George Whitman Kent, John-Christopher A Finley, Mira I Leese, Tyler J Kukla, Hajar Ismail, Brian M Cerny, Jason R Soble, Matthew S Phillips
{"title":"加工速度和记忆对Rey听觉语言学习测验和简短视觉空间记忆测验修正嵌入效度测验的优先影响。","authors":"George Whitman Kent, John-Christopher A Finley, Mira I Leese, Tyler J Kukla, Hajar Ismail, Brian M Cerny, Jason R Soble, Matthew S Phillips","doi":"10.1080/23279095.2025.2492697","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study evaluated the impact of single-domain impairment in processing speed and memory versus multidomain impairment on the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test Forced Choice (RAVLT FC) and Brief Visuospatial Memory Test-Revised Recognition Discrimination (BVMT-R RD) PVTs among a sample of 385 nonconsecutive mixed clinical patients referred for outpatient neuropsychological evaluation. The sample was dichotomized to form valid (<i>n</i> = 307) and invalid (<i>n</i> = 78) groups. The valid study group was subdivided into an intact cognition group (<i>n</i> = 174), single-domain processing speed (<i>n</i> = 27) and memory (<i>n</i> = 59) groups, and a combined speed and memory impairment group (<i>n</i> = 47). The impaired memory group showed acceptable classification accuracy for the RAVLT FC (≤12; 35% sensitivity/90% specificity) and BVMT RD (≤4; 33% sensitivity/90% specificity). The impaired speed group evidenced excellent classification for the RAVLT FC (≤14; 64% sensitivity/96% specificity) and acceptable accuracy for the BVMT RD (≤4; 33% sensitivity/96% specificity). For the impaired speed and memory group, classification accuracy was acceptable for the RAVLT FC (≤12; 35% sensitivity/92% specificity) and poor (although still statistically significant) for the BVMT RD (≤3; 24% sensitivity/94% specificity). Therefore, use of adjusted cut-scores among neuropsychological conditions associated with deficits in memory and/or speed is needed when using these PVTs in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":51308,"journal":{"name":"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Preferential impact of processing speed and memory on Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test and Brief Visuospatial Memory Test-revised embedded performance validity tests.\",\"authors\":\"George Whitman Kent, John-Christopher A Finley, Mira I Leese, Tyler J Kukla, Hajar Ismail, Brian M Cerny, Jason R Soble, Matthew S Phillips\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/23279095.2025.2492697\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study evaluated the impact of single-domain impairment in processing speed and memory versus multidomain impairment on the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test Forced Choice (RAVLT FC) and Brief Visuospatial Memory Test-Revised Recognition Discrimination (BVMT-R RD) PVTs among a sample of 385 nonconsecutive mixed clinical patients referred for outpatient neuropsychological evaluation. The sample was dichotomized to form valid (<i>n</i> = 307) and invalid (<i>n</i> = 78) groups. The valid study group was subdivided into an intact cognition group (<i>n</i> = 174), single-domain processing speed (<i>n</i> = 27) and memory (<i>n</i> = 59) groups, and a combined speed and memory impairment group (<i>n</i> = 47). The impaired memory group showed acceptable classification accuracy for the RAVLT FC (≤12; 35% sensitivity/90% specificity) and BVMT RD (≤4; 33% sensitivity/90% specificity). The impaired speed group evidenced excellent classification for the RAVLT FC (≤14; 64% sensitivity/96% specificity) and acceptable accuracy for the BVMT RD (≤4; 33% sensitivity/96% specificity). For the impaired speed and memory group, classification accuracy was acceptable for the RAVLT FC (≤12; 35% sensitivity/92% specificity) and poor (although still statistically significant) for the BVMT RD (≤3; 24% sensitivity/94% specificity). Therefore, use of adjusted cut-scores among neuropsychological conditions associated with deficits in memory and/or speed is needed when using these PVTs in clinical practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51308,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2025.2492697\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2025.2492697","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Preferential impact of processing speed and memory on Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test and Brief Visuospatial Memory Test-revised embedded performance validity tests.
This study evaluated the impact of single-domain impairment in processing speed and memory versus multidomain impairment on the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test Forced Choice (RAVLT FC) and Brief Visuospatial Memory Test-Revised Recognition Discrimination (BVMT-R RD) PVTs among a sample of 385 nonconsecutive mixed clinical patients referred for outpatient neuropsychological evaluation. The sample was dichotomized to form valid (n = 307) and invalid (n = 78) groups. The valid study group was subdivided into an intact cognition group (n = 174), single-domain processing speed (n = 27) and memory (n = 59) groups, and a combined speed and memory impairment group (n = 47). The impaired memory group showed acceptable classification accuracy for the RAVLT FC (≤12; 35% sensitivity/90% specificity) and BVMT RD (≤4; 33% sensitivity/90% specificity). The impaired speed group evidenced excellent classification for the RAVLT FC (≤14; 64% sensitivity/96% specificity) and acceptable accuracy for the BVMT RD (≤4; 33% sensitivity/96% specificity). For the impaired speed and memory group, classification accuracy was acceptable for the RAVLT FC (≤12; 35% sensitivity/92% specificity) and poor (although still statistically significant) for the BVMT RD (≤3; 24% sensitivity/94% specificity). Therefore, use of adjusted cut-scores among neuropsychological conditions associated with deficits in memory and/or speed is needed when using these PVTs in clinical practice.
期刊介绍:
pplied Neuropsychology-Adult publishes clinical neuropsychological articles concerning assessment, brain functioning and neuroimaging, neuropsychological treatment, and rehabilitation in adults. Full-length articles and brief communications are included. Case studies of adult patients carefully assessing the nature, course, or treatment of clinical neuropsychological dysfunctions in the context of scientific literature, are suitable. Review manuscripts addressing critical issues are encouraged. Preference is given to papers of clinical relevance to others in the field. All submitted manuscripts are subject to initial appraisal by the Editor-in-Chief, and, if found suitable for further considerations are peer reviewed by independent, anonymous expert referees. All peer review is single-blind and submission is online via ScholarOne Manuscripts.