新型手持式机器人取针器与传统器械在腹腔镜输尿管取石术中的有效性和安全性:一项多中心、随机、单盲、阳性平行对照、非劣效性临床试验。

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Zhiyong Wen, Yonglian Guo, Ziqiang Dong, Kun Yang, Xinghuan Wang
{"title":"新型手持式机器人取针器与传统器械在腹腔镜输尿管取石术中的有效性和安全性:一项多中心、随机、单盲、阳性平行对照、非劣效性临床试验。","authors":"Zhiyong Wen, Yonglian Guo, Ziqiang Dong, Kun Yang, Xinghuan Wang","doi":"10.1089/lap.2024.0394","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Purpose:</i></b> This study aimed to validate the efficacy and safety of the HTH-1 handheld robotic needle holder versus conventional instrument in laparoscopic ureterolithotomy. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> This is a noninferiority clinical trial conducted in three hospitals. Patients were enrolled and randomly allocated into the experimental or control group on whom laparoscopic ureterolithotomy was performed with the ureteral incision sutured using the HTH-1 and conventional needle holder, respectively. The average suture time per stitch (STPS) of ureter was calculated as the primary efficacy indicator. Postoperative drainage volumes were recorded, and the instruments' operating performance was subjectively evaluated and compared between groups. Adverse events occurred during the trial and interference of the instruments to the monitor were assessed as the safety indicators. <b><i>Results:</i></b> From April to September 2018, 50 patients were enrolled with 25 ones in each group. For the efficacy indicators, the noninferiority of the STPS was determined when the noninferiority margin was 40 seconds. The postoperative drainage volumes were not significantly different between groups. The instruments' operating performance was rated as smooth in all cases of both groups. For the safety indicators, no adverse events or interference of the instruments to the monitor occurred during surgery in any case. Clavien 1 complications occurred in 7 (4 in the experimental group versus 3 in the control group, <i>P</i> = 1.000) patients after surgery. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> The HTH-1 is effective and safe and noninferior to conventional needle holder in laparoscopic ureterolithotomy. Adequate training and skills assessment are needed before application on patients. <b><i>Clinical trial registration:</i></b> The clinical trial registration was completed in Jiangsu Provincial Drug Administration (record number: Suxielinbei 20180018).</p>","PeriodicalId":50166,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy and Safety of a Novel Handheld Robotic Needle Holder Versus Conventional Instrument in Laparoscopic Ureterolithotomy: A Multicenter, Randomized, Single-Blind, Positive Parallel Controlled, and Noninferiority Clinical Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Zhiyong Wen, Yonglian Guo, Ziqiang Dong, Kun Yang, Xinghuan Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/lap.2024.0394\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b><i>Purpose:</i></b> This study aimed to validate the efficacy and safety of the HTH-1 handheld robotic needle holder versus conventional instrument in laparoscopic ureterolithotomy. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> This is a noninferiority clinical trial conducted in three hospitals. Patients were enrolled and randomly allocated into the experimental or control group on whom laparoscopic ureterolithotomy was performed with the ureteral incision sutured using the HTH-1 and conventional needle holder, respectively. The average suture time per stitch (STPS) of ureter was calculated as the primary efficacy indicator. Postoperative drainage volumes were recorded, and the instruments' operating performance was subjectively evaluated and compared between groups. Adverse events occurred during the trial and interference of the instruments to the monitor were assessed as the safety indicators. <b><i>Results:</i></b> From April to September 2018, 50 patients were enrolled with 25 ones in each group. For the efficacy indicators, the noninferiority of the STPS was determined when the noninferiority margin was 40 seconds. The postoperative drainage volumes were not significantly different between groups. The instruments' operating performance was rated as smooth in all cases of both groups. For the safety indicators, no adverse events or interference of the instruments to the monitor occurred during surgery in any case. Clavien 1 complications occurred in 7 (4 in the experimental group versus 3 in the control group, <i>P</i> = 1.000) patients after surgery. