Eden M Barrett , Frederick Cudhea , Erin Washbon , Zoe Levitan , Julia Reedy Sharib , Jeffrey B Blumberg , Renata Micha , Dariush Mozaffarian
{"title":"食品指南针评分-10:利用配料表信息评估食品和饮料健康性的方法验证。","authors":"Eden M Barrett , Frederick Cudhea , Erin Washbon , Zoe Levitan , Julia Reedy Sharib , Jeffrey B Blumberg , Renata Micha , Dariush Mozaffarian","doi":"10.1016/j.ajcnut.2025.03.015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The Food Compass, a novel food profiling system, provides a holistic, validated assessment of the healthfulness of foods, beverages, and meals using 54 attributes across 9 domains. However, information on several of these attributes is not commonly available.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>We aimed to develop and validate an approach, Food Compass Score-10 (FCS-10), to estimate FCSs using information commonly available on package labels.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Missing attributes were calculated using weighted scores of each product’s ingredients, derived from a dataset of ∼10,000 foods and beverages. The final FCS-10 was scaled from 1 (least healthful) to 10 (most healthful). As part of this validation study, diagnostic accuracy analysis was conducted to evaluate the performance of the FCS-10 compared with the original score. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were calculated by comparing the FCS-10 recommendation categorizations with the FCS recommendation categorizations (≥7 for foods to encourage, 4–6 for foods to consume in moderation, ≤3 for foods to limit).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>FCS-10 produced scores within 1 unit of the original score (when rescaled 1–10 for comparison) for 89% of products (<em>n =</em> 481/538); none deviated >2 units. The correlation between FCS-10 and the original score was high (<em>r =</em> 0.93). FCS-10 also performed well in identifying products to encourage, moderate, or limit, with overall sensitivity and specificity of 87% and 93%, respectively.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>FCS-10 offers a practical approach for estimating the healthfulness of diverse packaged foods and beverages using readily available label data while maintaining the strengths of the original system.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50813,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Clinical Nutrition","volume":"121 6","pages":"Pages 1328-1334"},"PeriodicalIF":6.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Food Compass Score-10: validation of a method for evaluating the healthfulness of foods and beverages using ingredient list information\",\"authors\":\"Eden M Barrett , Frederick Cudhea , Erin Washbon , Zoe Levitan , Julia Reedy Sharib , Jeffrey B Blumberg , Renata Micha , Dariush Mozaffarian\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ajcnut.2025.03.015\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The Food Compass, a novel food profiling system, provides a holistic, validated assessment of the healthfulness of foods, beverages, and meals using 54 attributes across 9 domains. However, information on several of these attributes is not commonly available.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>We aimed to develop and validate an approach, Food Compass Score-10 (FCS-10), to estimate FCSs using information commonly available on package labels.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Missing attributes were calculated using weighted scores of each product’s ingredients, derived from a dataset of ∼10,000 foods and beverages. The final FCS-10 was scaled from 1 (least healthful) to 10 (most healthful). As part of this validation study, diagnostic accuracy analysis was conducted to evaluate the performance of the FCS-10 compared with the original score. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were calculated by comparing the FCS-10 recommendation categorizations with the FCS recommendation categorizations (≥7 for foods to encourage, 4–6 for foods to consume in moderation, ≤3 for foods to limit).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>FCS-10 produced scores within 1 unit of the original score (when rescaled 1–10 for comparison) for 89% of products (<em>n =</em> 481/538); none deviated >2 units. The correlation between FCS-10 and the original score was high (<em>r =</em> 0.93). FCS-10 also performed well in identifying products to encourage, moderate, or limit, with overall sensitivity and specificity of 87% and 93%, respectively.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>FCS-10 offers a practical approach for estimating the healthfulness of diverse packaged foods and beverages using readily available label data while maintaining the strengths of the original system.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50813,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Clinical Nutrition\",\"volume\":\"121 6\",\"pages\":\"Pages 1328-1334\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Clinical Nutrition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002916525001431\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NUTRITION & DIETETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Clinical Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002916525001431","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Food Compass Score-10: validation of a method for evaluating the healthfulness of foods and beverages using ingredient list information
Background
The Food Compass, a novel food profiling system, provides a holistic, validated assessment of the healthfulness of foods, beverages, and meals using 54 attributes across 9 domains. However, information on several of these attributes is not commonly available.
Objectives
We aimed to develop and validate an approach, Food Compass Score-10 (FCS-10), to estimate FCSs using information commonly available on package labels.
Methods
Missing attributes were calculated using weighted scores of each product’s ingredients, derived from a dataset of ∼10,000 foods and beverages. The final FCS-10 was scaled from 1 (least healthful) to 10 (most healthful). As part of this validation study, diagnostic accuracy analysis was conducted to evaluate the performance of the FCS-10 compared with the original score. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were calculated by comparing the FCS-10 recommendation categorizations with the FCS recommendation categorizations (≥7 for foods to encourage, 4–6 for foods to consume in moderation, ≤3 for foods to limit).
Results
FCS-10 produced scores within 1 unit of the original score (when rescaled 1–10 for comparison) for 89% of products (n = 481/538); none deviated >2 units. The correlation between FCS-10 and the original score was high (r = 0.93). FCS-10 also performed well in identifying products to encourage, moderate, or limit, with overall sensitivity and specificity of 87% and 93%, respectively.
Conclusions
FCS-10 offers a practical approach for estimating the healthfulness of diverse packaged foods and beverages using readily available label data while maintaining the strengths of the original system.
期刊介绍:
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition is recognized as the most highly rated peer-reviewed, primary research journal in nutrition and dietetics.It focuses on publishing the latest research on various topics in nutrition, including but not limited to obesity, vitamins and minerals, nutrition and disease, and energy metabolism.
Purpose:
The purpose of AJCN is to:
Publish original research studies relevant to human and clinical nutrition.
Consider well-controlled clinical studies describing scientific mechanisms, efficacy, and safety of dietary interventions in the context of disease prevention or health benefits.
Encourage public health and epidemiologic studies relevant to human nutrition.
Promote innovative investigations of nutritional questions employing epigenetic, genomic, proteomic, and metabolomic approaches.
Include solicited editorials, book reviews, solicited or unsolicited review articles, invited controversy position papers, and letters to the Editor related to prior AJCN articles.
Peer Review Process:
All submitted material with scientific content undergoes peer review by the Editors or their designees before acceptance for publication.