要素:(1)护士领导作为道德生态中的道德主体;(2)护士领导道德困境的前因;(3)护士领导道德困境的生理、心理和情感影响;(4)响应性行动与不作为。这一提出的概念框架可以作为对护士领导所经历的道德困境的基本理解,并为未来护士领导的道德困境研究提供指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Moral distress among nurse leaders: A conceptual framework.

Moral distress among nurses has been well examined within the literature since the concept's introduction in 1984. Moral distress occurs when constraints result in an individual being unable to act or compelled to act against their professional moral obligations, resulting in a sense of complicity and wrongdoing. Extensive research has explored the experience and consequences of moral distress, particularly among bedside nurses. Despite an abundance of articles regarding moral distress in nursing, few examine the concept among nurse leaders. Leadership roles within nursing can be at the patient care, unit, middle, and executive levels. Existing evidence suggests that nurse leaders experience moral distress similarly to other nursing populations; however, their leadership roles introduce unique challenges and experiences. The purpose of this paper is to present a framework for understanding moral distress among nurse leaders grounded in existing theory and evidence. The Moral Distress Theory, Crescendo Effect, and Ecological Systems Theory served as theoretical frameworks. The conceptual framework was developed from 2022 to 2024 following literature review, empirical (qualitative) validation, and content expert review and validation (n = 5). The Conceptual Framework of Moral Distress Among Nurse Leaders consists of four primary elements: (1) nurse leaders as moral agents within a moral ecology, (2) antecedents of moral distress among nurse leaders, (3) physiological, psychological, and emotional effects of moral distress among nurse leaders, and (4) responsive action(s) versus inaction. This proposed conceptual framework may serve as a foundational understanding of moral distress experienced by nurse leaders and a guide for future moral distress research among nurse leaders.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nursing Ethics
Nursing Ethics 医学-护理
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
11.90%
发文量
117
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Nursing Ethics takes a practical approach to this complex subject and relates each topic to the working environment. The articles on ethical and legal issues are written in a comprehensible style and official documents are analysed in a user-friendly way. The international Editorial Board ensures the selection of a wide range of high quality articles of global significance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信