认知附加任务对健康人功能性脑冲动测验影响的研究。

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
Büşra Sezer, Mine Baydan Aran
{"title":"认知附加任务对健康人功能性脑冲动测验影响的研究。","authors":"Büşra Sezer, Mine Baydan Aran","doi":"10.1159/000544719","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Performing two tasks simultaneously may present various challenges for the human cognitive system. This study investigates how concurrent cognitive tasks impact the performance of the functional head impulse test (fHIT) in healthy adults. It was hypothesized that adding a cognitive load during fHIT would reduce the test's scores due to shared attentional resources.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Twenty-seven participants completed the functional head impulse test (fHIT) and verbal fluency tests simultaneously. The study was designed in three stages: (1) recording fHIT results without any cognitive task, (2) completing the categorical fluency test and fHIT concurrently, and (3) administering the phonemic fluency test and fHIT simultaneously, with results recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significant differences were observed in fHIT performance with and without additional cognitive tasks. Categorical tasks (e.g., animal and furniture categories) and phonemic tasks (e.g., words starting with \"K,\" \"A,\" or \"S\") impacted fHIT results, with notable performance reductions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study demonstrates that dual-task scenarios involving cognitive and vestibular demands adversely affect fHIT performance. The findings underscore the importance of attentional capacity in tasks requiring simultaneous cognitive and visual-oculomotor processing. These insights could guide future clinical applications in assessing and rehabilitating vestibular and cognitive deficits.</p>","PeriodicalId":55432,"journal":{"name":"Audiology and Neuro-Otology","volume":" ","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Investigation of the Effect of Cognitive Additional Tasks on Functional Head Impulse Test in Healthy Individuals.\",\"authors\":\"Büşra Sezer, Mine Baydan Aran\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000544719\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Performing two tasks simultaneously may present various challenges for the human cognitive system. This study investigates how concurrent cognitive tasks impact the performance of the functional head impulse test (fHIT) in healthy adults. It was hypothesized that adding a cognitive load during fHIT would reduce the test's scores due to shared attentional resources.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Twenty-seven participants completed the functional head impulse test (fHIT) and verbal fluency tests simultaneously. The study was designed in three stages: (1) recording fHIT results without any cognitive task, (2) completing the categorical fluency test and fHIT concurrently, and (3) administering the phonemic fluency test and fHIT simultaneously, with results recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significant differences were observed in fHIT performance with and without additional cognitive tasks. Categorical tasks (e.g., animal and furniture categories) and phonemic tasks (e.g., words starting with \\\"K,\\\" \\\"A,\\\" or \\\"S\\\") impacted fHIT results, with notable performance reductions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study demonstrates that dual-task scenarios involving cognitive and vestibular demands adversely affect fHIT performance. The findings underscore the importance of attentional capacity in tasks requiring simultaneous cognitive and visual-oculomotor processing. These insights could guide future clinical applications in assessing and rehabilitating vestibular and cognitive deficits.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55432,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Audiology and Neuro-Otology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Audiology and Neuro-Otology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000544719\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Audiology and Neuro-Otology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000544719","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:同时执行两项任务可能会给人类的认知系统带来各种挑战。本研究探讨了并发认知任务对健康成人功能性脑冲动测验(fHIT)成绩的影响。假设在fHIT过程中增加认知负荷会由于共享注意力资源而降低测试分数。方法:27名被试同时完成脑功能冲动测试(fHIT)和语言流畅性测试。本研究分为三个阶段:(1)在没有任何认知任务的情况下记录fHIT结果;(2)同时完成分类流畅性测试和fHIT测试;(3)同时进行音素流畅性测试和fHIT测试,并记录结果。结果:在有和没有额外认知任务的fHIT表现上观察到显著差异。分类任务(例如,动物和家具类别)和音素任务(例如,以“K”、“A”或“S”开头的单词)会影响fHIT结果,显著降低性能。结论:本研究表明,涉及认知和前庭需求的双重任务场景会对fHIT的表现产生不利影响。研究结果强调了注意能力在需要同时进行认知和视觉-动眼力处理的任务中的重要性。这些见解可以指导未来在评估和康复前庭和认知缺陷方面的临床应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Investigation of the Effect of Cognitive Additional Tasks on Functional Head Impulse Test in Healthy Individuals.

Introduction: Performing two tasks simultaneously may present various challenges for the human cognitive system. This study investigates how concurrent cognitive tasks impact the performance of the functional head impulse test (fHIT) in healthy adults. It was hypothesized that adding a cognitive load during fHIT would reduce the test's scores due to shared attentional resources.

Method: Twenty-seven participants completed the functional head impulse test (fHIT) and verbal fluency tests simultaneously. The study was designed in three stages: (1) recording fHIT results without any cognitive task, (2) completing the categorical fluency test and fHIT concurrently, and (3) administering the phonemic fluency test and fHIT simultaneously, with results recorded.

Results: Significant differences were observed in fHIT performance with and without additional cognitive tasks. Categorical tasks (e.g., animal and furniture categories) and phonemic tasks (e.g., words starting with "K," "A," or "S") impacted fHIT results, with notable performance reductions.

Conclusion: This study demonstrates that dual-task scenarios involving cognitive and vestibular demands adversely affect fHIT performance. The findings underscore the importance of attentional capacity in tasks requiring simultaneous cognitive and visual-oculomotor processing. These insights could guide future clinical applications in assessing and rehabilitating vestibular and cognitive deficits.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Audiology and Neuro-Otology
Audiology and Neuro-Otology 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
6.20%
发文量
35
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: ''Audiology and Neurotology'' provides a forum for the publication of the most-advanced and rigorous scientific research related to the basic science and clinical aspects of the auditory and vestibular system and diseases of the ear. This journal seeks submission of cutting edge research opening up new and innovative fields of study that may improve our understanding and treatment of patients with disorders of the auditory and vestibular systems, their central connections and their perception in the central nervous system. In addition to original papers the journal also offers invited review articles on current topics written by leading experts in the field. The journal is of primary importance for all scientists and practitioners interested in audiology, otology and neurotology, auditory neurosciences and related disciplines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信