多发性硬化症工作困难问卷(MSWDQ-23)的法国验证,并确定截止分数:临床实践中的一个有价值的工具。

IF 2.8 4区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
H. Joly , H. Brissart , R. Fabre , S. Cambiaggio , M. Zerlini , C. Honan , C. Lebrun-Frenay
{"title":"多发性硬化症工作困难问卷(MSWDQ-23)的法国验证,并确定截止分数:临床实践中的一个有价值的工具。","authors":"H. Joly ,&nbsp;H. Brissart ,&nbsp;R. Fabre ,&nbsp;S. Cambiaggio ,&nbsp;M. Zerlini ,&nbsp;C. Honan ,&nbsp;C. Lebrun-Frenay","doi":"10.1016/j.neurol.2025.02.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Work difficulties are a primary issue of multiple sclerosis (MS). This is because disease onset usually occurs during a time when establishing a career and employment is of paramount importance. The MSWDQ-23 (Multiple Sclerosis Work Difficulties Questionnaire) was developed to assess work difficulties in MS. The WORKSEP project aimed to adapt and validate the French MSWDQ-23 and develop cutoff scores through a multicentric study in 14 centers across France. Two hundred and six persons with MS were recruited: 149 with relapsing-remitting MS and 57 with progressive forms of MS. They completed the MSWDQ-23 in French, the DEX to assess the subjective cognitive executive complaint, and the SF-36 evaluating mental (MC) and physical (PC) health-related quality of life. The results indicated that the French version of MSWDQ-23 has high internal consistency (Cronbach's α: 0.93) and test-retest reliability (ICC<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.83). A confirmatory factor analysis demonstrated a scale structure identical to the original English version comprising physical barriers (PB), psychological and cognitive barriers (PCB), and external barriers (EB). The construct and convergent validity were strong. A higher level of work difficulties at PB score was related to a higher level of disability at the EDSS and lower PC quality of life, and a higher level of PCB was related to higher cognitive executive complaints and lower MC quality of life. ROC curves based on the difference between employed and unemployed patients allowed for determining cutoff values of 32 for the total score, 37 for PB, and 27 for PCB. This study allowed the validation of the MSWDQ-23 in the French language and is the first to propose a cutoff. Determining the cutoff value enables identifying patients needing intervention and targets the limitations that MS patients may encounter in the workplace. This easy-to-use instrument provides the opportunity to propose an adapted rehabilitation program or work adjustments to improve the quality of life in patients with MS.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21321,"journal":{"name":"Revue neurologique","volume":"181 4","pages":"Pages 349-362"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"French validation of the Multiple Sclerosis Work Difficulties Questionnaire (MSWDQ-23) with determination of cutoff scores: A valuable tool in clinical practice\",\"authors\":\"H. Joly ,&nbsp;H. Brissart ,&nbsp;R. Fabre ,&nbsp;S. Cambiaggio ,&nbsp;M. Zerlini ,&nbsp;C. Honan ,&nbsp;C. Lebrun-Frenay\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.neurol.2025.02.005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Work difficulties are a primary issue of multiple sclerosis (MS). This is because disease onset usually occurs during a time when establishing a career and employment is of paramount importance. The MSWDQ-23 (Multiple Sclerosis Work Difficulties Questionnaire) was developed to assess work difficulties in MS. The WORKSEP project aimed to adapt and validate the French MSWDQ-23 and develop cutoff scores through a multicentric study in 14 centers across France. Two hundred and six persons with MS were recruited: 149 with relapsing-remitting MS and 57 with progressive forms of MS. They completed the MSWDQ-23 in French, the DEX to assess the subjective cognitive executive complaint, and the SF-36 evaluating mental (MC) and physical (PC) health-related quality of life. The results indicated that the French version of MSWDQ-23 has high internal consistency (Cronbach's α: 0.93) and test-retest reliability (ICC<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.83). A confirmatory factor analysis demonstrated a scale structure identical to the original English version comprising physical barriers (PB), psychological and cognitive barriers (PCB), and external barriers (EB). The construct and convergent validity were strong. A higher level of work difficulties at PB score was related to a higher level of disability at the EDSS and lower PC quality of life, and a higher level of PCB was related to higher cognitive executive complaints and lower MC quality of life. ROC curves based on the difference between employed and unemployed patients allowed for determining cutoff values of 32 for the total score, 37 for PB, and 27 for PCB. This study allowed the validation of the MSWDQ-23 in the French language and is the first to propose a cutoff. Determining the cutoff value enables identifying patients needing intervention and targets the limitations that MS patients may encounter in the workplace. This easy-to-use instrument provides the opportunity to propose an adapted rehabilitation program or work adjustments to improve the quality of life in patients with MS.