医疗事故导航:美国放射科医生指南。

IF 5.2 1区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Radiographics Pub Date : 2025-05-01 DOI:10.1148/rg.240092
Luke M Wojdyla, James Y Chen
{"title":"医疗事故导航:美国放射科医生指南。","authors":"Luke M Wojdyla, James Y Chen","doi":"10.1148/rg.240092","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The majority of radiologists will face litigation in their careers, yet it remains an uncommon topic for training programs and educational conferences. The authors explore the landscape of radiology malpractice litigation to equip radiologists with essential knowledge before and in the event of a lawsuit. Radiologists should understand the four components necessary to be found liable for medical negligence: patient duty, breach of standard of care, injury, and proximate causality between the breach of standard of care and the injury. The authors introduce the mechanics of a lawsuit, common causes of lawsuits, and factors affecting risk. Many current radiologic norms and standards derive from legal precedent; examining these precedents and their effects on current practice through the context of prior litigated cases can help radiologists understand their evolving roles and responsibilities. Ultimately, 63% of malpractice claims are dismissed or dropped, 28% reach settlement agreements, and the remaining claims proceed to trial, where most result in defense wins. Radiologists should be familiar with common practices that may affect their legal risk, as well as potential misunderstandings regarding the discoverability of morbidity and mortality conferences, tumor boards, and other interdisciplinary conferences. Although litigation may not always be preventable, radiologists who understand the U.S. malpractice and medicolegal environment will be better positioned to mitigate unfavorable patient and legal outcomes. <sup>©</sup>RSNA, 2025.</p>","PeriodicalId":54512,"journal":{"name":"Radiographics","volume":"45 5","pages":"e240092"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Navigating Malpractice: Guide for U.S. Radiologists.\",\"authors\":\"Luke M Wojdyla, James Y Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1148/rg.240092\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The majority of radiologists will face litigation in their careers, yet it remains an uncommon topic for training programs and educational conferences. The authors explore the landscape of radiology malpractice litigation to equip radiologists with essential knowledge before and in the event of a lawsuit. Radiologists should understand the four components necessary to be found liable for medical negligence: patient duty, breach of standard of care, injury, and proximate causality between the breach of standard of care and the injury. The authors introduce the mechanics of a lawsuit, common causes of lawsuits, and factors affecting risk. Many current radiologic norms and standards derive from legal precedent; examining these precedents and their effects on current practice through the context of prior litigated cases can help radiologists understand their evolving roles and responsibilities. Ultimately, 63% of malpractice claims are dismissed or dropped, 28% reach settlement agreements, and the remaining claims proceed to trial, where most result in defense wins. Radiologists should be familiar with common practices that may affect their legal risk, as well as potential misunderstandings regarding the discoverability of morbidity and mortality conferences, tumor boards, and other interdisciplinary conferences. Although litigation may not always be preventable, radiologists who understand the U.S. malpractice and medicolegal environment will be better positioned to mitigate unfavorable patient and legal outcomes. <sup>©</sup>RSNA, 2025.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54512,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Radiographics\",\"volume\":\"45 5\",\"pages\":\"e240092\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Radiographics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.240092\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiographics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.240092","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

大多数放射科医生在他们的职业生涯中都会面临诉讼,但这仍然是培训项目和教育会议上不常见的话题。作者探讨景观放射医疗事故诉讼装备放射科医师的基本知识之前和在诉讼的事件。放射科医生应该了解对医疗过失负责的四个必要组成部分:患者责任、违反护理标准、伤害以及违反护理标准与伤害之间的直接因果关系。作者介绍了诉讼的机制,诉讼的常见原因,以及影响风险的因素。许多现行的放射学规范和标准源自法律先例;通过先前诉讼案件的背景检查这些先例及其对当前实践的影响可以帮助放射科医生了解他们不断发展的角色和责任。最终,63%的医疗事故索赔被驳回或撤销,28%达成和解协议,其余索赔进入审判阶段,其中大多数以辩方获胜告终。放射科医生应该熟悉可能影响其法律风险的常见做法,以及关于发病率和死亡率会议、肿瘤委员会和其他跨学科会议的可发现性的潜在误解。虽然诉讼可能并不总是可以预防的,但了解美国医疗事故和医疗法律环境的放射科医生将更好地定位于减轻不利的患者和法律后果。©RSNA, 2025年。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Navigating Malpractice: Guide for U.S. Radiologists.

The majority of radiologists will face litigation in their careers, yet it remains an uncommon topic for training programs and educational conferences. The authors explore the landscape of radiology malpractice litigation to equip radiologists with essential knowledge before and in the event of a lawsuit. Radiologists should understand the four components necessary to be found liable for medical negligence: patient duty, breach of standard of care, injury, and proximate causality between the breach of standard of care and the injury. The authors introduce the mechanics of a lawsuit, common causes of lawsuits, and factors affecting risk. Many current radiologic norms and standards derive from legal precedent; examining these precedents and their effects on current practice through the context of prior litigated cases can help radiologists understand their evolving roles and responsibilities. Ultimately, 63% of malpractice claims are dismissed or dropped, 28% reach settlement agreements, and the remaining claims proceed to trial, where most result in defense wins. Radiologists should be familiar with common practices that may affect their legal risk, as well as potential misunderstandings regarding the discoverability of morbidity and mortality conferences, tumor boards, and other interdisciplinary conferences. Although litigation may not always be preventable, radiologists who understand the U.S. malpractice and medicolegal environment will be better positioned to mitigate unfavorable patient and legal outcomes. ©RSNA, 2025.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Radiographics
Radiographics 医学-核医学
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
5.50%
发文量
224
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Launched by the Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) in 1981, RadioGraphics is one of the premier education journals in diagnostic radiology. Each bimonthly issue features 15–20 practice-focused articles spanning the full spectrum of radiologic subspecialties and addressing topics such as diagnostic imaging techniques, imaging features of a disease or group of diseases, radiologic-pathologic correlation, practice policy and quality initiatives, imaging physics, informatics, and lifelong learning. A special issue, a monograph focused on a single subspecialty or on a crossover topic of interest to multiple subspecialties, is published each October. Each issue offers more than a dozen opportunities to earn continuing medical education credits that qualify for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM and all online activities can be applied toward the ABR MOC Self-Assessment Requirement.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信