土耳其版伙伴健康量表的心理测量特性:初级卫生保健中的慢性病自我管理。

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING
Julide Gulizar Yildirim, Sharon Lawn
{"title":"土耳其版伙伴健康量表的心理测量特性:初级卫生保健中的慢性病自我管理。","authors":"Julide Gulizar Yildirim,&nbsp;Sharon Lawn","doi":"10.1111/ijn.70007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>This study aimed to assess the psychometric properties of the Turkish version of the Partners in Health Scale (PIH-TR), which was developed to assess the perceptions of patients with chronic conditions in primary care. Accurate assessment of facilitators and barriers to self-management of chronic conditions, from the patients' perspective, is important for working effectively with them to promote better health outcomes.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A cross-sectional validation study was conducted and designed according to the STROBE guidelines. One hundred thirty-six patients, aged 30–90 years (86.7% aged &gt; 60), were recruited from family care centres. Data were collected using the revised PIH, an adapted version of Model-2 (PIH-TR), which is a 12-item self-rated measure of self-management of chronic conditions. The PIH was translated into Turkish using Beaton et al.'s method. Content, construct validity and internal consistency analyses were undertaken to evaluate the data.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The PIH-TR had satisfactory reliability and validity and revealed a four-factor structure appropriate to the original scale: knowledge, partnership in treatment, recognition and management of symptoms and coping. Omega coefficient (0.860), test–retest reliability (0.841) and comparative fit indices (CFI) (0.99) were high.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The PIH-TR has good specifics and is reliable and valid as an objective self-rated tool to assess self-management of Turkish patients' chronic conditions.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":14223,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Nursing Practice","volume":"31 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11926289/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Psychometric Properties of the Turkish Version of the Partners in Health Scale: Chronic Disease Self-Management in Primary Healthcare\",\"authors\":\"Julide Gulizar Yildirim,&nbsp;Sharon Lawn\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ijn.70007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>This study aimed to assess the psychometric properties of the Turkish version of the Partners in Health Scale (PIH-TR), which was developed to assess the perceptions of patients with chronic conditions in primary care. Accurate assessment of facilitators and barriers to self-management of chronic conditions, from the patients' perspective, is important for working effectively with them to promote better health outcomes.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>A cross-sectional validation study was conducted and designed according to the STROBE guidelines. One hundred thirty-six patients, aged 30–90 years (86.7% aged &gt; 60), were recruited from family care centres. Data were collected using the revised PIH, an adapted version of Model-2 (PIH-TR), which is a 12-item self-rated measure of self-management of chronic conditions. The PIH was translated into Turkish using Beaton et al.'s method. Content, construct validity and internal consistency analyses were undertaken to evaluate the data.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>The PIH-TR had satisfactory reliability and validity and revealed a four-factor structure appropriate to the original scale: knowledge, partnership in treatment, recognition and management of symptoms and coping. Omega coefficient (0.860), test–retest reliability (0.841) and comparative fit indices (CFI) (0.99) were high.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>The PIH-TR has good specifics and is reliable and valid as an objective self-rated tool to assess self-management of Turkish patients' chronic conditions.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14223,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Nursing Practice\",\"volume\":\"31 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11926289/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Nursing Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijn.70007\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Nursing Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijn.70007","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:本研究旨在评估土耳其版健康伙伴量表(PIH-TR)的心理测量特性,该量表旨在评估初级保健中慢性病患者的认知。从患者的角度准确评估慢性病自我管理的促进因素和障碍,对于与他们有效合作以促进更好的健康结果非常重要。方法:根据STROBE指南进行横断面验证研究。从家庭护理中心招募了136名年龄在30-90岁之间的患者(86.7%的患者年龄在60岁至60岁之间)。数据收集使用修订后的PIH,这是模型2 (PIH- tr)的改编版本,这是一个12项慢性疾病自我管理的自评测量。使用Beaton等人的方法将PIH翻译成土耳其语。对数据进行内容分析、结构效度分析和内部一致性分析。结果:PIH-TR具有满意的信效度,呈现出与原量表相适应的四因素结构:知识、治疗伙伴、症状的识别与管理、应对。Omega系数(0.860)、重测信度(0.841)、比较拟合指数(CFI)(0.99)均较高。结论:PIH-TR具有良好的特异性,作为评估土耳其慢性疾病患者自我管理的客观自评工具是可靠有效的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Psychometric Properties of the Turkish Version of the Partners in Health Scale: Chronic Disease Self-Management in Primary Healthcare

Psychometric Properties of the Turkish Version of the Partners in Health Scale: Chronic Disease Self-Management in Primary Healthcare

Background

This study aimed to assess the psychometric properties of the Turkish version of the Partners in Health Scale (PIH-TR), which was developed to assess the perceptions of patients with chronic conditions in primary care. Accurate assessment of facilitators and barriers to self-management of chronic conditions, from the patients' perspective, is important for working effectively with them to promote better health outcomes.

Methods

A cross-sectional validation study was conducted and designed according to the STROBE guidelines. One hundred thirty-six patients, aged 30–90 years (86.7% aged > 60), were recruited from family care centres. Data were collected using the revised PIH, an adapted version of Model-2 (PIH-TR), which is a 12-item self-rated measure of self-management of chronic conditions. The PIH was translated into Turkish using Beaton et al.'s method. Content, construct validity and internal consistency analyses were undertaken to evaluate the data.

Results

The PIH-TR had satisfactory reliability and validity and revealed a four-factor structure appropriate to the original scale: knowledge, partnership in treatment, recognition and management of symptoms and coping. Omega coefficient (0.860), test–retest reliability (0.841) and comparative fit indices (CFI) (0.99) were high.

Conclusion

The PIH-TR has good specifics and is reliable and valid as an objective self-rated tool to assess self-management of Turkish patients' chronic conditions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
85
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: International Journal of Nursing Practice is a fully refereed journal that publishes original scholarly work that advances the international understanding and development of nursing, both as a profession and as an academic discipline. The Journal focuses on research papers and professional discussion papers that have a sound scientific, theoretical or philosophical base. Preference is given to high-quality papers written in a way that renders them accessible to a wide audience without compromising quality. The primary criteria for acceptance are excellence, relevance and clarity. All articles are peer-reviewed by at least two researchers expert in the field of the submitted paper.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信