经股骨TAVR经皮与手术通路的比较分析:一项倾向匹配的队列研究。

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Georgios E Papadopoulos, Ilias Ninios, Eleftherios Leptopoulos, Konstantinos Papazoglou, Konstantinos Konstantinidis, Sotirios Evangelou, Andreas Ioannides, Vlasis Ninios
{"title":"经股骨TAVR经皮与手术通路的比较分析:一项倾向匹配的队列研究。","authors":"Georgios E Papadopoulos, Ilias Ninios, Eleftherios Leptopoulos, Konstantinos Papazoglou, Konstantinos Konstantinidis, Sotirios Evangelou, Andreas Ioannides, Vlasis Ninios","doi":"10.1016/j.hjc.2025.03.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is a proven treatment for severe aortic stenosis. Transfemoral access is the most prevalent method, achieved either surgically or percutaneously. This study compared in-hospital outcomes and length of stay between surgical cut-down and fully percutaneous approaches.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective, propensity-matched study analyzed medical records of all patients who underwent transfemoral TAVR at our center from January 2019 to December 2023. Outcomes were assessed based on Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 (VARC-2) consensus criteria.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 251 TAVR patients (77 propensity score-matched pairs) were included (55% female) with a median (IQR) age of 80 (11) years. Surgical cut-down showed fewer vascular complications, bleeding, and transfusions. No death was reported in this group. Fewer mean hospitalization days were observed in the total cohort over the years (p < 0.001). This reduction was more pronounced after 2021 when the surgical approach was adopted. Mean hospitalization days were 6.40 ± 6.46 for percutaneous and 4.34 ± 1.61 for surgical groups (p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Surgical cut-down for TAVR femoral access yields superior outcomes and shorter hospital stays compared to fully percutaneous methods.</p>","PeriodicalId":55062,"journal":{"name":"Hellenic Journal of Cardiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative analysis of percutaneous vs. surgical access in transfemoral TAVR: a propensity-matched cohort study.\",\"authors\":\"Georgios E Papadopoulos, Ilias Ninios, Eleftherios Leptopoulos, Konstantinos Papazoglou, Konstantinos Konstantinidis, Sotirios Evangelou, Andreas Ioannides, Vlasis Ninios\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.hjc.2025.03.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is a proven treatment for severe aortic stenosis. Transfemoral access is the most prevalent method, achieved either surgically or percutaneously. This study compared in-hospital outcomes and length of stay between surgical cut-down and fully percutaneous approaches.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective, propensity-matched study analyzed medical records of all patients who underwent transfemoral TAVR at our center from January 2019 to December 2023. Outcomes were assessed based on Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 (VARC-2) consensus criteria.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 251 TAVR patients (77 propensity score-matched pairs) were included (55% female) with a median (IQR) age of 80 (11) years. Surgical cut-down showed fewer vascular complications, bleeding, and transfusions. No death was reported in this group. Fewer mean hospitalization days were observed in the total cohort over the years (p < 0.001). This reduction was more pronounced after 2021 when the surgical approach was adopted. Mean hospitalization days were 6.40 ± 6.46 for percutaneous and 4.34 ± 1.61 for surgical groups (p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Surgical cut-down for TAVR femoral access yields superior outcomes and shorter hospital stays compared to fully percutaneous methods.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55062,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hellenic Journal of Cardiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hellenic Journal of Cardiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hjc.2025.03.003\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hellenic Journal of Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hjc.2025.03.003","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)是治疗严重主动脉瓣狭窄(AS)的有效方法。经股通道是最普遍的方法,可以通过手术或经皮获得。本研究比较了手术切口和完全经皮入路的住院结果和住院时间。方法:这项回顾性、倾向匹配的研究分析了2019年1月至2023年12月在我们中心接受经股TAVR手术的所有患者的病历。根据Valve学术研究联盟-2 (VARC-2)共识标准评估结果。结果:纳入251例TAVR患者(77对倾向评分匹配对)(55%为女性),中位(IQR)年龄为80(11)岁。手术切口显示血管并发症、出血和输血较少。本组无死亡报告。多年来,总队列中观察到的平均住院天数较少(p< 0.001)。在2021年采用手术入路后,这种减少更为明显。经皮组平均住院时间为6.40±6.46天,手术组平均住院时间为4.34±1.61天(p< 0.001)。结论:与完全经皮方法相比,手术切除TAVR股骨通路具有更好的疗效和更短的住院时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative analysis of percutaneous vs. surgical access in transfemoral TAVR: a propensity-matched cohort study.

Objective: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is a proven treatment for severe aortic stenosis. Transfemoral access is the most prevalent method, achieved either surgically or percutaneously. This study compared in-hospital outcomes and length of stay between surgical cut-down and fully percutaneous approaches.

Methods: This retrospective, propensity-matched study analyzed medical records of all patients who underwent transfemoral TAVR at our center from January 2019 to December 2023. Outcomes were assessed based on Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 (VARC-2) consensus criteria.

Results: A total of 251 TAVR patients (77 propensity score-matched pairs) were included (55% female) with a median (IQR) age of 80 (11) years. Surgical cut-down showed fewer vascular complications, bleeding, and transfusions. No death was reported in this group. Fewer mean hospitalization days were observed in the total cohort over the years (p < 0.001). This reduction was more pronounced after 2021 when the surgical approach was adopted. Mean hospitalization days were 6.40 ± 6.46 for percutaneous and 4.34 ± 1.61 for surgical groups (p < 0.001).

Conclusion: Surgical cut-down for TAVR femoral access yields superior outcomes and shorter hospital stays compared to fully percutaneous methods.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Hellenic Journal of Cardiology
Hellenic Journal of Cardiology CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
7.30%
发文量
86
审稿时长
56 days
期刊介绍: The Hellenic Journal of Cardiology (International Edition, ISSN 1109-9666) is the official journal of the Hellenic Society of Cardiology and aims to publish high-quality articles on all aspects of cardiovascular medicine. A primary goal is to publish in each issue a number of original articles related to clinical and basic research. Many of these will be accompanied by invited editorial comments. Hot topics, such as molecular cardiology, and innovative cardiac imaging and electrophysiological mapping techniques, will appear frequently in the journal in the form of invited expert articles or special reports. The Editorial Committee also attaches great importance to subjects related to continuing medical education, the implementation of guidelines and cost effectiveness in cardiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信