十种潜在的职业致敏暴露与哮喘之间关系的系统综述。

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Annett Dalbøge, Henrik Albert Kolstad, Alexander Jahn, Charlotte Suppli Ulrik, David Lee Sherson, Harald William Meyer, Niels Ebbehøj, Torben Sigsgaard, Xaver Baur, Vivi Schlünssen
{"title":"十种潜在的职业致敏暴露与哮喘之间关系的系统综述。","authors":"Annett Dalbøge, Henrik Albert Kolstad, Alexander Jahn, Charlotte Suppli Ulrik, David Lee Sherson, Harald William Meyer, Niels Ebbehøj, Torben Sigsgaard, Xaver Baur, Vivi Schlünssen","doi":"10.5271/sjweh.4214","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this systematic review was to identify, evaluate, and synthesize the relation between ten potential occupational sensitizing exposure groups and asthma.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic literature search was conducted in three databases for peer-reviewed articles published between July 2011 and March 2023. Exposures included ten potential occupational sensitizing exposure groups (amines, anhydrides, biocides [eg, pesticides], crustaceans, enzymes, mammals, metals, \"mold, fungi and yeast\", molluscs, and other chemicals [eg, cleaning agents]) classified as having no or limited evidence of a causal relation with asthma in our previous overview of systematic reviews. We included observational and case studies. Study selection, data extraction, risk of bias assessment, and evidence level evaluation were conducted independently by two reviewers, who also upgraded or downgraded the level of evidence found in our overview.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This review included 55 articles. The overall confidence in study results was rated high in 8, moderate in 18, and low in 29 studies. No new studies were found for molluscs. For the remaining exposures, we upgraded main groups of crustaceans and enzymes to moderate evidence, mammals and metals to limited/contradictory, and amines and biocides to very limited/contradictory. For subgroups/specific exposures, pesticides, cleaning agents - such as chloramine and disinfection products - and an unspecified group of other chemicals, specifically acrylates and epoxy, were upgraded to moderate.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>New occupational sensitizing exposures with moderate evidence include crustaceans, enzymes, pesticides, cleaning agents such as chloramine and disinfection products, and chemicals such as acrylates and epoxy.</p>","PeriodicalId":21528,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A systematic review of the relation between ten potential occupational sensitizing exposures and asthma.\",\"authors\":\"Annett Dalbøge, Henrik Albert Kolstad, Alexander Jahn, Charlotte Suppli Ulrik, David Lee Sherson, Harald William Meyer, Niels Ebbehøj, Torben Sigsgaard, Xaver Baur, Vivi Schlünssen\",\"doi\":\"10.5271/sjweh.4214\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this systematic review was to identify, evaluate, and synthesize the relation between ten potential occupational sensitizing exposure groups and asthma.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic literature search was conducted in three databases for peer-reviewed articles published between July 2011 and March 2023. Exposures included ten potential occupational sensitizing exposure groups (amines, anhydrides, biocides [eg, pesticides], crustaceans, enzymes, mammals, metals, \\\"mold, fungi and yeast\\\", molluscs, and other chemicals [eg, cleaning agents]) classified as having no or limited evidence of a causal relation with asthma in our previous overview of systematic reviews. We included observational and case studies. Study selection, data extraction, risk of bias assessment, and evidence level evaluation were conducted independently by two reviewers, who also upgraded or downgraded the level of evidence found in our overview.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This review included 55 articles. The overall confidence in study results was rated high in 8, moderate in 18, and low in 29 studies. No new studies were found for molluscs. For the remaining exposures, we upgraded main groups of crustaceans and enzymes to moderate evidence, mammals and metals to limited/contradictory, and amines and biocides to very limited/contradictory. For subgroups/specific exposures, pesticides, cleaning agents - such as chloramine and disinfection products - and an unspecified group of other chemicals, specifically acrylates and epoxy, were upgraded to moderate.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>New occupational sensitizing exposures with moderate evidence include crustaceans, enzymes, pesticides, cleaning agents such as chloramine and disinfection products, and chemicals such as acrylates and epoxy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21528,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5271/sjweh.4214\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5271/sjweh.4214","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本系统综述的目的是识别、评价和综合十个潜在的职业致敏暴露人群与哮喘的关系。方法:系统检索2011年7月至2023年3月间发表的同行评议文章。暴露包括10个潜在的职业致敏暴露组(胺类、酸酐类、杀菌剂[如农药]、甲壳类、酶类、哺乳动物、金属、“霉菌、真菌和酵母”、软体动物和其他化学品[如清洁剂]),在我们之前的系统综述中被分类为没有或有限证据表明与哮喘有因果关系。我们纳入了观察性研究和个案研究。研究选择、数据提取、偏倚风险评估和证据水平评估由两名审稿人独立进行,他们也对我们综述中发现的证据水平进行了升级或降级。结果:本综述纳入55篇文章。8项研究对研究结果的总体信心被评为高,18项研究被评为中等,29项研究被评为低。没有发现软体动物的新研究。对于剩余的暴露,我们将甲壳类和酶的主要类群升级为中等证据,将哺乳动物和金属的主要类群升级为有限/矛盾,将胺类和杀菌剂的主要类群升级为非常有限/矛盾。对于亚组/特定暴露,农药、清洁剂(如氯胺和消毒产品)和未指定组的其他化学品(特别是丙烯酸酯和环氧树脂)被升级为中等暴露。结论:有中度证据的新职业致敏暴露包括甲壳类动物、酶、农药、氯胺和消毒产品等清洗剂以及丙烯酸酯和环氧树脂等化学品。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A systematic review of the relation between ten potential occupational sensitizing exposures and asthma.

