符合退出子宫颈癌筛查标准的女性的癌症风险估计。

IF 11.7 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Shalini L Kulasingam, Inge M C M de Kok, Abhinav Mehta, Erik E L Jansen, Mary Caroline Regan, James W Killen, Stephen Sy, Ran Zhao, Karen Canfell, Jane J Kim, Megan A Smith, Nicole G Campos
{"title":"符合退出子宫颈癌筛查标准的女性的癌症风险估计。","authors":"Shalini L Kulasingam, Inge M C M de Kok, Abhinav Mehta, Erik E L Jansen, Mary Caroline Regan, James W Killen, Stephen Sy, Ran Zhao, Karen Canfell, Jane J Kim, Megan A Smith, Nicole G Campos","doi":"10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.0479","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Cervical screening guidelines in the US recommend that most females can exit routine screening at age 65 years following 2 recent consecutive negative cotest results (concurrent human papillomavirus and cytology tests). However, empirical data on the subsequent risks of cancer and cancer death in this subgroup of females are limited.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To estimate the risks of cervical cancer and cervical cancer death among females who meet the cotesting criteria to exit screening.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>In this decision analytical comparative modeling study, 4 decision analytical models from the Cancer Intervention and Surveillance Modeling Network-Cervical modeling consortium that fit common US epidemiological data targets were validated against published estimates of 3- and 5-year risks of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 (CIN3) among females meeting exit criteria at Kaiser Permanente Northern California (KPNC).</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>Age-conditional and cumulative risks of cervical cancer and cervical cancer death at ages 65, 70, 75, 80, and 85 years were estimated by performing a comparative modeling analysis of the 4 models to estimate the risks of cervical cancer and cervical cancer death after exiting screening.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All models estimated a 5-year risk of CIN3 that was within the range of empirical data from KPNC. Projections of the cumulative and age-conditional risks of cervical cancer and cervical cancer death increased with time since exiting screening. The cumulative risks of cervical cancer and cervical cancer death by age 70 years were estimated to range from 0.001% to 0.003% and from 0% to 0.001%, respectively. The cumulative risks of cervical cancer and cervical cancer death by age 85 years ranged from 0.026% to 0.081% and from 0.005% to 0.038%, respectively, across models. Results were sensitive to assumptions about screening test sensitivity and incidence of high-risk human papillomavirus.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>In this decision analytical comparative modeling study, a low risk of cervical cancer and cervical cancer death was estimated among females who fulfilled the US criteria to exit screening with cotesting; however, the risks increased with age and/or time since screening exit. The findings suggest that future guidelines should consider acceptable risk levels when defining screening modality and exit age requirements.</p>","PeriodicalId":14694,"journal":{"name":"JAMA Network Open","volume":"8 3","pages":"e250479"},"PeriodicalIF":11.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11904717/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Estimated Cancer Risk in Females Who Meet the Criteria to Exit Cervical Cancer Screening.\",\"authors\":\"Shalini L Kulasingam, Inge M C M de Kok, Abhinav Mehta, Erik E L Jansen, Mary Caroline Regan, James W Killen, Stephen Sy, Ran Zhao, Karen Canfell, Jane J Kim, Megan A Smith, Nicole G Campos\",\"doi\":\"10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.0479\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Cervical screening guidelines in the US recommend that most females can exit routine screening at age 65 years following 2 recent consecutive negative cotest results (concurrent human papillomavirus and cytology tests). However, empirical data on the subsequent risks of cancer and cancer death in this subgroup of females are limited.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To estimate the risks of cervical cancer and cervical cancer death among females who meet the cotesting criteria to exit screening.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>In this decision analytical comparative modeling study, 4 decision analytical models from the Cancer Intervention and Surveillance Modeling Network-Cervical modeling consortium that fit common US epidemiological data targets were validated against published estimates of 3- and 5-year risks of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 (CIN3) among females meeting exit criteria at Kaiser Permanente Northern California (KPNC).</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>Age-conditional and cumulative risks of cervical cancer and cervical cancer death at ages 65, 70, 75, 80, and 85 years were estimated by performing a comparative modeling analysis of the 4 models to estimate the risks of cervical cancer and cervical cancer death after exiting screening.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All models estimated a 5-year risk of CIN3 that was within the range of empirical data from KPNC. Projections of the cumulative and age-conditional risks of cervical cancer and cervical cancer death increased with time since exiting screening. The cumulative risks of cervical cancer and cervical cancer death by age 70 years were estimated to range from 0.001% to 0.003% and from 0% to 0.001%, respectively. The cumulative risks of cervical cancer and cervical cancer death by age 85 years ranged from 0.026% to 0.081% and from 0.005% to 0.038%, respectively, across models. Results were sensitive to assumptions about screening test sensitivity and incidence of high-risk human papillomavirus.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>In this decision analytical comparative modeling study, a low risk of cervical cancer and cervical cancer death was estimated among females who fulfilled the US criteria to exit screening with cotesting; however, the risks increased with age and/or time since screening exit. The findings suggest that future guidelines should consider acceptable risk levels when defining screening modality and exit age requirements.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14694,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JAMA Network Open\",\"volume\":\"8 3\",\"pages\":\"e250479\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":11.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11904717/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JAMA Network Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.0479\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA Network Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.0479","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

