欧洲10年的营养评分包装前营养标签

IF 23.6 Q1 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Chantal Julia, Nikhil Gokani, Serge Hercberg, Amandine Garde
{"title":"欧洲10年的营养评分包装前营养标签","authors":"Chantal Julia, Nikhil Gokani, Serge Hercberg, Amandine Garde","doi":"10.1038/s43016-025-01141-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recognizing front-of-pack nutrition labelling (FOPL) as an important tool for promoting healthier diets, the European Commission announced in 2020 that it would propose legislation for mandatory, harmonized FOPL as of 2022. Among existing FOPL schemes that could be used to that end, Nutri-Score (a summary, colour-coded system) stands out as the most widely adopted since 2017, with studies documenting its effectiveness in various contexts. Here we argue that stakeholders with conflicts of interest used contestable lobbying tactics and instrumentalized evidence against Nutri-Score, contributing to the European Commission’s failure to propose legislation. We call for an EU–wide FOPL scheme to be chosen on the basis of evidence-based, transparent policy processes that readdress power imbalances and create the trust required for genuine democratic debate. Front-of-pack nutrition labelling is increasingly adopted as a tool to promote healthier diets. This paper reviews major front-of-pack labelling schemes in the EU with a focus on Nutri-Score, offering a critical assessment of the policy process led by the European Commission on the topic and underscoring the need for it to be more transparent and evidence-based.","PeriodicalId":94151,"journal":{"name":"Nature food","volume":"6 3","pages":"239-243"},"PeriodicalIF":23.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ten years of Nutri-Score front-of-pack nutrition labelling in Europe\",\"authors\":\"Chantal Julia, Nikhil Gokani, Serge Hercberg, Amandine Garde\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s43016-025-01141-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Recognizing front-of-pack nutrition labelling (FOPL) as an important tool for promoting healthier diets, the European Commission announced in 2020 that it would propose legislation for mandatory, harmonized FOPL as of 2022. Among existing FOPL schemes that could be used to that end, Nutri-Score (a summary, colour-coded system) stands out as the most widely adopted since 2017, with studies documenting its effectiveness in various contexts. Here we argue that stakeholders with conflicts of interest used contestable lobbying tactics and instrumentalized evidence against Nutri-Score, contributing to the European Commission’s failure to propose legislation. We call for an EU–wide FOPL scheme to be chosen on the basis of evidence-based, transparent policy processes that readdress power imbalances and create the trust required for genuine democratic debate. Front-of-pack nutrition labelling is increasingly adopted as a tool to promote healthier diets. This paper reviews major front-of-pack labelling schemes in the EU with a focus on Nutri-Score, offering a critical assessment of the policy process led by the European Commission on the topic and underscoring the need for it to be more transparent and evidence-based.\",\"PeriodicalId\":94151,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nature food\",\"volume\":\"6 3\",\"pages\":\"239-243\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":23.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nature food\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.nature.com/articles/s43016-025-01141-y\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature food","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s43016-025-01141-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

欧盟委员会认识到包装正面营养标签(FOPL)是促进更健康饮食的重要工具,并于2020年宣布,将在2022年提出强制性、统一的FOPL立法。在现有可用于实现这一目标的FOPL方案中,nutrition - score(一种摘要、颜色编码系统)是自2017年以来采用最广泛的方案,研究记录了其在各种情况下的有效性。在这里,我们认为利益冲突的利益相关者使用了有争议的游说策略和工具化的证据来反对nutrition - score,导致欧盟委员会未能提出立法。我们呼吁在以证据为基础、透明的政策程序的基础上,选择一个全欧盟范围的FOPL计划,以纠正权力不平衡,并为真正的民主辩论创造所需的信任。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Ten years of Nutri-Score front-of-pack nutrition labelling in Europe

Ten years of Nutri-Score front-of-pack nutrition labelling in Europe
Recognizing front-of-pack nutrition labelling (FOPL) as an important tool for promoting healthier diets, the European Commission announced in 2020 that it would propose legislation for mandatory, harmonized FOPL as of 2022. Among existing FOPL schemes that could be used to that end, Nutri-Score (a summary, colour-coded system) stands out as the most widely adopted since 2017, with studies documenting its effectiveness in various contexts. Here we argue that stakeholders with conflicts of interest used contestable lobbying tactics and instrumentalized evidence against Nutri-Score, contributing to the European Commission’s failure to propose legislation. We call for an EU–wide FOPL scheme to be chosen on the basis of evidence-based, transparent policy processes that readdress power imbalances and create the trust required for genuine democratic debate. Front-of-pack nutrition labelling is increasingly adopted as a tool to promote healthier diets. This paper reviews major front-of-pack labelling schemes in the EU with a focus on Nutri-Score, offering a critical assessment of the policy process led by the European Commission on the topic and underscoring the need for it to be more transparent and evidence-based.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
28.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信