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21321,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revue neurologique\",\"volume\":\"181 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 349-362\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revue neurologique\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0035378725004345\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revue neurologique","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0035378725004345","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

工作困难是多发性硬化症(MS)的主要问题。这是因为疾病通常发生在确立事业和就业至关重要的时期。开发了MSWDQ-23(多发性硬化症工作困难问卷)来评估多发性硬化症的工作困难。WORKSEP项目旨在调整和验证法国MSWDQ-23,并通过法国14个中心的多中心研究制定截止分数。研究招募了226名多发性硬化症患者:149名复发缓解型多发性硬化症患者和57名进展型多发性硬化症患者。他们完成了法语MSWDQ-23、评估主观认知执行投诉的DEX和评估精神(MC)和身体(PC)健康相关生活质量的SF-36。结果表明,法语版MSWDQ-23具有较高的内部一致性(Cronbach’s α = 0.93)和重测信度(ICC=0.83)。验证性因子分析表明,量表结构与英文原版相同,包括物理障碍(PB)、心理和认知障碍(PCB)和外部障碍(EB)。结构效度和收敛效度较强。高水平的PB工作困难与高水平的EDSS残疾和低水平的PC生活质量有关,高水平的PCB与高水平的认知执行投诉和低水平的MC生活质量有关。基于就业和失业患者之间差异的ROC曲线允许确定总分32、PB 37和PCB 27的截止值。这项研究允许在法语中验证MSWDQ-23,并且是第一个提出截止日期的研究。确定截断值可以识别需要干预的患者,并针对MS患者在工作场所可能遇到的限制。这种易于使用的仪器提供了提出适应的康复计划或工作调整的机会,以提高MS患者的生活质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
French validation of the Multiple Sclerosis Work Difficulties Questionnaire (MSWDQ-23) with determination of cutoff scores: A valuable tool in clinical practice
Work difficulties are a primary issue of multiple sclerosis (MS). This is because disease onset usually occurs during a time when establishing a career and employment is of paramount importance. The MSWDQ-23 (Multiple Sclerosis Work Difficulties Questionnaire) was developed to assess work difficulties in MS. The WORKSEP project aimed to adapt and validate the French MSWDQ-23 and develop cutoff scores through a multicentric study in 14 centers across France. Two hundred and six persons with MS were recruited: 149 with relapsing-remitting MS and 57 with progressive forms of MS. They completed the MSWDQ-23 in French, the DEX to assess the subjective cognitive executive complaint, and the SF-36 evaluating mental (MC) and physical (PC) health-related quality of life. The results indicated that the French version of MSWDQ-23 has high internal consistency (Cronbach's α: 0.93) and test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.83). A confirmatory factor analysis demonstrated a scale structure identical to the original English version comprising physical barriers (PB), psychological and cognitive barriers (PCB), and external barriers (EB). The construct and convergent validity were strong. A higher level of work difficulties at PB score was related to a higher level of disability at the EDSS and lower PC quality of life, and a higher level of PCB was related to higher cognitive executive complaints and lower MC quality of life. ROC curves based on the difference between employed and unemployed patients allowed for determining cutoff values of 32 for the total score, 37 for PB, and 27 for PCB. This study allowed the validation of the MSWDQ-23 in the French language and is the first to propose a cutoff. Determining the cutoff value enables identifying patients needing intervention and targets the limitations that MS patients may encounter in the workplace. This easy-to-use instrument provides the opportunity to propose an adapted rehabilitation program or work adjustments to improve the quality of life in patients with MS.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Revue neurologique
Revue neurologique 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
598
审稿时长
55 days
期刊介绍: The first issue of the Revue Neurologique, featuring an original article by Jean-Martin Charcot, was published on February 28th, 1893. Six years later, the French Society of Neurology (SFN) adopted this journal as its official publication in the year of its foundation, 1899. The Revue Neurologique was published throughout the 20th century without interruption and is indexed in all international databases (including Current Contents, Pubmed, Scopus). Ten annual issues provide original peer-reviewed clinical and research articles, and review articles giving up-to-date insights in all areas of neurology. The Revue Neurologique also publishes guidelines and recommendations. The Revue Neurologique publishes original articles, brief reports, general reviews, editorials, and letters to the editor as well as correspondence concerning articles previously published in the journal in the correspondence column.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信