重要性:美国宫颈筛查指南建议,大多数65岁女性在最近连续两次阴性检测结果(同时进行人乳头瘤病毒和细胞学检测)后可以退出常规筛查。然而,关于这一亚组女性随后的癌症风险和癌症死亡的经验数据有限。目的:评估符合筛查标准的女性宫颈癌及宫颈癌死亡风险。设计、设置和参与者:在这项决策分析比较建模研究中,来自癌症干预和监测建模网络-宫颈建模联盟的4个决策分析模型符合美国常见的流行病学数据目标,并根据已公布的3年和5年宫颈上皮内瘤变3级(CIN3)风险的估计进行验证,这些女性符合Kaiser Permanente北加州(KPNC)的退出标准。主要结局和测量方法:通过对4种模型进行比较建模分析,估计退出筛查后宫颈癌和宫颈癌死亡的风险,估计65岁、70岁、75岁、80岁和85岁时宫颈癌和宫颈癌死亡的年龄条件和累积风险。结果:所有模型估计CIN3的5年风险都在KPNC的经验数据范围内。自退出筛查以来,宫颈癌和宫颈癌死亡的累积和年龄条件风险预测随着时间的推移而增加。据估计,70岁时宫颈癌和宫颈癌死亡的累积风险分别为0.001%至0.003%和0%至0.001%。在所有模型中,85岁时宫颈癌和宫颈癌死亡的累积风险分别为0.026%至0.081%和0.005%至0.038%。结果对筛选试验敏感性和高危人乳头瘤病毒发生率的假设敏感。结论和相关性:在这项决策分析比较模型研究中,估计符合美国标准退出联合检测筛查的女性宫颈癌和宫颈癌死亡的风险较低;然而,风险随着年龄和/或筛查结束后的时间而增加。研究结果表明,未来的指南在确定筛查方式和退出年龄要求时应考虑可接受的风险水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Estimated Cancer Risk in Females Who Meet the Criteria to Exit Cervical Cancer Screening.

Estimated Cancer Risk in Females Who Meet the Criteria to Exit Cervical Cancer Screening.

Estimated Cancer Risk in Females Who Meet the Criteria to Exit Cervical Cancer Screening.

Importance: Cervical screening guidelines in the US recommend that most females can exit routine screening at age 65 years following 2 recent consecutive negative cotest results (concurrent human papillomavirus and cytology tests). However, empirical data on the subsequent risks of cancer and cancer death in this subgroup of females are limited.

Objective: To estimate the risks of cervical cancer and cervical cancer death among females who meet the cotesting criteria to exit screening.

Design, setting, and participants: In this decision analytical comparative modeling study, 4 decision analytical models from the Cancer Intervention and Surveillance Modeling Network-Cervical modeling consortium that fit common US epidemiological data targets were validated against published estimates of 3- and 5-year risks of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 (CIN3) among females meeting exit criteria at Kaiser Permanente Northern California (KPNC).

Main outcomes and measures: Age-conditional and cumulative risks of cervical cancer and cervical cancer death at ages 65, 70, 75, 80, and 85 years were estimated by performing a comparative modeling analysis of the 4 models to estimate the risks of cervical cancer and cervical cancer death after exiting screening.

Results: All models estimated a 5-year risk of CIN3 that was within the range of empirical data from KPNC. Projections of the cumulative and age-conditional risks of cervical cancer and cervical cancer death increased with time since exiting screening. The cumulative risks of cervical cancer and cervical cancer death by age 70 years were estimated to range from 0.001% to 0.003% and from 0% to 0.001%, respectively. The cumulative risks of cervical cancer and cervical cancer death by age 85 years ranged from 0.026% to 0.081% and from 0.005% to 0.038%, respectively, across models. Results were sensitive to assumptions about screening test sensitivity and incidence of high-risk human papillomavirus.

Conclusions and relevance: In this decision analytical comparative modeling study, a low risk of cervical cancer and cervical cancer death was estimated among females who fulfilled the US criteria to exit screening with cotesting; however, the risks increased with age and/or time since screening exit. The findings suggest that future guidelines should consider acceptable risk levels when defining screening modality and exit age requirements.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JAMA Network Open
JAMA Network Open Medicine-General Medicine
CiteScore
16.00
自引率
2.90%
发文量
2126
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: JAMA Network Open, a member of the esteemed JAMA Network, stands as an international, peer-reviewed, open-access general medical journal.The publication is dedicated to disseminating research across various health disciplines and countries, encompassing clinical care, innovation in health care, health policy, and global health. JAMA Network Open caters to clinicians, investigators, and policymakers, providing a platform for valuable insights and advancements in the medical field. As part of the JAMA Network, a consortium of peer-reviewed general medical and specialty publications, JAMA Network Open contributes to the collective knowledge and understanding within the medical community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书