{"title":"评估一个三管齐下的自我评估工具,以提高一年级药学学生的沟通技巧:一项多机构研究。","authors":"Maria Charbonneau , Allissa Long , Jana Murry","doi":"10.1016/j.ajpe.2025.101417","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To evaluate the impact of a novel, three-pronged self-assessment tool on the verbal and nonverbal communication skills of first-year pharmacy (P1) students at two Schools of Pharmacy.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This study, conducted during the 2022–2023 academic year, involved 200 P1 students from two institutions. Students recorded a patient counseling session and utilized the three-pronged tool to self-assess their performance in 3 distinct phases: (1) video-only review for evaluating nonverbal communication, (2) audio-only review for assessing verbal communication, and (3) a combined audio and video review for a comprehensive assessment. Students then recorded a second graded counseling session. Changes in student grades between the initial and subsequent counseling sessions were analyzed using descriptive statistics and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. Qualitative data from self-assessment responses were categorized into themes to explore common communication strengths and areas for improvement.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Cohort 1 (virtual) showed a significant improvement in scores from 76.9% to 88.9%, while Cohort 2 (in person) improved from 94.3% to 95.7%. Cohort 3 (virtual) showed no significant improvement. Students identified strengths and areas for improvement in both nonverbal and verbal communication skills, demonstrating engagement in self-assessment and skill enhancement.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Improved communication skills observed in P1 students were likely influenced by the 3-pronged, self-assessment tool in conjunction with standard faculty feedback and other aspects of the study design. This tool promotes structured self-assessment and continuous improvement, aligning with educational standards and suggesting potential for broader application, pending further validation across diverse educational settings.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55530,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education","volume":"89 6","pages":"Article 101417"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating a Three-Pronged Self-Assessment Tool to Enhance Communication Skills in First-Year Pharmacy Students: A Multi-Institutional Study\",\"authors\":\"Maria Charbonneau , Allissa Long , Jana Murry\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ajpe.2025.101417\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To evaluate the impact of a novel, three-pronged self-assessment tool on the verbal and nonverbal communication skills of first-year pharmacy (P1) students at two Schools of Pharmacy.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This study, conducted during the 2022–2023 academic year, involved 200 P1 students from two institutions. Students recorded a patient counseling session and utilized the three-pronged tool to self-assess their performance in 3 distinct phases: (1) video-only review for evaluating nonverbal communication, (2) audio-only review for assessing verbal communication, and (3) a combined audio and video review for a comprehensive assessment. Students then recorded a second graded counseling session. Changes in student grades between the initial and subsequent counseling sessions were analyzed using descriptive statistics and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. Qualitative data from self-assessment responses were categorized into themes to explore common communication strengths and areas for improvement.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Cohort 1 (virtual) showed a significant improvement in scores from 76.9% to 88.9%, while Cohort 2 (in person) improved from 94.3% to 95.7%. Cohort 3 (virtual) showed no significant improvement. Students identified strengths and areas for improvement in both nonverbal and verbal communication skills, demonstrating engagement in self-assessment and skill enhancement.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Improved communication skills observed in P1 students were likely influenced by the 3-pronged, self-assessment tool in conjunction with standard faculty feedback and other aspects of the study design. This tool promotes structured self-assessment and continuous improvement, aligning with educational standards and suggesting potential for broader application, pending further validation across diverse educational settings.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55530,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education\",\"volume\":\"89 6\",\"pages\":\"Article 101417\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002945925000622\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002945925000622","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Evaluating a Three-Pronged Self-Assessment Tool to Enhance Communication Skills in First-Year Pharmacy Students: A Multi-Institutional Study
Objective
To evaluate the impact of a novel, three-pronged self-assessment tool on the verbal and nonverbal communication skills of first-year pharmacy (P1) students at two Schools of Pharmacy.
Methods
This study, conducted during the 2022–2023 academic year, involved 200 P1 students from two institutions. Students recorded a patient counseling session and utilized the three-pronged tool to self-assess their performance in 3 distinct phases: (1) video-only review for evaluating nonverbal communication, (2) audio-only review for assessing verbal communication, and (3) a combined audio and video review for a comprehensive assessment. Students then recorded a second graded counseling session. Changes in student grades between the initial and subsequent counseling sessions were analyzed using descriptive statistics and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. Qualitative data from self-assessment responses were categorized into themes to explore common communication strengths and areas for improvement.
Results
Cohort 1 (virtual) showed a significant improvement in scores from 76.9% to 88.9%, while Cohort 2 (in person) improved from 94.3% to 95.7%. Cohort 3 (virtual) showed no significant improvement. Students identified strengths and areas for improvement in both nonverbal and verbal communication skills, demonstrating engagement in self-assessment and skill enhancement.
Conclusion
Improved communication skills observed in P1 students were likely influenced by the 3-pronged, self-assessment tool in conjunction with standard faculty feedback and other aspects of the study design. This tool promotes structured self-assessment and continuous improvement, aligning with educational standards and suggesting potential for broader application, pending further validation across diverse educational settings.
期刊介绍:
The Journal accepts unsolicited manuscripts that have not been published and are not under consideration for publication elsewhere. The Journal only considers material related to pharmaceutical education for publication. Authors must prepare manuscripts to conform to the Journal style (Author Instructions). All manuscripts are subject to peer review and approval by the editor prior to acceptance for publication. Reviewers are assigned by the editor with the advice of the editorial board as needed. Manuscripts are submitted and processed online (Submit a Manuscript) using Editorial Manager, an online manuscript tracking system that facilitates communication between the editorial office, editor, associate editors, reviewers, and authors.
After a manuscript is accepted, it is scheduled for publication in an upcoming issue of the Journal. All manuscripts are formatted and copyedited, and returned to the author for review and approval of the changes. Approximately 2 weeks prior to publication, the author receives an electronic proof of the article for final review and approval. Authors are not assessed page charges for publication.