Objective: The aim of this systematic review was to identify, evaluate, and synthesize the relation between ten potential occupational sensitizing exposure groups and asthma.

Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted in three databases for peer-reviewed articles published between July 2011 and March 2023. Exposures included ten potential occupational sensitizing exposure groups (amines, anhydrides, biocides [eg, pesticides], crustaceans, enzymes, mammals, metals, "mold, fungi and yeast", molluscs, and other chemicals [eg, cleaning agents]) classified as having no or limited evidence of a causal relation with asthma in our previous overview of systematic reviews. We included observational and case studies. Study selection, data extraction, risk of bias assessment, and evidence level evaluation were conducted independently by two reviewers, who also upgraded or downgraded the level of evidence found in our overview.

Results: This review included 55 articles. The overall confidence in study results was rated high in 8, moderate in 18, and low in 29 studies. No new studies were found for molluscs. For the remaining exposures, we upgraded main groups of crustaceans and enzymes to moderate evidence, mammals and metals to limited/contradictory, and amines and biocides to very limited/contradictory. For subgroups/specific exposures, pesticides, cleaning agents - such as chloramine and disinfection products - and an unspecified group of other chemicals, specifically acrylates and epoxy, were upgraded to moderate.

Conclusion: New occupational sensitizing exposures with moderate evidence include crustaceans, enzymes, pesticides, cleaning agents such as chloramine and disinfection products, and chemicals such as acrylates and epoxy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health
Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
9.50%
发文量
65
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The aim of the Journal is to promote research in the fields of occupational and environmental health and safety and to increase knowledge through the publication of original research articles, systematic reviews, and other information of high interest. Areas of interest include occupational and environmental epidemiology, occupational and environmental medicine, psychosocial factors at work, physical work load, physical activity work-related mental and musculoskeletal problems, aging, work ability and return to work, working hours and health, occupational hygiene and toxicology, work safety and injury epidemiology as well as occupational health services. In addition to observational studies, quasi-experimental and intervention studies are welcome as well as methodological papers, occupational cohort profiles, and studies associated with economic evaluation. The Journal also publishes short communications, case reports, commentaries, discussion papers, clinical questions, consensus reports, meeting reports, other reports, book reviews, news, and announcements (jobs, courses, events etc).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信