中国TikTok作为食管癌信息来源的质量评估。

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Qi Ding, Lu Kang, Chao Zeng, Lu Chen, Jina Li
{"title":"中国TikTok作为食管癌信息来源的质量评估。","authors":"Qi Ding, Lu Kang, Chao Zeng, Lu Chen, Jina Li","doi":"10.1007/s13187-025-02630-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Esophageal cancer is a prevalent cancer worldwide, with incidence rates rising significantly in recent years, particularly in high-risk regions where case numbers continue to escalate. As one of the most visited social media platforms globally, TikTok has emerged as a key source for health information. This study aims to evaluate Chinese TikTok videos on esophageal cancer, focusing on content integrity, informational quality, source credibility, usefulness, and reliability.: We assessed 246 esophageal cancer-related videos using the Content Integrity Score based on Goobie's coding scheme for content evaluation and the DISCERN instrument for assessing information reliability and treatment guidance. Videos were categorized by duration, source, publication year, and user engagement metrics (likes, comments, favorites, shares). Statistical analysis was conducted using Shapiro-Wilk, Kruskal-Wallis and post hoc Bonferroni tests. Additionally, Spearman's correlation analysis was applied to explore relationships between key quantitative variables. Of the videos analyzed, 212(86.2%) were uploaded by doctors, and 168(68.3%) lacked content related to risk factors. and 217(88.2%) had a quality score rated as poor or below. User engagement metrics, including likes, comments, saves, and shares, exhibited strong intercorrelations. However, only shares showed a weak correlation with DISCERN scores (R = 0.134, p = 0.036). Additionally, DISCERN scores were positively correlated with video duration (R = 0.352, p < 0.001). Chinese TikTok videos on esophageal cancer generally offer low-quality information that lacks accuracy and is insufficient for guiding patients in making informed health decisions. Given the low quality and reliability of such content, TikTok is not a suitable source for patient education.</p>","PeriodicalId":50246,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cancer Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quality Assessment of Chinese TikTok as a Source of Information About Esophageal Cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Qi Ding, Lu Kang, Chao Zeng, Lu Chen, Jina Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s13187-025-02630-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Esophageal cancer is a prevalent cancer worldwide, with incidence rates rising significantly in recent years, particularly in high-risk regions where case numbers continue to escalate. As one of the most visited social media platforms globally, TikTok has emerged as a key source for health information. This study aims to evaluate Chinese TikTok videos on esophageal cancer, focusing on content integrity, informational quality, source credibility, usefulness, and reliability.: We assessed 246 esophageal cancer-related videos using the Content Integrity Score based on Goobie's coding scheme for content evaluation and the DISCERN instrument for assessing information reliability and treatment guidance. Videos were categorized by duration, source, publication year, and user engagement metrics (likes, comments, favorites, shares). Statistical analysis was conducted using Shapiro-Wilk, Kruskal-Wallis and post hoc Bonferroni tests. Additionally, Spearman's correlation analysis was applied to explore relationships between key quantitative variables. Of the videos analyzed, 212(86.2%) were uploaded by doctors, and 168(68.3%) lacked content related to risk factors. and 217(88.2%) had a quality score rated as poor or below. User engagement metrics, including likes, comments, saves, and shares, exhibited strong intercorrelations. However, only shares showed a weak correlation with DISCERN scores (R = 0.134, p = 0.036). Additionally, DISCERN scores were positively correlated with video duration (R = 0.352, p < 0.001). Chinese TikTok videos on esophageal cancer generally offer low-quality information that lacks accuracy and is insufficient for guiding patients in making informed health decisions. Given the low quality and reliability of such content, TikTok is not a suitable source for patient education.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50246,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cancer Education\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cancer Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-025-02630-1\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cancer Education","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-025-02630-1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

