离散事件模拟模型在COPD管理中的应用:系统综述。

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Liu Shuai, Chunni Zhou, Jinyi Zhou, Hao Hu, Yunfeng Lai, Lijun Fan, Wei Du, Meng Li
{"title":"离散事件模拟模型在COPD管理中的应用:系统综述。","authors":"Liu Shuai, Chunni Zhou, Jinyi Zhou, Hao Hu, Yunfeng Lai, Lijun Fan, Wei Du, Meng Li","doi":"10.2147/COPD.S501054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This systematic review aims to comprehensively assess the current application of discrete event simulation (DES) models in managing chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). By synthesizing and analyzing multiple studies, we incorporate the latest evidence, evaluate research quality, identify gaps, and provide recommendations for the future application of DES in COPD management.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We systematically searched six electronic databases including PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane, Econlit, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) for articles published up to August 22, 2024. Reference lists of the included articles were also manually checked. Depending on the study type, we assessed quality using either the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) 2022 checklist or the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR) Practice Guidelines.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of the 273 records identified, nine studies met the inclusion criteria. All of these studies focused on health economic evaluations using DES in COPD management, and were conducted in high-income countries. The studies were divided into three groups based on the modeling systems they used: cost-effectiveness analyses of different pharmacological treatments (n=3), economic evaluations of case detection strategies (n=3), and assessments of various interventions on COPD healthcare services (n=3). All studies reported model validation methods (n=9); however, only two studies performed subgroup analysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This review highlights the current use of DES in COPD management and suggests avenues for future research and resource allocation to enhance the effectiveness of COPD interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":48818,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease","volume":"20 ","pages":"685-698"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11910922/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Application of Discrete Event Simulation Models for COPD Management: A Systematic Review.\",\"authors\":\"Liu Shuai, Chunni Zhou, Jinyi Zhou, Hao Hu, Yunfeng Lai, Lijun Fan, Wei Du, Meng Li\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/COPD.S501054\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This systematic review aims to comprehensively assess the current application of discrete event simulation (DES) models in managing chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). By synthesizing and analyzing multiple studies, we incorporate the latest evidence, evaluate research quality, identify gaps, and provide recommendations for the future application of DES in COPD management.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We systematically searched six electronic databases including PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane, Econlit, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) for articles published up to August 22, 2024. Reference lists of the included articles were also manually checked. Depending on the study type, we assessed quality using either the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) 2022 checklist or the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR) Practice Guidelines.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of the 273 records identified, nine studies met the inclusion criteria. All of these studies focused on health economic evaluations using DES in COPD management, and were conducted in high-income countries. The studies were divided into three groups based on the modeling systems they used: cost-effectiveness analyses of different pharmacological treatments (n=3), economic evaluations of case detection strategies (n=3), and assessments of various interventions on COPD healthcare services (n=3). All studies reported model validation methods (n=9); however, only two studies performed subgroup analysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This review highlights the current use of DES in COPD management and suggests avenues for future research and resource allocation to enhance the effectiveness of COPD interventions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48818,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease\",\"volume\":\"20 \",\"pages\":\"685-698\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11910922/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S501054\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S501054","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:本系统综述旨在全面评估离散事件模拟(DES)模型在慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)治疗中的应用现状。通过综合和分析多项研究,我们纳入最新证据,评估研究质量,找出差距,并为DES在COPD治疗中的未来应用提供建议。方法:系统检索PubMed、Web of Science、Embase、Cochrane、Econlit、CNKI等6个电子数据库,检索截止到2024年8月22日发表的文章。所包含文章的参考列表也被手工检查。根据研究类型,我们使用综合卫生经济评估报告标准(CHEERS) 2022清单或国际药物经济学与结果研究学会(ISPOR)实践指南来评估质量。结果:在273份文献中,有9项研究符合纳入标准。所有这些研究都集中在高收入国家使用DES进行COPD管理的健康经济评估。这些研究根据他们使用的建模系统分为三组:不同药物治疗的成本效益分析(n=3),病例检测策略的经济评估(n=3),以及对COPD医疗服务的各种干预措施的评估(n=3)。所有研究报告了模型验证方法(n=9);然而,只有两项研究进行了亚组分析。结论:本综述强调了目前DES在COPD治疗中的应用,并提出了未来研究和资源分配的途径,以提高COPD干预措施的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Application of Discrete Event Simulation Models for COPD Management: A Systematic Review.

Background: This systematic review aims to comprehensively assess the current application of discrete event simulation (DES) models in managing chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). By synthesizing and analyzing multiple studies, we incorporate the latest evidence, evaluate research quality, identify gaps, and provide recommendations for the future application of DES in COPD management.

Methods: We systematically searched six electronic databases including PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane, Econlit, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) for articles published up to August 22, 2024. Reference lists of the included articles were also manually checked. Depending on the study type, we assessed quality using either the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) 2022 checklist or the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR) Practice Guidelines.

Results: Out of the 273 records identified, nine studies met the inclusion criteria. All of these studies focused on health economic evaluations using DES in COPD management, and were conducted in high-income countries. The studies were divided into three groups based on the modeling systems they used: cost-effectiveness analyses of different pharmacological treatments (n=3), economic evaluations of case detection strategies (n=3), and assessments of various interventions on COPD healthcare services (n=3). All studies reported model validation methods (n=9); however, only two studies performed subgroup analysis.

Conclusion: This review highlights the current use of DES in COPD management and suggests avenues for future research and resource allocation to enhance the effectiveness of COPD interventions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
10.70%
发文量
372
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: An international, peer-reviewed journal of therapeutics and pharmacology focusing on concise rapid reporting of clinical studies and reviews in COPD. Special focus will be given to the pathophysiological processes underlying the disease, intervention programs, patient focused education, and self management protocols. This journal is directed at specialists and healthcare professionals
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信