阿片类药物使用障碍患者近期服用兴奋剂对治疗效果的影响:多站点随机对照试验的二次分析

Cari Coles , Courtney Batts , Joanne Bae , Gabriela León , Alex Schmidt , Sterling M. McPherson , Crystal L. Smith , André C. Miguel
{"title":"阿片类药物使用障碍患者近期服用兴奋剂对治疗效果的影响:多站点随机对照试验的二次分析","authors":"Cari Coles ,&nbsp;Courtney Batts ,&nbsp;Joanne Bae ,&nbsp;Gabriela León ,&nbsp;Alex Schmidt ,&nbsp;Sterling M. McPherson ,&nbsp;Crystal L. Smith ,&nbsp;André C. Miguel","doi":"10.1016/j.dadr.2025.100330","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Illicit stimulant use among individuals initiating medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD) has significantly increased over the past decade. Co-use of these substances is associated with increased risk of mortality as well as worse treatment outcomes. This study examines the potential predictive role of stimulant urinalysis result at baseline on treatment retention and opioid and stimulant use outcomes amongst individuals initiating MOUD treatment.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This is a cross-sectional secondary analysis of data from a multi-site randomized clinical trial (CTN-0027). A total of 1269 individuals were randomized to receive 24 weeks of buprenorphine (n = 740) or methadone (n = 529) treatment across nine sites. Multiple linear and logistic regressions were conducted to determine the impact of baseline stimulant urinalysis results on treatment retention, and stimulant and opioid use outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Individuals initiating MOUD with a stimulant negative urinalysis result at baseline submitted more negative stimulant (ꞵ=7.8; 95 % CI 6.8–8.7) and opioid (ꞵ=2.8; 95 % CI 1.8–3.8) urinalyses during treatment, were more likely to complete treatment (aOR=1.4; 95 % CI 1.1–1.7), and had better outcomes at six-month follow-up, measured as negative urinalysis for stimulant (aOR=5.3; 95 % CI 3.6–7.7), and opioid (aOR=1.8; 95 % CI 1.3–2.6).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Baseline stimulant use is associated with worse MOUD treatment outcomes, underscoring the need for novel integrated interventions designed to address opioid and stimulant co-use.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72841,"journal":{"name":"Drug and alcohol dependence reports","volume":"15 ","pages":"Article 100330"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of recent stimulant use on treatment outcomes amongst individuals initiating medications for opioid use disorders: Secondary analysis of a multisite randomized controlled trial\",\"authors\":\"Cari Coles ,&nbsp;Courtney Batts ,&nbsp;Joanne Bae ,&nbsp;Gabriela León ,&nbsp;Alex Schmidt ,&nbsp;Sterling M. McPherson ,&nbsp;Crystal L. Smith ,&nbsp;André C. Miguel\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.dadr.2025.100330\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Illicit stimulant use among individuals initiating medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD) has significantly increased over the past decade. Co-use of these substances is associated with increased risk of mortality as well as worse treatment outcomes. This study examines the potential predictive role of stimulant urinalysis result at baseline on treatment retention and opioid and stimulant use outcomes amongst individuals initiating MOUD treatment.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This is a cross-sectional secondary analysis of data from a multi-site randomized clinical trial (CTN-0027). A total of 1269 individuals were randomized to receive 24 weeks of buprenorphine (n = 740) or methadone (n = 529) treatment across nine sites. Multiple linear and logistic regressions were conducted to determine the impact of baseline stimulant urinalysis results on treatment retention, and stimulant and opioid use outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Individuals initiating MOUD with a stimulant negative urinalysis result at baseline submitted more negative stimulant (ꞵ=7.8; 95 % CI 6.8–8.7) and opioid (ꞵ=2.8; 95 % CI 1.8–3.8) urinalyses during treatment, were more likely to complete treatment (aOR=1.4; 95 % CI 1.1–1.7), and had better outcomes at six-month follow-up, measured as negative urinalysis for stimulant (aOR=5.3; 95 % CI 3.6–7.7), and opioid (aOR=1.8; 95 % CI 1.3–2.6).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Baseline stimulant use is associated with worse MOUD treatment outcomes, underscoring the need for novel integrated interventions designed to address opioid and stimulant co-use.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72841,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Drug and alcohol dependence reports\",\"volume\":\"15 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100330\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Drug and alcohol dependence reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772724625000137\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drug and alcohol dependence reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772724625000137","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在过去十年中,开始使用阿片类药物使用障碍(mod)药物的个人中非法兴奋剂的使用显着增加。这些物质的共同使用与死亡风险增加以及治疗结果恶化有关。本研究探讨了兴奋剂尿检结果在基线时对治疗保留和阿片类药物和兴奋剂使用结果的潜在预测作用。方法:本研究是对一项多地点随机临床试验(CTN-0027)数据的横断面二次分析。共有1269人在9个地点随机接受24周的丁丙诺啡(n = 740)或美沙酮(n = 529)治疗。进行了多元线性和逻辑回归,以确定基线兴奋剂尿液分析结果对治疗保留、兴奋剂和阿片类药物使用结果的影响。结果在基线尿检结果为兴奋剂阴性的个体初始化mod时提交了更多的阴性兴奋剂(ꞵ=7.8;95% CI 6.8-8.7)和阿片类药物(ꞵ=2.8;95% CI 1.8-3.8)的患者更有可能完成治疗(aOR=1.4;95% CI 1.1-1.7),并且在6个月的随访中有更好的结果,测量为尿检阴性兴奋剂(aOR=5.3;95% CI 3.6-7.7)和阿片类药物(aOR=1.8;95% ci 1.3-2.6)。结论:基线兴奋剂使用与不良的mod治疗结果相关,强调需要设计新的综合干预措施来解决阿片类药物和兴奋剂的共同使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of recent stimulant use on treatment outcomes amongst individuals initiating medications for opioid use disorders: Secondary analysis of a multisite randomized controlled trial

Introduction

Illicit stimulant use among individuals initiating medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD) has significantly increased over the past decade. Co-use of these substances is associated with increased risk of mortality as well as worse treatment outcomes. This study examines the potential predictive role of stimulant urinalysis result at baseline on treatment retention and opioid and stimulant use outcomes amongst individuals initiating MOUD treatment.

Methods

This is a cross-sectional secondary analysis of data from a multi-site randomized clinical trial (CTN-0027). A total of 1269 individuals were randomized to receive 24 weeks of buprenorphine (n = 740) or methadone (n = 529) treatment across nine sites. Multiple linear and logistic regressions were conducted to determine the impact of baseline stimulant urinalysis results on treatment retention, and stimulant and opioid use outcomes.

Results

Individuals initiating MOUD with a stimulant negative urinalysis result at baseline submitted more negative stimulant (ꞵ=7.8; 95 % CI 6.8–8.7) and opioid (ꞵ=2.8; 95 % CI 1.8–3.8) urinalyses during treatment, were more likely to complete treatment (aOR=1.4; 95 % CI 1.1–1.7), and had better outcomes at six-month follow-up, measured as negative urinalysis for stimulant (aOR=5.3; 95 % CI 3.6–7.7), and opioid (aOR=1.8; 95 % CI 1.3–2.6).

Conclusion

Baseline stimulant use is associated with worse MOUD treatment outcomes, underscoring the need for novel integrated interventions designed to address opioid and stimulant co-use.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Drug and alcohol dependence reports
Drug and alcohol dependence reports Psychiatry and Mental Health
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
100 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信