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> The HTH-1 is effective and safe and noninferior to conventional needle holder in laparoscopic ureterolithotomy. Adequate training and skills assessment are needed before application on patients. <b><i>Clinical trial registration:</i></b> The clinical trial registration was completed in Jiangsu Provincial Drug Administration (record number: Suxielinbei 20180018).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50166,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2024.0394\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2024.0394","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在验证HTH-1手持式机器人持针器与常规器械在腹腔镜输尿管取石术中的有效性和安全性。方法:在三家医院进行非劣效性临床试验。将患者随机分为实验组和对照组,实验组和对照组分别采用HTH-1和常规持针器缝合输尿管切口,行腹腔镜输尿管取石术。以输尿管平均每针缝合时间(STPS)作为主要疗效指标。记录术后引流量,主观评价两组器械的操作性能并进行比较。试验过程中发生的不良事件和仪器对监测器的干扰作为安全指标进行评估。结果:2018年4 - 9月共入组患者50例,每组25例。对于疗效指标,当非劣效裕度为40秒时,确定STPS的非劣效性。两组术后引流量差异无统计学意义。在两组病例中,仪器的操作性能均被评为平稳。在安全性指标方面,在任何情况下手术过程中均未发生器械对监护仪的不良事件或干扰。术后发生Clavien 1并发症7例(实验组4例,对照组3例,P = 1.000)。结论:HTH-1在腹腔镜输尿管取石术中有效、安全,且不逊色于传统取石针器。在应用于患者之前,需要进行充分的培训和技能评估。临床试验注册:在江苏省药品监督管理局完成临床试验注册(备案号:Suxielinbei 20180018)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Efficacy and Safety of a Novel Handheld Robotic Needle Holder Versus Conventional Instrument in Laparoscopic Ureterolithotomy: A Multicenter, Randomized, Single-Blind, Positive Parallel Controlled, and Noninferiority Clinical Trial.

Purpose: This study aimed to validate the efficacy and safety of the HTH-1 handheld robotic needle holder versus conventional instrument in laparoscopic ureterolithotomy. Methods: This is a noninferiority clinical trial conducted in three hospitals. Patients were enrolled and randomly allocated into the experimental or control group on whom laparoscopic ureterolithotomy was performed with the ureteral incision sutured using the HTH-1 and conventional needle holder, respectively. The average suture time per stitch (STPS) of ureter was calculated as the primary efficacy indicator. Postoperative drainage volumes were recorded, and the instruments' operating performance was subjectively evaluated and compared between groups. Adverse events occurred during the trial and interference of the instruments to the monitor were assessed as the safety indicators. Results: From April to September 2018, 50 patients were enrolled with 25 ones in each group. For the efficacy indicators, the noninferiority of the STPS was determined when the noninferiority margin was 40 seconds. The postoperative drainage volumes were not significantly different between groups. The instruments' operating performance was rated as smooth in all cases of both groups. For the safety indicators, no adverse events or interference of the instruments to the monitor occurred during surgery in any case. Clavien 1 complications occurred in 7 (4 in the experimental group versus 3 in the control group, P = 1.000) patients after surgery. Conclusions: The HTH-1 is effective and safe and noninferior to conventional needle holder in laparoscopic ureterolithotomy. Adequate training and skills assessment are needed before application on patients. Clinical trial registration: The clinical trial registration was completed in Jiangsu Provincial Drug Administration (record number: Suxielinbei 20180018).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
163
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques (JLAST) is the leading international peer-reviewed journal for practicing surgeons who want to keep up with the latest thinking and advanced surgical technologies in laparoscopy, endoscopy, NOTES, and robotics. The Journal is ideally suited to surgeons who are early adopters of new technology and techniques. Recognizing that many new technologies and techniques have significant overlap with several surgical specialties, JLAST is the first journal to focus on these topics both in general and pediatric surgery, and includes other surgical subspecialties such as: urology, gynecologic surgery, thoracic surgery, and more.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信