色差对三焦人工晶状体患者视觉质量的影响。

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Helin S Güngör, Grzegorz Łabuz, Timur M Yildirim, Gerd U Auffarth, Ramin Khoramnia
{"title":"色差对三焦人工晶状体患者视觉质量的影响。","authors":"Helin S Güngör, Grzegorz Łabuz, Timur M Yildirim, Gerd U Auffarth, Ramin Khoramnia","doi":"10.3928/1081597X-20240731-03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To investigate how varying levels of longitudinal chromatic aberration (LCA) affect visual quality in patients with trifocal intraocular lenses (IOLs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-nine patients implanted with trifocal IOLs were assessed for corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), defocus curves, the contrast sensitivity function, and the area under the logarithmic contrast sensitivity function (AULCSF). The measurements were performed under natural viewing conditions after introducing +1.00 and -1.00 diopters (D) of LCA using zero-power triplet lenses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CDVA was -0.10 ± 0.09, -0.07 ± 0.09, and -0.08 ± 0.08 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) with natural, enhanced, and reduced LCA, respectively. At defocus levels of 0.00 to -1.50 D, visual acuity decrease was steeper under natural conditions than under conditions with more positive LCA. At a defocus level of -2.50 D, visual acuity was 0.02 ± 0.09, 0.03 ± 0.08, and 0.06 ± 0.14 logMAR with natural, elevated, and reduced LCA, respectively. The AULCSF was 1.19 ± 0.12 under natural and reduced LCA conditions. Increasing LCA lowered the AULCSF to 1.12 ± 0.13 (<i>P</i> ≤ .0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>LCA elevation led to a slight enhancement of depth of focus while not substantially affecting vision at far focus. Reducing LCA with an achromatizing triplet lens failed to improve CDVA and contrast sensitivity. Likewise, at intermediate and near viewing distances, lowering LCA did not improve visual function. <b>[<i>J Refract Surg</i>. 2024;40(10):e692-e698.]</b>.</p>","PeriodicalId":16951,"journal":{"name":"Journal of refractive surgery","volume":"40 10","pages":"e692-e698"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Influence of Chromatic Aberration on Visual Quality in Patients With Trifocal Intraocular Lenses.\",\"authors\":\"Helin S Güngör, Grzegorz Łabuz, Timur M Yildirim, Gerd U Auffarth, Ramin Khoramnia\",\"doi\":\"10.3928/1081597X-20240731-03\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To investigate how varying levels of longitudinal chromatic aberration (LCA) affect visual quality in patients with trifocal intraocular lenses (IOLs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-nine patients implanted with trifocal IOLs were assessed for corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), defocus curves, the contrast sensitivity function, and the area under the logarithmic contrast sensitivity function (AULCSF). The measurements were performed under natural viewing conditions after introducing +1.00 and -1.00 diopters (D) of LCA using zero-power triplet lenses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CDVA was -0.10 ± 0.09, -0.07 ± 0.09, and -0.08 ± 0.08 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) with natural, enhanced, and reduced LCA, respectively. At defocus levels of 0.00 to -1.50 D, visual acuity decrease was steeper under natural conditions than under conditions with more positive LCA. At a defocus level of -2.50 D, visual acuity was 0.02 ± 0.09, 0.03 ± 0.08, and 0.06 ± 0.14 logMAR with natural, elevated, and reduced LCA, respectively. The AULCSF was 1.19 ± 0.12 under natural and reduced LCA conditions. Increasing LCA lowered the AULCSF to 1.12 ± 0.13 (<i>P</i> ≤ .0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>LCA elevation led to a slight enhancement of depth of focus while not substantially affecting vision at far focus. Reducing LCA with an achromatizing triplet lens failed to improve CDVA and contrast sensitivity. Likewise, at intermediate and near viewing distances, lowering LCA did not improve visual function. <b>[<i>J Refract Surg</i>. 2024;40(10):e692-e698.]</b>.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16951,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of refractive surgery\",\"volume\":\"40 10\",\"pages\":\"e692-e698\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of refractive surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597X-20240731-03\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of refractive surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597X-20240731-03","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨不同程度的纵向色差(LCA)对三焦人工晶状体(iol)患者视觉质量的影响。方法:对29例人工晶状体植入术患者进行矫正距离视力(CDVA)、离焦曲线、对比敏感度函数和对数对比敏感度函数下面积(AULCSF)的测定。在自然观察条件下,使用零倍率三元透镜引入+1.00和-1.00屈光度(D)的LCA进行测量。结果:自然LCA、增强LCA和降低LCA的CDVA分别为最小分辨角(logMAR)的-0.10±0.09、-0.07±0.09和-0.08±0.08对数。在离焦水平为0.00 ~ -1.50 D时,自然条件下的视力下降幅度大于LCA阳性条件下的视力下降幅度。在离焦水平为-2.50 D时,视灵敏度分别为0.02±0.09、0.03±0.08和0.06±0.14 logMAR, LCA自然、升高和降低。在自然和低LCA条件下,AULCSF为1.19±0.12。LCA升高使AULCSF降至1.12±0.13 (P≤0.0001)。结论:LCA抬高导致焦深轻微增强,但对远焦视力没有实质性影响。用消色差三联镜降低LCA不能改善CDVA和对比灵敏度。同样,在中距离和近距离观看时,降低LCA并不能改善视觉功能。[J].中华眼科杂志,2014;35(10):892 - 898。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Influence of Chromatic Aberration on Visual Quality in Patients With Trifocal Intraocular Lenses.

Purpose: To investigate how varying levels of longitudinal chromatic aberration (LCA) affect visual quality in patients with trifocal intraocular lenses (IOLs).

Methods: Twenty-nine patients implanted with trifocal IOLs were assessed for corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), defocus curves, the contrast sensitivity function, and the area under the logarithmic contrast sensitivity function (AULCSF). The measurements were performed under natural viewing conditions after introducing +1.00 and -1.00 diopters (D) of LCA using zero-power triplet lenses.

Results: CDVA was -0.10 ± 0.09, -0.07 ± 0.09, and -0.08 ± 0.08 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) with natural, enhanced, and reduced LCA, respectively. At defocus levels of 0.00 to -1.50 D, visual acuity decrease was steeper under natural conditions than under conditions with more positive LCA. At a defocus level of -2.50 D, visual acuity was 0.02 ± 0.09, 0.03 ± 0.08, and 0.06 ± 0.14 logMAR with natural, elevated, and reduced LCA, respectively. The AULCSF was 1.19 ± 0.12 under natural and reduced LCA conditions. Increasing LCA lowered the AULCSF to 1.12 ± 0.13 (P ≤ .0001).

Conclusions: LCA elevation led to a slight enhancement of depth of focus while not substantially affecting vision at far focus. Reducing LCA with an achromatizing triplet lens failed to improve CDVA and contrast sensitivity. Likewise, at intermediate and near viewing distances, lowering LCA did not improve visual function. [J Refract Surg. 2024;40(10):e692-e698.].

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
12.50%
发文量
160
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Refractive Surgery, the official journal of the International Society of Refractive Surgery, a partner of the American Academy of Ophthalmology, has been a monthly peer-reviewed forum for original research, review, and evaluation of refractive and lens-based surgical procedures for more than 30 years. Practical, clinically valuable articles provide readers with the most up-to-date information regarding advances in the field of refractive surgery. Begin to explore the Journal and all of its great benefits such as: • Columns including “Translational Science,” “Surgical Techniques,” and “Biomechanics” • Supplemental videos and materials available for many articles • Access to current articles, as well as several years of archived content • Articles posted online just 2 months after acceptance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信