词语感知和上下视野不对称

IF 2.2 3区 心理学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES
Deborah J. Serrien, Louise O’Regan
{"title":"词语感知和上下视野不对称","authors":"Deborah J. Serrien,&nbsp;Louise O’Regan","doi":"10.1016/j.bandc.2025.106294","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Left-hemispheric lateralisation generally associates with superiority of language processing, facilitated by specialist representational and attentional influences, albeit characterised by individual differences due to handedness. In this research, we examine perceptual processing of linguistic input in left- and right-handers, and assess lateral asymmetries in the vertical dimension that is embedded within upper-lower visual fields. We use a behavioural design with presentation of bilateral stimuli (upper or lower) visual field locations during match and mismatch conditions. The data revealed that both groups were more successful in the upper than lower visual field. However, left- as compared to right-handers demonstrated increased processing in these locations, indicating beneficial effects that point to stronger perceptual responsiveness. The observations are indicative of intrinsic cross-hemispheric biases as well as acquired patterns due to perceptuo-motor experiences. In addition, hand and eye preference facilitated responses in bilateral upper visual field locations. The findings propose intricate connections between manual and attentional control with perceptual asymmetries that are steered by dedicated mechanisms. In conclusion, the data illustrate that hand and eye preference act as mediators that guide responding to visual input within the environment.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55331,"journal":{"name":"Brain and Cognition","volume":"186 ","pages":"Article 106294"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Word perception and upper-lower visual field asymmetries\",\"authors\":\"Deborah J. Serrien,&nbsp;Louise O’Regan\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.bandc.2025.106294\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Left-hemispheric lateralisation generally associates with superiority of language processing, facilitated by specialist representational and attentional influences, albeit characterised by individual differences due to handedness. In this research, we examine perceptual processing of linguistic input in left- and right-handers, and assess lateral asymmetries in the vertical dimension that is embedded within upper-lower visual fields. We use a behavioural design with presentation of bilateral stimuli (upper or lower) visual field locations during match and mismatch conditions. The data revealed that both groups were more successful in the upper than lower visual field. However, left- as compared to right-handers demonstrated increased processing in these locations, indicating beneficial effects that point to stronger perceptual responsiveness. The observations are indicative of intrinsic cross-hemispheric biases as well as acquired patterns due to perceptuo-motor experiences. In addition, hand and eye preference facilitated responses in bilateral upper visual field locations. The findings propose intricate connections between manual and attentional control with perceptual asymmetries that are steered by dedicated mechanisms. In conclusion, the data illustrate that hand and eye preference act as mediators that guide responding to visual input within the environment.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55331,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brain and Cognition\",\"volume\":\"186 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106294\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brain and Cognition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S027826262500034X\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain and Cognition","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S027826262500034X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

左半球偏侧化通常与语言处理的优势有关,由专业的代表性和注意力影响促进,尽管由于利手性而存在个体差异。在这项研究中,我们研究了左撇子和右撇子对语言输入的感知处理,并评估了上下视野中嵌入的垂直维度的横向不对称。我们使用了一种行为设计,在匹配和不匹配条件下呈现双侧刺激(上或下)视野位置。数据显示,两组人的上视野比下视野更成功。然而,与右撇子相比,左撇子在这些部位的处理能力有所增加,这表明有利的影响指向更强的感知反应。这些观察结果表明了内在的跨半球偏差以及由于感知运动经验而获得的模式。此外,手和眼偏好促进了双侧上视野位置的反应。研究结果表明,手工和注意力控制与知觉不对称之间存在复杂的联系,知觉不对称是由专门的机制控制的。总之,这些数据表明,手和眼睛的偏好作为媒介,指导在环境中对视觉输入的反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Word perception and upper-lower visual field asymmetries
Left-hemispheric lateralisation generally associates with superiority of language processing, facilitated by specialist representational and attentional influences, albeit characterised by individual differences due to handedness. In this research, we examine perceptual processing of linguistic input in left- and right-handers, and assess lateral asymmetries in the vertical dimension that is embedded within upper-lower visual fields. We use a behavioural design with presentation of bilateral stimuli (upper or lower) visual field locations during match and mismatch conditions. The data revealed that both groups were more successful in the upper than lower visual field. However, left- as compared to right-handers demonstrated increased processing in these locations, indicating beneficial effects that point to stronger perceptual responsiveness. The observations are indicative of intrinsic cross-hemispheric biases as well as acquired patterns due to perceptuo-motor experiences. In addition, hand and eye preference facilitated responses in bilateral upper visual field locations. The findings propose intricate connections between manual and attentional control with perceptual asymmetries that are steered by dedicated mechanisms. In conclusion, the data illustrate that hand and eye preference act as mediators that guide responding to visual input within the environment.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Brain and Cognition
Brain and Cognition 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Brain and Cognition is a forum for the integration of the neurosciences and cognitive sciences. B&C publishes peer-reviewed research articles, theoretical papers, case histories that address important theoretical issues, and historical articles into the interaction between cognitive function and brain processes. The focus is on rigorous studies of an empirical or theoretical nature and which make an original contribution to our knowledge about the involvement of the nervous system in cognition. Coverage includes, but is not limited to memory, learning, emotion, perception, movement, music or praxis in relationship to brain structure or function. Published articles will typically address issues relating some aspect of cognitive function to its neurological substrates with clear theoretical import, formulating new hypotheses or refuting previously established hypotheses. Clinical papers are welcome if they raise issues of theoretical importance or concern and shed light on the interaction between brain function and cognitive function. We welcome review articles that clearly contribute a new perspective or integration, beyond summarizing the literature in the field; authors of review articles should make explicit where the contribution lies. We also welcome proposals for special issues on aspects of the relation between cognition and the structure and function of the nervous system. Such proposals can be made directly to the Editor-in-Chief from individuals interested in being guest editors for such collections.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信