综合医疗护理的患者体验[PEICE]:一项横断面研究

IF 2.8 4区 医学 Q2 INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE
Matthew J Leach , Simon DuBois , Reine DuBois
{"title":"综合医疗护理的患者体验[PEICE]:一项横断面研究","authors":"Matthew J Leach ,&nbsp;Simon DuBois ,&nbsp;Reine DuBois","doi":"10.1016/j.imr.2025.101147","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Although consumer demand and practitioner interest in integrative health care (IHC) have amplified over the past few decades, the patient experience of IHC still remains poorly understood. This study aimed to explore patient’s experiences of receiving care within an IHC setting in Australia.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Adults that had accessed an IHC setting within the past 12 months were invited to participate in a national, cross-sectional study. Individuals meeting the inclusion criteria were asked to complete the 57-item Integrative Healthcare Experience Tool (iHEET), online.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 327 participants completed the iHEET (82.3 % female; 92.9 % aged 30 years or older). Participants reported a generally favourable experience of IHC, as indicated by an overall IHC experience score of 4.19 ± 0.90 (mean ± SD). Mean experience subscores were high for 8 of the 12 IHC experience domains (i.e. respectful, personalised, patient-centred, holistic, interdisciplinary, evidence-based, communicative, wellness-focussed), and moderate for 4 of the 12 domains (i.e. non-hierarchical, collaborative, coordinated, accessible).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The findings of this novel study suggest IHC practice in Australia closely aligns with the philosophy and framework of IHC, and is mostly congruent with what patients want from an IHC service. Notwithstanding, there are several areas where IHC services could improve in order to optimise the patient experience. These areas include providing care that is more visibly collaborative and coordinated, and enabling equitable access to services for diverse patient populations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":13644,"journal":{"name":"Integrative Medicine Research","volume":"14 2","pages":"Article 101147"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patient Experiences of Integrative health CarE [PEICE]: A cross-sectional study\",\"authors\":\"Matthew J Leach ,&nbsp;Simon DuBois ,&nbsp;Reine DuBois\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.imr.2025.101147\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Although consumer demand and practitioner interest in integrative health care (IHC) have amplified over the past few decades, the patient experience of IHC still remains poorly understood. This study aimed to explore patient’s experiences of receiving care within an IHC setting in Australia.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Adults that had accessed an IHC setting within the past 12 months were invited to participate in a national, cross-sectional study. Individuals meeting the inclusion criteria were asked to complete the 57-item Integrative Healthcare Experience Tool (iHEET), online.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 327 participants completed the iHEET (82.3 % female; 92.9 % aged 30 years or older). Participants reported a generally favourable experience of IHC, as indicated by an overall IHC experience score of 4.19 ± 0.90 (mean ± SD). Mean experience subscores were high for 8 of the 12 IHC experience domains (i.e. respectful, personalised, patient-centred, holistic, interdisciplinary, evidence-based, communicative, wellness-focussed), and moderate for 4 of the 12 domains (i.e. non-hierarchical, collaborative, coordinated, accessible).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The findings of this novel study suggest IHC practice in Australia closely aligns with the philosophy and framework of IHC, and is mostly congruent with what patients want from an IHC service. Notwithstanding, there are several areas where IHC services could improve in order to optimise the patient experience. These areas include providing care that is more visibly collaborative and coordinated, and enabling equitable access to services for diverse patient populations.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13644,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Integrative Medicine Research\",\"volume\":\"14 2\",\"pages\":\"Article 101147\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Integrative Medicine Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213422025000277\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Integrative Medicine Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213422025000277","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

虽然在过去的几十年里,消费者的需求和从业者对综合医疗保健(IHC)的兴趣已经扩大,但患者对综合医疗保健的体验仍然知之甚少。本研究旨在探讨患者在澳大利亚的IHC环境中接受护理的经历。方法:在过去12个月内接受过免疫组化治疗的成年人被邀请参加一项全国性的横断面研究。符合纳入标准的个人被要求在线完成包含57个项目的综合医疗体验工具(iHEET)。结果共327名参与者完成了iHEET,其中女性占82.3%;92.9%年龄在30岁或以上)。参与者报告了总体良好的免疫组化体验,总体免疫组化体验得分为4.19±0.90(平均±SD)。12个IHC体验领域中的8个(即尊重、个性化、以患者为中心、整体、跨学科、以证据为基础、沟通、健康为重点)的平均体验子得分较高,12个领域中的4个(即无等级、协作、协调、可访问)的平均体验子得分中等。结论:这项新研究的结果表明,澳大利亚的免疫结合实践与免疫结合的理念和框架密切相关,并且与患者对免疫结合服务的需求基本一致。尽管如此,为了优化患者体验,免疫健康服务仍有几个领域有待改进。这些领域包括提供更加明显的协作和协调的护理,并使不同的患者群体能够公平地获得服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Patient Experiences of Integrative health CarE [PEICE]: A cross-sectional study

Background

Although consumer demand and practitioner interest in integrative health care (IHC) have amplified over the past few decades, the patient experience of IHC still remains poorly understood. This study aimed to explore patient’s experiences of receiving care within an IHC setting in Australia.

Methods

Adults that had accessed an IHC setting within the past 12 months were invited to participate in a national, cross-sectional study. Individuals meeting the inclusion criteria were asked to complete the 57-item Integrative Healthcare Experience Tool (iHEET), online.

Results

A total of 327 participants completed the iHEET (82.3 % female; 92.9 % aged 30 years or older). Participants reported a generally favourable experience of IHC, as indicated by an overall IHC experience score of 4.19 ± 0.90 (mean ± SD). Mean experience subscores were high for 8 of the 12 IHC experience domains (i.e. respectful, personalised, patient-centred, holistic, interdisciplinary, evidence-based, communicative, wellness-focussed), and moderate for 4 of the 12 domains (i.e. non-hierarchical, collaborative, coordinated, accessible).

Conclusion

The findings of this novel study suggest IHC practice in Australia closely aligns with the philosophy and framework of IHC, and is mostly congruent with what patients want from an IHC service. Notwithstanding, there are several areas where IHC services could improve in order to optimise the patient experience. These areas include providing care that is more visibly collaborative and coordinated, and enabling equitable access to services for diverse patient populations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Integrative Medicine Research
Integrative Medicine Research Medicine-Complementary and Alternative Medicine
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
2.90%
发文量
65
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Integrative Medicine Research (IMR) is a quarterly, peer-reviewed journal focused on scientific research for integrative medicine including traditional medicine (emphasis on acupuncture and herbal medicine), complementary and alternative medicine, and systems medicine. The journal includes papers on basic research, clinical research, methodology, theory, computational analysis and modelling, topical reviews, medical history, education and policy based on physiology, pathology, diagnosis and the systems approach in the field of integrative medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信