{"title":"Trump 2.0—a backwards step for women’s sexual and reproductive rights","authors":"John Oldroyd, Nancy Shresta, Alison Hughes","doi":"10.1136/bmj.r550","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Buse and McKee discuss the potential changes to global health directions, funding, and structures under a second Trump administration.1 They note the risk to funding of organisations supporting sexual and reproductive health rights. These include the reinstatement of such policies as the “global gag rule,” in which the US government refuses to fund global non-government organisations who provide, refer, or …","PeriodicalId":22388,"journal":{"name":"The BMJ","volume":"86 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The BMJ","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.r550","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Trump 2.0—a backwards step for women’s sexual and reproductive rights
Buse and McKee discuss the potential changes to global health directions, funding, and structures under a second Trump administration.1 They note the risk to funding of organisations supporting sexual and reproductive health rights. These include the reinstatement of such policies as the “global gag rule,” in which the US government refuses to fund global non-government organisations who provide, refer, or …
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