食管癌是世界范围内的一种流行癌症,近年来发病率显著上升,特别是在病例数持续上升的高风险地区。作为全球访问量最大的社交媒体平台之一,抖音已成为健康信息的重要来源。本研究旨在评估中国有关食管癌的TikTok视频,重点关注内容完整性、信息质量、来源可信度、有用性和可靠性。我们使用基于Goobie编码方案的内容完整性评分进行内容评估,并使用DISCERN工具评估信息可靠性和治疗指导,对246个食管癌相关视频进行评估。视频按持续时间、来源、发布年份和用户参与指标(喜欢、评论、收藏、分享)进行分类。采用Shapiro-Wilk、Kruskal-Wallis和事后Bonferroni检验进行统计分析。此外,采用Spearman相关分析探讨关键定量变量之间的关系。在分析的视频中,212个(86.2%)是由医生上传的,168个(68.3%)缺乏与危险因素相关的内容。217家(88.2%)的质量评分为差或以下。用户粘性指标,包括点赞、评论、保存和分享,都表现出很强的相关性。然而,只有股票与DISCERN分数呈弱相关(R = 0.134, p = 0.036)。此外,辨别得分与视频时长呈正相关(R = 0.352, p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Quality Assessment of Chinese TikTok as a Source of Information About Esophageal Cancer.

Esophageal cancer is a prevalent cancer worldwide, with incidence rates rising significantly in recent years, particularly in high-risk regions where case numbers continue to escalate. As one of the most visited social media platforms globally, TikTok has emerged as a key source for health information. This study aims to evaluate Chinese TikTok videos on esophageal cancer, focusing on content integrity, informational quality, source credibility, usefulness, and reliability.: We assessed 246 esophageal cancer-related videos using the Content Integrity Score based on Goobie's coding scheme for content evaluation and the DISCERN instrument for assessing information reliability and treatment guidance. Videos were categorized by duration, source, publication year, and user engagement metrics (likes, comments, favorites, shares). Statistical analysis was conducted using Shapiro-Wilk, Kruskal-Wallis and post hoc Bonferroni tests. Additionally, Spearman's correlation analysis was applied to explore relationships between key quantitative variables. Of the videos analyzed, 212(86.2%) were uploaded by doctors, and 168(68.3%) lacked content related to risk factors. and 217(88.2%) had a quality score rated as poor or below. User engagement metrics, including likes, comments, saves, and shares, exhibited strong intercorrelations. However, only shares showed a weak correlation with DISCERN scores (R = 0.134, p = 0.036). Additionally, DISCERN scores were positively correlated with video duration (R = 0.352, p < 0.001). Chinese TikTok videos on esophageal cancer generally offer low-quality information that lacks accuracy and is insufficient for guiding patients in making informed health decisions. Given the low quality and reliability of such content, TikTok is not a suitable source for patient education.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Cancer Education
Journal of Cancer Education 医学-医学:信息
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
6.20%
发文量
122
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cancer Education, the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education (AACE) and the European Association for Cancer Education (EACE), is an international, quarterly journal dedicated to the publication of original contributions dealing with the varied aspects of cancer education for physicians, dentists, nurses, students, social workers and other allied health professionals, patients, the general public, and anyone interested in effective education about cancer related issues. Articles featured include reports of original results of educational research, as well as discussions of current problems and techniques in cancer education. Manuscripts are welcome on such subjects as educational methods, instruments, and program evaluation. Suitable topics include teaching of basic science aspects of cancer; the assessment of attitudes toward cancer patient management; the teaching of diagnostic skills relevant to cancer; the evaluation of undergraduate, postgraduate, or continuing education programs; and articles about all aspects of cancer education from prevention to palliative care. We encourage contributions to a special column called Reflections; these articles should relate to the human aspects of dealing with cancer, cancer patients, and their families and finding meaning and support in these efforts. Letters to the Editor (600 words or less) dealing with published articles or matters of current interest are also invited. Also featured are commentary; book and media reviews; and announcements of educational programs, fellowships, and grants. Articles should be limited to no more than ten double-spaced typed pages, and there should be no more than three tables or figures and 25 references. We also encourage brief reports of five typewritten pages or less, with no more than one figure or table and 15 references.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信