{"title":"清洁矫正器与固定正畸治疗中近端龋形成及龋坏、缺牙、补牙评分的比较研究。","authors":"Semanur Çetin, Berat Serdar Akdeniz","doi":"10.4274/TurkJOrthod.2024.2023.140","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate proximal caries formation and Decay, Missing, Filled Teeth (DMFT) scores during clear aligner (CA) therapy compared with fixed orthodontic treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 50 patients with a mean age of 19.9 years were divided into two equal groups (n=25) according to treatment method. Both CA and fixed appliance (FA) patients had low-to-medium levels of crowding. Caries formation and DMFT scores were assessed via radiographic and clinical examination before treatment (T0) and at the end of a six-month observation period (T1). The numbers of caries lesions and fillings was analyzed using a Two-Way Analysis of Variance with a significance level of 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significant statistical differences were found for both groups (p<0.001). The amount of proximal caries significantly increased in both groups, whereas the increase in non-proximal caries was only statistically significant in the FA group. DMFT scores also increased significantly in both groups, with the FA group showing a higher increase at the end of the observation period.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although CAs had an advantage in decreasing the overall risk of caries, no distinct advantage was found in reducing the risk of proximal caries lesions. The DMFT index was significantly higher in fixed orthodontic treatment patients than in CA treatment patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":37013,"journal":{"name":"Turkish Journal of Orthodontics","volume":"38 1","pages":"30-35"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Study of Proximal Caries Formation and Decay, Missing, Filled Teeth Scores in Clear Aligners and Fixed Orthodontic Treatments.\",\"authors\":\"Semanur Çetin, Berat Serdar Akdeniz\",\"doi\":\"10.4274/TurkJOrthod.2024.2023.140\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate proximal caries formation and Decay, Missing, Filled Teeth (DMFT) scores during clear aligner (CA) therapy compared with fixed orthodontic treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 50 patients with a mean age of 19.9 years were divided into two equal groups (n=25) according to treatment method. Both CA and fixed appliance (FA) patients had low-to-medium levels of crowding. Caries formation and DMFT scores were assessed via radiographic and clinical examination before treatment (T0) and at the end of a six-month observation period (T1). The numbers of caries lesions and fillings was analyzed using a Two-Way Analysis of Variance with a significance level of 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significant statistical differences were found for both groups (p<0.001). The amount of proximal caries significantly increased in both groups, whereas the increase in non-proximal caries was only statistically significant in the FA group. DMFT scores also increased significantly in both groups, with the FA group showing a higher increase at the end of the observation period.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although CAs had an advantage in decreasing the overall risk of caries, no distinct advantage was found in reducing the risk of proximal caries lesions. The DMFT index was significantly higher in fixed orthodontic treatment patients than in CA treatment patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37013,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Turkish Journal of Orthodontics\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"30-35\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Turkish Journal of Orthodontics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4274/TurkJOrthod.2024.2023.140\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish Journal of Orthodontics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4274/TurkJOrthod.2024.2023.140","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:本研究旨在评估透明矫正器(CA)治疗与固定正畸治疗期间近端龋形成和龋缺补(DMFT)评分。方法:50例患者,平均年龄19.9岁,按治疗方法分为两组(n=25)。CA和固定矫治器(FA)患者均有低至中等程度的拥挤。在治疗前(T0)和6个月观察期结束时(T1),通过x线摄影和临床检查评估龋形成和DMFT评分。采用双向方差分析(Two-Way Analysis of Variance)分析龋损数和填充物数,显著性水平为0.05。结果:两组比较差异有统计学意义(p)。结论:虽然ca在降低整体龋病风险上有优势,但在降低近端龋病风险上无明显优势。固定正畸治疗组DMFT指数明显高于CA治疗组。
Comparative Study of Proximal Caries Formation and Decay, Missing, Filled Teeth Scores in Clear Aligners and Fixed Orthodontic Treatments.
Objective: This study aimed to evaluate proximal caries formation and Decay, Missing, Filled Teeth (DMFT) scores during clear aligner (CA) therapy compared with fixed orthodontic treatment.
Methods: A total of 50 patients with a mean age of 19.9 years were divided into two equal groups (n=25) according to treatment method. Both CA and fixed appliance (FA) patients had low-to-medium levels of crowding. Caries formation and DMFT scores were assessed via radiographic and clinical examination before treatment (T0) and at the end of a six-month observation period (T1). The numbers of caries lesions and fillings was analyzed using a Two-Way Analysis of Variance with a significance level of 0.05.
Results: Significant statistical differences were found for both groups (p<0.001). The amount of proximal caries significantly increased in both groups, whereas the increase in non-proximal caries was only statistically significant in the FA group. DMFT scores also increased significantly in both groups, with the FA group showing a higher increase at the end of the observation period.
Conclusion: Although CAs had an advantage in decreasing the overall risk of caries, no distinct advantage was found in reducing the risk of proximal caries lesions. The DMFT index was significantly higher in fixed orthodontic treatment patients than in CA treatment patients.